Managed Accounts May Suit Some Participants

While target-date funds may hold the most contributions, they can still co-exist with managed accounts..

Recent research from Cerulli Associates takes a critical look at the use of managed accounts in the defined contribution (DC) market, now estimated at $5.2 trillion. As the DC market matures, Cerulli notes that the asset management industry continues to reassess and measure the efficacy of a target-date product as the primary retirement investment solution for most savers, according to “Retirement Markets 2015: Growth Opportunities in Maturing Markets.” 

At the same time, other investment vehicles, such as managed accounts, come in for their share of assessment for their place in a retirement plan. Managed accounts will likely do better in DC plans if they are presented as a service instead of just another investment option, says Jessica Sclafani, associate director at Cerulli. These accounts should complement target-date funds (TDFs), she notes, rather than jockeying for top position.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Managed accounts, are now increasing in popularity and becoming more sophisticated in their use of technology, even as retirement plans find the due diligence in product selection somewhat challenging. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted last year that a lack of guidance and inconsistent information about performance hamper plan sponsors in selecting and overseeing managed account providers.   

One key to using managed accounts correctly is positioning their advantages. Customization is a route to supporting improved participant outcomes, according to Sclafani. Yet the two most common qualified default investment alternatives (QDIAs)—balanced funds and TDFs—do not address financial planning and personalized strategies, she points out, while managed accounts do.

NEXT: Managed accounts particularly suitable for some participants

As participants’ investable assets increase, they become much more interested in planning and strategies tailored to their specific situations, explaining why managed accounts attract so much interest in the DC industry.

Managed accounts may not be right for all participants, the report says. Participants who are nearing retirement, have amassed outside assets and are looking for additional services may find them most useful. Cerulli estimates there are approximately 19.5 million households ages 45 to 69 with investable assets ranging from $100,000 to $2 million. These housesholds, which represent $9.1 trillion in investable assets, are the target market for managed account providers, according to Cerulli.

Managed account providers should partner with DC plan sponsors to make sure a managed account’s distinct advantages—access to personalized advice or the ability to incorporate assets outside the DC plan for a more holistic financial planning experience—are conveyed to participants, the report recommends.

To motivate participants to opt in to a managed account service, plan sponsors and advisers need to help them understand what they are paying for. This requires extra work from both plan sponsor and managed account provider in educating employees.

“Retirement Markets 2015: Growth Opportunities in Maturing Markets,” focuses on trends in the $21.5 trillion retirement marketplace, including assets and growth projections in the different retirement segments—private/public defined benefit plans, private/public defined contribution plans, and the individual retirement account (IRA) market. More information, including how to purchase, is on Cerulli’s website.

Public Pensions Face Imminent Funding Challenges

Flat returns, lowered assumptions and changing participant demographics will erode funded ratios, according to a report from Milliman.

On a market value basis, public pension funded status increased by more than 4% in 2014, according to Milliman’s fourth annual Public Pension Funding Study of the nation’s 100 largest public defined benefit (DB) plans.

Overall reported funded ratios increased from 70.7% to 75%. However, after years of strong asset performance, 2015 has been flat from an equity standpoint, and many public plan sponsors have reduced return assumptions going forward, a trend that reflects today’s market realities but also creates a steeper hill to climb if these pensions are to reach full funding, Milliman says.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“Given the early returns in 2015, the road ahead could be challenging for the 66% of these plans that are less than 80% funded,” says Becky Sielman, author of the Milliman Public Pension Funding Study. “Many public plans have become more realistic about return assumptions in recent years—the median return assumption has decreased from 8% in 2012 to 7.65% this year—which will further steepen the climb to full funding, especially for the 10% of our study that are currently less than 50% funded.”

The study also found, for the first time, retired and inactive members outnumber active members. And the accrued liability for those retirees overshadows the accrued liability for employees by more than 40% in aggregate.

To download the complete study report, go to www.milliman.com/PPFS.

«