New, Flexible Student Loan Debt Repayment Program

Employees can determine how they want to allocate employer 401(k) matching dollars—be it to their retirement account, to their student loans or to a combination of both.

Thrive is offering a new student loan debt repayment program that enables employees to use existing employer 401(k) contribution matching dollars. Employees can determine how they want to allocate these dollars—be it to their retirement account, to their student loans or to a combination of both.

“Direct contributions to student loan debt by the employer can be a major expense for an organization, but we knew there had to be a better way,” says David Krasnow, president of Thrive. “I’d heard from my clients for the past several years [that] they needed a way to help employees struggling with student loan debt. Thrive provides exactly what organizations have been searching for and gives them an edge in hiring and retaining top talent.”

Thrive takes care of all of the administrative work, handling all back-end administration, including education, enrollment and making payments to each participant’s student loan provider from both employee and employer match. Thrive notes that currently, $24 billion in employer matching dollars is unused every year.

Furthermore, Thrive says that 44 million Americans have student loan debt amounting to $1.5 trillion, and $32 billion in student loan debt is in default. More than a million borrowers default every year. By 2023, it is expected that nearly 40% of borrowers will default on these loans.

Thrive also points to research that shows that 76% of employees say that student loan repayment programs would be a deciding factor in accepting a job, and 86% would feel compelled to stay with an employer that offered such a program for at least five years.

Plaintiffs Agree to Drop Empower ERISA Revenue-Sharing Lawsuit

Both parties agreed to dismiss the litigation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), and each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and expenses.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado has dismissed an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) lawsuit targeting Great-West, now doing business as Empower Retirement.

The decision notes that this outcome was reached voluntarily by the plaintiffs and defendants. Both parties agreed to dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs and other expenses of litigation.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The underlying lawsuit alleged that Empower Retirement entered into revenue-sharing agreements and similar arrangements with various mutual funds (and other investment advisers, instruments or vehicles), leading it to receive revenue-sharing payments for its own benefit in violation of ERISA. Plaintiffs suggested in the lawsuit that the revenue-sharing represented “kickback payments” and that they were part of a “pay-to-play scheme” in which Empower received payments from mutual funds in the form of 12b-1 fees, administration fees, service fees, sub-transfer agent fees and/or similar fees in return for providing the mutual funds with access to its retirement plan customers.

While little detail is included in the text of the dismissal notice, Empower shared the following statement regarding the dismissal: “Yesterday the court officially ended the case by approving a dismissal motion jointly filed by the parties. Great-West paid nothing to the plaintiff or his attorneys to achieve this result. Rather, plaintiff chose to voluntarily dismiss the case. It’s important to point out that the lawsuit was NOT filed by a plan sponsor or an adviser. In this situation, a single investor who was a participant in one of our plans filed the lawsuit. Great-West believed the case was without merit and we are pleased with this result. Our products comply with the law and our fees are reasonable and consistent with the rest of the industry.  We believe our innovative offerings help our clients reach their retirement goals.”

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois last year dismissed a similar lawsuit filed against Morningstar and Prudential.

«