NEA Hit with 403(b) Revenue Sharing Lawsuit

July 17, 2007 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Two teachers have accused the National Education Association (NEA) of a fiduciary breach for accepting millions of dollars in revenue sharing funds in exchange for exclusively endorsing the provider's 403(b) plan offering.

David Hamblen of  Diamond Springs,  California and Jerre Daniels, ofHall of Port Orchard , Washington filed the federal court lawsuit against the Washington, D.C.-based educators’ professional organization. The suit seeks class action status to represent the 57,000 teachers who it said have invested $1 billion in the NEA-endorsed 403(b) Valuebuilder  program.

Also named in the suit are plan providers Nationwide Life Insurance Company and Security Benefit Life Insurance Company and a variety of NEA officials.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Seattle law firm Keller Rohrback, representing the plaintiffs, charged that the NEA selected both the providers and the investment options based on their revenue sharing potential and not in the participants’ best interest. Participants ended up losing money, the suit charged, because the investment options selected had “excessive” fees, which ate into participants’ potential returns.

“Prudent and loyal fiduciaries, as opposed to conflicted and self-serving ones, would not have endorsed the plan nor encouraged participants to invest their hard-earned retirement savings in the plan,” the suit charged. “Indeed, the plan is widely regarded as one of the most expensive and worst performing retirement products offered to teachers and other school employees in the  United States.”

The suit charged that NEA and its benefits subsidiary should be considered fiduciaries because they endorsed the plan to members, worked closely with the providers to market and promote the plan, that the benefits unit – a registered investment adviser – tracks the plan performance and prepares monthly participant reports and that both NEA and the benefits subsidiary have representatives around the country to provide “face-to-face counseling.”

According to the suit, as a result, NEA and the benefits subsidiary “functioned as fiduciaries for the plan because they exercised discretionary authority or discretionary control with respect to the management of the plan (and) exercised authority and control respecting management or disposition of plan assets…”


Plaintiffs also alleged that the defendants never adequately disclosed the revenue sharing arrangements to participants.

Keller Rohrback announced in April that it was investigating the Valuebuilder program for potential Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) violations (See Keller Rohrback Targets 403(b) Program ).

Boston Firm Unveils Two 130/30 Offerings

July 16, 2007 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Independence Investments LLC, a Boston-based money manager, has unveiled Long/Short 130/30 U.S. Mid-Capitalization Core and Long/Short 130/30 U.S. Large Capitalization Value strategies to the institutional market.

According to a company news release, the 130/30 mid-cap core and large cap value strategies are managed by a team led by Senior Vice Presidents John C. Forelli,   Jay C. Leu, and Thomas D. Spicer,   who oversee the firm’s large cap and mid-cap equity strategies.

Independence ‘s long/short strategies maintain 100% net market exposure and generally include 125-175 long positions and 40-80 short positions, with holdings diversified by sector and industry, and active risk concentrated in stock selection.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“Our long/short 130/30 approaches are enhanced versions of our existing strategies and by eliminating long-only constraints we are able to make better use of all the information in our proprietary valuation models,” said Mark Lapman, chief executive officer and chairman of the investment committee in the announcement.

There will be a minimum account investment of $1 million, the company said.

More information is at   www.independence.com .

«