Northern Trust Recommends Pairing Automatic Enrollment With Escalation

The firm reflects on how advances of the PPA can be further strengthened.

Looking at improvements to retirement plans in the decade since the passing of the Pension Protection Act (PPA), Northern Trust Asset Management says they have been strengthened—but that people are still falling far short of being adequately prepared for retirement.

The firm interviewed 1,000 defined contribution (DC) plan participants and 100 DC plan sponsors, along with a diverse range of industry experts, and has come up with three ways retirement plans could be better positioned.

First, Northern Trust notes, while 52% of sponsors automatically enroll new hires, only 32% pair that with automatic escalation. Sixty-three percent of participants think they could afford to contribute 10% or more of their salaries to their 401(k) plan, but the same percentage said their plan’s deferral rate is below 10%.

“The benefit of using both auto features in tandem is clear,” says Gaobo Pang, head of investor analytics for retirement solutions, at Northern Trust Asset Management. “Among plan sponsors using auto enrollment and/or auto escalation, 64% think that participants using these features are better prepared for retirement. We believe it is time for plan sponsors to strongly consider the potential positive impact of adding auto escalation to their plans.”

Second, Northern Trust urges sponsors and advisers to consider various types of risk that participants face—not just market volatility risk. Fifty-three percent of participants and 46% of sponsors cited market risk as a key concern—but they also mention a variety of other risks, such as inflation, longevity and concentration risk. To mitigate these risks, the firm recommends that sponsors use target-date funds (TDFs) that consider all of these factors.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“Risks evolve over time, so it is crucial that plan sponsors select a default investment option that can help plan participants appropriately deal with a variety of risks,” says Susan Czochara, managing director of retirement solutions at Northern Trust Asset Management. “By constructing a robust default optin, such as a target-date fund that adjusts in line with investment goals, sponsors can help participants manage risk exposures.”

NEXT: Retirement income

Thirdly, Northern Trust learned from its participant survey that 84% are concerned about outliving their resources. Eighty-four percent of sponsors, as well, said that longevity risk is a serious problem for their participants. Eighty-six percent of sponsors and 87% of participants think their plan should include retirement income options specifically designed for retirees.

“Although default options work well for most participants during the accumulation phase, people’s needs, circumstances and priorities tend to be very different when they retire,” Czochara says. “In designing a menu of options, plan sponsors need to consider three primary concerns—efficiency, safety and flexibility—to address a variety of retirement income needs.”

As the white paper notes, “Ten years since the passage of the PPA, one thing is clear: DC plans can achieve more. The ideals at the heart of PPA have only been partially realized. As an industry, we can learn from the PPA’s success and missteps. Plan participants are still not effectively challenged to save. Take a closer look at how your target-date funds can address key risks for your participants. We believe income-focused investment options would offer retired participants a way to help ensure that they don’t outlive their savings. The retirement crisis the PPA sought to address 10 years ago still exists today—but the decade ahead is full of opportunity for improvement.”

The full white paper can be downloaded here.

(b)lines Ask the Experts – Will Deferral Limits Rise for 2017?

“I’ve already read some estimates that the current 402(g) limit on retirement plan elective deferrals will rise $500 in 2017, to $18,500, while the age-50 catch-up will remain unchanged at $6,000. Is this accurate?”

Michael A. Webb, vice president, Cammack Retirement Group, and David Levine, with Groom Law Group answer:  

Any estimates as to what the 402(g) elective deferral limit at this point are just that—estimates. The actual deferral limits for 2017 are not released until late October (last year the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced the limits on October 21). The reason the IRS cannot announce the limits sooner is that the indexing of such limits is based on the change in a price index (the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, or CPI-U.) from the beginning of the fourth quarter of the prior year through the end of the third quarter of the current year, and that third quarter figure is not released until October.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

However, there are entities that can and do make estimates based on the current unrounded 402(g) limits and the increase in the CPI-U from the fourth quarter of 2015 until now. These estimates are based on methodologies described in detail in a previous Ask the Experts column.   

Based on those methodologies, however, the Experts are not tremendously optimistic regarding limit increases in 2017. The reason for this is that price inflation remains relatively flat; the CPI-U actually DECREASED in July (the latest month for which figures are available as of this writing) and the figure has increased only a little more than 1% since the beginning of the fourth quarter of last year. Currently the 402(g) unrounded index figure is $18,158. It would need to increase at least $342, or nearly 2%, in order to exceed the $18,500 figure necessary for the 402(g) elective deferral limit to be increased to $18,500. Though certainly not impossible that the CPI-U will increase year-over-year by the necessary 2% that would result in an $18,500 elective deferral limit in 2017 (we still have August and September to factor into the equation) it appears to become less likely with each passing month.

One thing that is fairly certain at this point is that, barring a spike in consumer prices, the maximum amount of the age-50 catch-up is unlikely to increase from its current figure of $6,000 in 2007. The reason for this is that the unrounded limit is $6,053; it would need to increase $447, or more than 7% for the index to increase to $6,500. It is almost certain that there would not be such a large increase in the CPI-U that would be sufficient to increase this limit.

So don’t be disappointed if 2017 is another year where the elective deferral limits do not increase. However, it is important to emphasize that nothing is official regarding the 2017 deferral limits until such limits are actually released by the IRS in late October.

Thank you for your question!

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.  

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to rmoore@assetinternational.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future Ask the Experts column.

«