The fund is designed to give participants of defined
contribution retirement plans, in both the public and private sectors, access
to investments managed by minority- and women-owned firms.
“While many plans have mandates for minority- and
women-owned investment managers, we want to go beyond what people are asking
for,” Eric Stevenson, vice president of Nationwide’s public sector retirement
business, tells PLANSPONSOR.
The fund is a balanced portfolio that invests in U.S. and
international stocks, small-cap stocks and fixed-income securities. It is
managed by four separate minority- and women-owned investment firms, including
Ariel Investments, Herndon Capital, Garcia Hamilton & Associates, and
Strategic Global Advisors.
“All of the firms involved are really top-tier, each of them
outstanding in their own segments,” says the Columbus, Ohio-based Stevenson. “We
are happy to contribute our distribution and infrastructure capabilities to
this already top-notch mix.”
He adds that the fund breaks down to 40% U.S. intermediate
fixed income, 32% U.S. stocks, 15% international funds and 13% U.S. small-cap
funds. In addition, the fund is available through institutional share classes and is available
to plans outside of those administered by Nationwide.
July
21, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – The average participant in the U.S. defined
contribution (DC) retirement system is 43 years old and has saved $91,000,
according to an industry benchmark report.
The Aon Hewitt 2014 Universe Benchmarks report shows U.S.
employees have about 9.1 years of tenure on average with their current employer.
More than three-quarters of employers in the U.S. rely on DC retirement plans as
the primary retirement income vehicle for their employees, the report shows,
putting an increasing amount of pressure on individual workers when it comes to
planning for retirement.
However, the 2014 report identifies several positive trends currently
taking shape in the DC industry. Participation rates across all companies and
industries continue to reach higher levels than ever before, Aon Hewitt says.
Additionally, the average plan balance at year-end 2013 significantly outpaced
the previous year-end record ($81,240) by a large margin—a feat fueled in large
part by the equity market bull run that has lasted through 2013 and into 2014. Expressed as a multiple of total participant pay, the average
plan balance is 1.2 times pay, up from 0.9 times pay in 2012.
Another positive finding shows the vast majority of plans
examined by Aon Hewitt continue to offer some type of employer-matching
contribution on participants’ elective deferrals, and 58% offered after-tax
contributions. The plans featured 20 investment options on average, though the
number is reduced to 15 when premixed portfolios are counted as a single option.
Most plans (91%) offered premixed funds and nearly six in 10 plans offer company
stock as an investment option. Thirty-nine percent offer self-directed
brokerage accounts.
Despite some positive findings, many challenges remain for
workplace retirement investors. Most participants are well behind the savings
milestones that they are generally encouraged to pursue to ensure adequate levels
of retirement income, according to the report. For example, many advisers push
for participants to defer at least 10% of annual salary into their DC plan
accounts, yet the average savings rate remains flat at 7.5%. While more
individuals increased their savings rates than decreased their savings rates during the sample time period, the amount of the increases was smaller than the
magnitude of the cutbacks—resulting in an average savings rate essentially unchanged
from the year before.
And only a small percentage of employees accessed their DC
plan account to increase their savings rate or rebalance their portfolio during
2013, Aon Hewitt says. Lack of engagement can be especially problematic during
extended bull markets, as outsized equity returns can cause unintentional style
drift within participant portfolios that are not regularly rebalanced (see “Equity
Overweighting Likely as DC Balances Hit Record Highs”).
Aon
Hewitt says the average participation rate across all companies was 78.3%, a
slight uptick from last year’s value of 78% and well above the 69.8% measure a
decade ago. This result was clearly aided by the increased use of automatic
enrollment features, the report shows. Indeed, plans with automatic enrollment
saw their average participation rate grow to 84.6%, up from 81.4% the prior
year. Conversely, the average participation rate among plans without
auto-enrollment actually decreased, from 63.5% to 62.4%.
The Aon Hewitt report shows in-plan Roth features, which allow participants to direct after-tax dollars into their accounts, continue to gain favor among participants. When a Roth feature was available to employees, 11% contributed after-tax dollars—up from 9.6%
last year and 8.1% in 2011 (see “Roth
Accounts Can Improve Retirement Outcomes”). The features are often attractive to employees who want to be able to maintain unrestricted access to some or all of the money directed towards retirement savings, the report suggests.
Premixed portfolios, both of the target-date and target-risk
varieties, are the default investment option for many plans, according to Aon
Hewitt, and thus they receive the lion’s share of new participant investments. As
a result, this year’s report shows an increase, on a participant-weighted
basis, in deferrals to these accounts—with 42.2% of participants’ portfolios invested in
premixed funds, compared with 39.7% the year before.
Driven in part by the growth in premixed portfolios and in part
by the equity rally over the past several months, the percentage of equities in
participants’ portfolios has reached an all-time high of 70.6%, up from 68.3% last
year and 59% in 2008. Participants continue to invest in their companies’
stocks, the report shows. Within plans allowing this investment, the average employee allocation to
company stock is currently about 12.9%, down modestly from 13.8% in 2013.
But even as account values grow strongly with the markets,
participant account activity remains relatively low, according to Aon Hewitt. In
2013, 16.1% of participants initiated a trade within their DC plan account. This
is greater than the 2012 value of 14.5%, but well below pre-2008 levels of
nearly 20%. Among individuals holding assets in premixed portfolios, only
slightly more than half (51.5%) are fully invested in these accounts—despite the
fact that most, if not all, are designed as stand-alone investment options.
More
than one-fourth (26.1%) of participants have a loan outstanding against their
DC account, and the average outstanding balance represents nearly 20% of the
total account.
All of this leads to a number of options to increase participation
and savings rates, Aon Hewitt says. Researchers share a list of best practices and
new ideas in the new report, as follows:
Enhance
automation – Automatic enrollment can greatly increase participation rates,
but low default contribution rates drag average savings rates down, Aon Hewitt
explains. This is further compounded when automatic enrollment is not paired
with automatic contribution escalation. The average savings rate among plans
without automatic enrollment is 7.9%, but declines to 6.6% when automatic
enrollment is present because too many sponsors set the default rate too low.
Setting defaults at robust levels or coupling automatic enrollment with
contribution escalation will close the gap between these rates.
Reenroll
nonparticipants – According to Aon Hewitt’s 2013 Trends & Experience in
Defined Contribution Plans report, 19% of companies enrolled eligible
nonparticipants when implementing automatic enrollment. Only 34% of this
fraction, in turn, did this so-called “backsweep” more than once. Employees can counter
the effects of inertia by bringing all nonparticipants into the plan and
forcing them to opt out regularly if they do not wish to participate.
Stretch
the match – Nearly one-third (30.3%) of participants save at a level
exactly equal to the maximum employer-matching contribution, showing that
employees are taking cues from plan sponsors on how much to save. In light of
this, employers can consider requiring participants to save more to receive the
same matching dollars. For example, employers offering a dollar-for-dollar
match on 3% could consider a 50-cents-per-dollar match on 6% to encourage greater
savings rates without increasing company costs to the plan.
Add Roth
provisions – In 2013, participants who used Roth savings features saved
more on average than their non-Roth-using counterparts—10.2% of salary vs. 7.7%,
respectively. Because every dollar in a Roth account yields more retirement
income than a dollar in a pre-tax account, individuals could potentially save more if
they change from pre-tax contributions to Roth contributions while
maintaining the same contribution
levels.
Target
communications – Plan sponsors can improve the relevance of communications
by targeting their message to the needs of the audience, Aon Hewitt says. For
instance, plan sponsors may consider sending specific communication to
nonparticipants with easy steps on how to enroll, and a different communication
to low savers letting them know they are not taking full advantage of the
resources available.
The report also shares best practices for improving
investment returns and diminishing risk within investment lineups. Aon Hewitt
urges plan sponsors and advisers to regularly review the funds they offer to
participants and to reenroll unsophisticated participants into premixed
portfolios. The report also urges plan officials to limit company stock as an
investment option and to evaluate lifetime income solutions for inclusion in the
plan.
To decrease plan leakage, sponsors and advisers can disallow
loans on employer money and also reduce the number of loans available to
individual participants. Adding a loan direct debit repayment option and
increasing loan origination fees may also be helpful, according to the report.
An
executive summary of Aon Hewitt’s 2014 Universe Benchmarks report is available here.
G&LR plays a major role in the intellectual life of the American GLBT community. Many readers tell us that we’re the only publication around in this digital age.Check out the Current Issue