New SEC Adviser Says Consumer Protection is Top Priority

Barbara Roper, who is known for her extensive work on financial services consumer protections as a leader of the Consumer Federation of America, is becoming a senior adviser to the leadership of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Last week, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it has appointed Barbara Roper to the role of senior adviser to SEC Chairman Gary Gensler.

In announcing her transition, the SEC says Roper will focus on issues relating to retail investor protection, including policy development and the oversight and examination of broker/dealers (B/Ds) and investment advisers. Such issues have come to define the efforts of the SEC—as well as the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)—under the Biden administration.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Roper heads to the SEC after a 35-year career at the Consumer Federation of America (CFA). In a statement to PLANSPONSOR, CFA Executive Director Jack Gillis says Roper has “likely been one of the most influential and effective protectors of the American investor in recent history.

“CFA is so proud of her efforts, as well as her selection to carry on her work at the SEC in support of SEC Chairman Gensler,” Gillis continues. “Her efforts to institutionalize a fiduciary responsibility in the financial marketplace is legendary and has served as the benchmark for those interested in a healthy, responsible and fair financial marketplace.”

Given the high praise from the head of the CFA, which aims to protect the interests of consumers across all sectors of the U.S. economy, it is reasonable to expect Roper will push for stronger rules and regulations during her forthcoming SEC tenure. Indeed, in a statement confirming Roper’s move, Gensler calls Roper “a champion for investors [who] will provide invaluable counsel on behalf of the American public.”

Gensler’s statement notes that he and Roper have substantial prior experience collaborating on ambitious, game-changing financial market policies. Most notably, both worked on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the major market reforms of the Dodd-Frank Act.

“I’m excited to join the SEC and Gensler’s leadership team,” Roper says of her move to the SEC. “I’ve dedicated my career to ensuring that our capital markets work for the average investor. With investor protection at the core of the SEC’s mission, I’m looking forward to bringing that same focus on the needs of individual investors to my work for the SEC.”

The SEC says that during her time at the CFA, Roper was recognized as a spokeswoman on investor protection issues, particularly the standards that apply to investment professionals whom investors rely on for advice and recommendations. For example, last year, Roper filed on behalf of the CFA a comment letter that sharply criticized the updated DOL fiduciary rule framework put in place under then-President Donald Trump and then-SEC Chairman Jay Clayton.

“This is a regulatory package being rushed through by the Department of Labor in the guise of improving retirement investment advice for workers and retirees,” Roper wrote. “It would instead benefit powerful financial firms at retirement savers’ expense. This regulatory package is a multibillion-dollar transfer of wealth from the retirement accounts of American working families to the wealthiest, most powerful financial firms. Instead of strengthening protections for workers and retirees, it makes it easier for financial firms to profit unfairly at their expense.”

Roper’s argument was that the DOL regulatory package consists of two components “which work together to make it easier for financial firms to evade any fiduciary obligation” and to weaken the fiduciary standard when it does apply.

Roper wrote that she thought the new package included “a final rule reinstating a 1975 regulatory definition of fiduciary investment advice that it is so riddled with loopholes that it enables firms to decide for themselves when and if they want to be held to a fiduciary standard, as well as a proposed new exemption, modeled on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s weak, non-fiduciary Regulation Best Interest [Reg BI], which would enable firms providing retirement investment advice to engage in a wide range of conflicts of interest without adequate safeguards to prevent those conflicts from tainting their advice.”

Though her comments broadly criticized the DOL’s decisionmaking, Roper did have a few positive points to make.

“Saying that rollovers in the context of an ongoing relationship constitute fiduciary investment advice is a small step in the right direction, but it is a far cry from unequivocally covering all rollovers in the definition, as the 2016 rule would have done,” she writes. “Similarly, saying that firms may need to do more than stick a disclaimer in six-point type in a disclosure document to avoid any fiduciary obligations is appropriate, as far as it goes, but it would still appear to leave firms plenty of room to come up with a way to avoid those obligations, even in circumstances when the retirement saver will rely on those recommendations as a primary basis for their investment decision.”

Beyond matters focused on Reg BI and the fiduciary duty of investment advisers, Roper might also contribute to the SEC’s revisiting of proxy voting rule changes made under the prior administration. Other potential focus areas, as denoted by the SEC’s 2021 examination priorities list, include financial services industry cybersecurity, operational resiliency, and the ongoing proliferation and development of financial technology innovations, including digital assets.

SURVEY SAYS: Workplace Rules on Vaccines and Masks

Plan sponsors and employees in the retirement plan industry share whether their companies are requiring vaccines and/or masks for the return to the office.

Last week, I asked NewsDash readers, “Does your company have a vaccine mandate?” I also asked if they are required to wear a mask in the office.

More than eight in 10 respondents (84%) work in a plan sponsor role, 13% work for or as recordkeepers/TPAs/investment consultants and 3% are advisers/consultants.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The vast majority of responding readers (85%) said their company does not have a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, 12% said their company does, and 3% reported that their company has a vaccine mandate, with regular testing required for the unvaccinated.

Responding readers were more likely to be required to wear a mask in the office. Nearly one-quarter (24%) indicated that masks are required in all areas of the office, and 29% said masks are required in some areas. Nearly one-third of respondents reported that they are not required to wear masks in the office, and 15% said they haven’t returned to the office yet.

The comments left by readers who chose to do so reflect that office rules about vaccines and masks are all over the place. Many indicated different rules about masks and returning to the office for the vaccinated than for the unvaccinated. Opinions about vaccine mandates vary as well; some like the idea in general, while others don’t, and some feel mandates should only apply in certain industries. Editor’s Choice goes to the reader who said, “Since we can all work from home, if anyone is apprehensive about going into the office, they should be able to continue to work from home.”

A big thank you to all who participated in our survey.

Verbatim

We are required to wear masks except when we are sitting at our desks. Personally, I am in favor of vaccine mandates for certain industries such as the airlines, health care, nursing homes, educational institutions including public schools and colleges, etc.

We have a small percentage of employees voluntarily wearing a paper mask (10% effective per experts). We would likely push back on any new government mandated policies.

Vaccines are encouraged, but not mandated. Masks must be worn in all public areas. You are not required to mask in your private office.

While we do not have a vaccine mandate, we will require proof of vaccination to return to the office. So, almost a mandate unless you are 100% remote. Also, when we return to the office, we are expected (but not required, I think) to wear a mask in common areas.

When we got to 80% vaccinated in the office, the mask mandate was removed. Now we are up to 97% vaccinated (voluntary so far).

You have to be vaccinated to come into the office. They have not said flat out everyone has to be vaccinated…then again, what has happened to our world that “we before me” is so controversial?

We follow CDC and local guidelines

At a time when companies cannot afford to lose critical talent it’s important to not put up barriers if they are not needed. At our office locations we are using a hybrid model allowing for employees to make their own decisions about where they work. When we work in the office, we are required to wear masks whether or not we are fully vaccinated. Given the transmissibility of the Delta variant, being fully vaccinated isn’t a guarantee of safety so there is no reason to force some to wear masks while others go unmasked.

Employees are strongly encouraged to be vaccinated and have been asked to attest to that fact. During our voluntary return to work period (between now and January), unvaccinated employees are not allowed in the building. Vaccinated individuals still must wear masks.

Since we can all work from home, if anyone is apprehensive about going into the office, they should be able to continue to work from home.

Our office is small, and all of us already got our vaccines. However, we have staff that are still fully remote to help stop the spread. It is interesting to see who is requiring and who isn’t, I think it is a smart and brave choice that some of these big companies/universities stated as such…if they can do it, so can small businesses.

I wish they would have a vaccine mandate.

Probably won’t do the mandate for our office. We still allow a lot of flexibility for individuals to work from home at their discretion, so it isn’t perceived as necessary.

Only those who have not been vaccinated are asked to wear a mask.

With respect to the mask mandate, I don’t have to wear it when I’m in my office but need to have it on when I leave my office and as soon as I enter the building. Fine with me.

A little common sense, like staying at home away from others when a person doesn’t feel well, seems to be a lot more effective than mandates.

The mask requirement has changed with COVID developments. We need to wear a mask when traveling through our building, and in restrooms, etc. but not at our desks, as we’ve done an every other week in the office schedule to maintain social distancing. We also have our temperature checked by a thermal detector when we enter the building. There was a period of time when vaccinated employees did not need to wear masks, but that has been reinstated with the Delta surge.

Our company did pay $100 for proof of vaccination. Approximately 85% of the employees are vaxxed in the corporate office (Dallas)

We are not mandating nor verifying vaccination status. Non-vaccinated employees are required to wear masks in common areas, and I do see some. Since we’re not verifying, you just don’t know. I would hope people are being honest, but it doesn’t seem to be an issue of science anymore.

We are requiring masks in the office except when seated at your desk. We have installed plexiglass barriers for open cubicles. We are currently working on a survey to determine vaccination status of our employees. We have returned to the office on a hybrid schedule, 2/3 days per week in office. Some local travel has resumed but minimal. We didn’t want to get to a mandate but keeping our options open. We are in Illinois.

We had mask mandating earlier in the year but that ended in the Spring. I look for it to be reinstated though. We are in Ohio, so I foresee the governor doing it.

We treat everyone as adults – if you aren’t fully vaccinated, we expect you to respect your co-workers and wear a mask. Not really sure how that’s working out for us in all honesty. I don’t see anyone walking around with masks.

I’m conflicted on vaccine mandates in a non-health care world. Looking at it from the public health view I 100% see that it’s necessary. Looking at it from a social/government aspect, the slippery slope is scary. In the health care world, if I found out one of my doctor’s offices didn’t have all patient facing employees vaccinated, I would be switching. If they don’t believe in the safety and efficacy of the vaccine by now, I don’t trust them to care for my family.

 

NOTE: Responses reflect the opinions of individual readers and not necessarily the stance of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) or its affiliates.

«