NQDC Plans: An Opportunity for Improving Retention, but Underutilized by Participants

A vast majority of employers feel remaining competitive in the race for talent is more expensive than ever, and businesses are turning to creative offers to keep executives satisfied without breaking the bank, according to NFP.

A key factor in retaining top executive talent is offering a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, according to 92% of employers who participated in NFP’s recent Executive Benefits Trend Study. 

However, NFP, a benefits consultant, wealth manager and retirement plan adviser, found that while NQDC plans are appealing to companies of all sizes, they appear to be underutilized, with eligibility rates outpacing population and few companies planning to make near-term changes. 

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

An NQDC plan essentially allows an employee to earn wages, bonuses or other compensation in one year but receive the earnings—and defer income tax on them—in a later year. With any type of deferral, the plan sponsor can design the plan to specify whether the participants’ money is available to them before retirement or at separation of service. 

Out of the 98 executive benefits employers who partner with NFP for executive compensation packages, only 32% said participation in their NQDC plan had increased since 2020, and 75% said they do not plan to make any changes to their NQDC plan. Meanwhile 45% said eligibility has increased since 2020; NFP argued that increased communication can help close the gap between eligibility and participation. 

“Nonqualified deferred compensation is an essential lever in creating executive benefits programs that enhance retention of top talent, but the plans are being underutilized,” said Joe Carpenter, head of executive benefits at NFP, in a press release. “Companies need to tailor their plans to the unique needs of their executives and untangle the complicated plan details for them. Continuous plan communication and knowledge-sharing also matters as it helps drive how executives perceive the value of the benefit.” 

The majority of employers surveyed (79%) allow participants to defer their base salary, and a little more than half (58%) allow participants to defer annual bonuses. Almost 60% of employers contribute a discretionary and/or percentage of the employee contribution on top of that.  

Carpenter added that there are several untapped benefits that employers can offer to their executives, such as supplemental executive medical insurance and college tuition for children, that can set them apart from others. 

However, 85% of employers said they feel remaining competitive in the executive benefits market is “more expensive than ever,” and many businesses are resorting to creative offers to keep their executives satisfied at a manageable cost.  

According to PLANSPONSOR’s 2023 Defined Contribution Plan Benchmarking Report, which surveyed 2,562 plan sponsors from a variety of industries, 7.9% of plan sponsors reported offering an NQDC plan. Plan sponsors that had greater than $1 billion in DC plan assets were the most likely to have an NQDC plan, with 42.9% offering one.  

NFP also found that executive retirement behaviors are evolving in opposite directions, with one-third retiring later and one-quarter retiring sooner. But regardless of when these executives plan to retire, most feel behind in preparation.  

“Businesses have found deferred compensation plans to be highly effective in preparing their executives for retirement, and many offer NQDC plans primarily for this purpose, but they need to go a step further by tailoring plans to the unique needs of executives,” the report stated. 

NFP recommended that plan sponsors revisit their executive benefits early and often, look beyond traditional offerings to come up with more creative benefits that will set them apart and optimize their executive benefits package to counter rising costs in an unsettled economy.  

Examining the Effects of Changes to UK Auto-Enrollment

A study examined what would happen if the minimum earning threshold for UK auto-enrollment was removed, identifying positive and negative effects.  

Eliminating the U.K. trigger for auto-enrollment into workplace pension contributions—which currently requires an individual earn more than 10,000 pounds per year—would have a significant positive effect on the retirement outcomes for 90% of individuals, new research shows. However, the change mulled over by lawmakers across the pond may also have a negative impact on a small but considerable segment of the population, according to modeling and research commissioned by the Pension and Lifetime Savings Association and carried out by the Pensions Policy Institute.

The published report—“Every little helps: Should low earners be encouraged to save?”—explored if removing the 10,000-pound earning requirement would cause harm to the lower earners by squeezing their current income and living standards, according to a press release that accompanied the research findings.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“Our study, which examined the potential risks of financial disadvantages prompted by saving for retirement when a low earner, suggests that this change may have a negative impact on a relatively small but still considerable segment of the population, specifically 300,000 individuals out of a total low-earning working population of 3.17 million,” wrote PSLA researchers in the section about initial policy implications and questions raised by the research.

For companies trying to encourage employees to save more for retirement, some plan design features are available that, according to analysis from Vanguard, have proven to increase participation. Vanguard credited plan sponsors’ adoption of automatic enrollment and automatic escalation for U.S. deferral rates staying steadfast through the pandemic, the ensuing market volatility and recent spiking inflation, according to the 2022 PLANSPONSOR Participant Survey.

Among retirement plan participants, auto-enrollment has increased in popularity in the U.S.: For retirement plan participants surveyed in late 2022, 71% agreed employers should auto-enroll workers at a 10% default, compared with 47% in 2021 and 46% in 2020, according to American Century Investments 10th Annual Retirement Savers Survey.

In the U.S., the Pension Protection Act passed by Congress in 2006 allowed employers to auto-enroll workers in a workplace retirement plan. Congress followed up with the Setting Every Community up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 and the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 to improve on the PPA, creating more incentives and requirements for plan auto-features to drive greater retirement outcomes for sponsors and participants.

SECURE 2.0 will require new retirement plans, from 2025 on, to auto-enroll qualified employees at a contribution rate between 3% and 10% of pay. Plan sponsors must then escalate the contribution rate by 1% annually until it reaches a minimum of 10% or a maximum of 15%, at the discretion of the sponsor. Participating workers can opt out of the structure and select different rates, but absent an expressed preference, sponsors must follow the automated structure as the default.

Auto-enrollment features in employer-sponsored defined contribution retirement plans are favored for removing a barrier to low- and moderate-income workers enrolling and contributing to a retirement plan and for driving higher worker contributions to workplace retirement plans, agreed Rich Johnson, senior fellow and director of the Program on Retirement Policy at the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank for economic and social policy research.

“Research has shown overwhelmingly that the best way to get lower- and moderate-income workers to participate in a [retirement] plan is to just automatically put them in the plan,” he said previously.

The U.K.’s earnings threshold for auto-enrollment, currently 10,000 pounds, was included in the Pensions Act 2008 (implemented in 2012) to protect the lowest-earning workers from saving for the future when they might be better off having more money in their pockets today, the study noted. Amending the U.K. Pensions Act of 2008 would enable the U.K.’s Secretary of State to remove the Lower Earnings Limit for qualifying earnings.

«