July 15, 2005 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - The Minnesota
legislature passed a bill to increase employer contributions
to the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) to 7%
of payroll in 2010, which will cost taxpayers $92 million per
year, according to the Minneapolis Star Tribune.
The contributions will be phased in beginning with a
jump from the current 5 1/2% to 6% in 2006 followed by
increases of 0.25 percentage points in four subsequent
years, the newspaper reported.
The bill also increased employee contributions.
Since PERA is the major source of funding for local
government pensions, it is those governments that will
shoulder most of the burden for the expense, the
newspaper notes.
Opponents felt the bill, passed in the final hour of
the state legislature’s special session, should
have been considered more thoughtfully. But, the
newspaper quotes Minnesota state senator Larry Pogemiller
as saying, “The idea is there’s no benefit
increase [in the bill]. It’s an employee and employer
increase. It gets it back on stable funding.”
Pogemiller said the contribution increases were
recommended by the Legislature’s Pension Commission,
according to the news report.
The bursting of the dot-com stock market bubble,
coupled with benefit increases, left the fund with about
77 cents in assets for every $1 in liability, according
to House Republican research staff, the Star Tribune
said.
Governor Tim Pawlenty said he was reviewing the
bill and expected to sign it.
July 14, 2005 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Hedge funds are
expected to bring in $40 billion this year - about a third of
their 2004 totals - as investor tastes for traditionally
popular offerings cools dramatically.
This was the key conclusion of a Deutsche Bank survey of
o
ver 650 investment firms worldwide, which predicted
the significant slowdown in the once red hot hedge fund
space, according to a Deutsche Bank
Web site statement
.
The latest prediction for hedge fund assets compares to the
$123 billion that pension funds, endowments, charities and
wealthy investors poured into the loosely regulated
vehicles in 2004 – an asset record.
“We are seeing a slowing down of enthusiasm for
flows into this space,” John Dyment, Global Head of
the bank’s Hedge Fund Capital Group told reporters,
according to a Reuters report.
The survey found that the asset growth slowdown was not
evident across the board among different levels of
investors. For example, small investors, who have assets of
$500 million or less, plan to bump up their hedge fund
allocations by 6.3%. At the other end of the size spectrum,
the biggest investors, with more than $5 billion in assets,
planned the smallest increase to hedge funds with a
forecast 2.17% increase, the survey shows.
Particularly hard hit with outflows as losses mounted
were hedge funds pursuing convertible arbitrage strategies
where managers often bet a company’s bond price will
rise while its stock price will fall, according to the
survey.
According to the survey, investors now expect returns to
be modest with 68% of those polled expected a total
industry performance of between 6% and 8%.
Other survey results included that:
Pensions, endowments and foundations are making
investment decisions more quickly, with half making
allocation decisions in six months or less. Once in,
they consistently hold their investments longer than
any other investment class.
Investors are diversifying their allocations to
more managers, with the average fund of fund or family
office holding investments with 20-100 different hedge
fund managers
Investors rank the best performing investment
strategy for 2005 – 35% rank long/short equity as the
top performing strategy and 22% rank Macro strategies
as a top performer.
Multi-strategy hedge funds are emerging as one of
the top investment choices for 2005, with investors
selecting it because of their ability to move
allocations of assets between strategy classes in a
dynamic market.
Investors predict Asia, excluding China and Japan,
will be the top performing region of 2005.
Investors are becoming increasingly resistant to
lock-up periods. In 2004, 68% of investors would only
invest in managers with lock-ups of one year or less;
in 2005, this number rose to 77%.