August 21, 2001(PLANSPONSOR.com) - Morningstar has
introduced the Morningstar Managed Portfolios program, a
portfolio-management service for advisors who want to use
external professionals for additional help with portfolio
management and monitoring.
Morningstar Managed Portfolios is a fee-based
investment-management program, which will initially
feature mutual-fund portfolios, researched, engineered,
and monitored by Morningstar Investment Services, as well
as back-office operations and support services.
An online solution will provide complete client account
management capabilities and marketing and sales
support.
Client portfolios will be continuously monitored,
rebalanced and adjusted based on market performance and
portfolio information.
The group has entered into an agreement with online
brokerage clearing and trade-execution firm, Fleet/US
Clearing, to offer the program to financial advisors,
including its 275 correspondent broker-dealer
clients.
The new program is scheduled for launch in the fourth
quarter and separate accounts, allowing for portfolios to
be created using mutual funds, will be added next
year.
June 21, 2001 - Several readers opined (along with
their responses) that they expected this week's survey to be
a "doozie" --and they were right. In terms of a final result,
there wasn't much suspense --a full 84% opposed any kind of
price caps/controls to help with California's energy crisis.
Most seemed to believe that (a) California had gotten itself
into this "mess", and now had to extricate itself or (b)
other states had similar energy crises at other times, with
no federal intervention. Of the 15% that supported at least
some level of support (and no, they weren't all from
California), most were concerned about the potential impact
on lower income families --and a concern that there were
energy firms taking advantage of the situation to unfairly
gouge prices. One percent -- was honest enough to admit that
they didn't know enough about the situation/consequences to
weigh in (although there was also: First let me state that I
do not have enough understanding of why there is a shortage
of power out west (I.e. production capacity vs. usage and the
history of energy companies there). But I never let facts get
in the way of a good opinion)
“Being on the West Coast and therefore impacted by
what happens in California, I feel the situation is a bit
more complicated than just guarding against price hikes
or spikes. Californians are just beginning to look at how
they can conserve energy. My husband travels down there
and has noted that landscape lighting is finally being
reduced and stores are beginning to cut back on usage.
But all of us have a ways to go. Higher prices will cause
us to look at how we are using energy. However, I think
the “free market” has some clogs in it and caps at some
level are necessary to protect against the robber barons.
“
“As a native and life-long resident, I’m disgusted by
the prevailing attitudes of those outside the state
towards California. The state represents the 5th largest
economy in the world; we sink, the nation sinks. I think
that the government should monitor the pricing vs. what
they paid for (or the cost of generating) the power. I
just don’t feel we should be over charged. “
“Even if you believe it is some sort of divine
justice for Californians to pay more for their energy,
since California is the largest producer in the United
States of produce and other goods used and enjoyed by all
Americans, guess who else will feel the pain of these
“just” uncapped rate hikes?However, I am concerned that because of past industry
regulation, we may not have “perfect competition” among
producers. Thus, if we allow prices to go where they
will, I would only ask that there be some kind of
oversight to make sure the markets are not being
manipulated by the producers. “
“The government should ensure that the California
economy doesn’t spiral into a recession. Too much tough
love will punish all of us. That having been said, those
(unkind word deleted) in Sacramento should be crucified
for the colossal screwup that was deregulation in
California and the gov’t should prevent price gouging not
higher prices.That being said they do need some help from the feds
as they cannot do it by themselves. Gee it seems like we
just did this with the land debacle a few years ago. A
final item, no way those company execs should be getting
bonuses. “
There were a number of readers in the (just) “been
there” camp, such as:
“I just returned from San Francisco on Sunday night.
Although I was out there–in SF and Napa Valley–for a
week, I saw little evidence of conservation. There were a
few TV ads, but nobody really talked about the need to
conserve. Billboards are still lit, hotels don’t tell
customers to turn out lights. They need a rate hike.
“