Passive TDFs Continue Market Gains Against Active TDFs

Target-date funds invested passively extended an asset winning streak over their active-suite counterparts, new research found.

Passive target-date fund suites are growing faster than active series, while TDF providers that are also recordkeepers continue to dominate the market and TDFs based on collective investment trust investments are growing significantly faster than those based on mutual funds, new research shows.

TDFs invested in passively managed underlying funds captured 60% of TDF retirement assets in 2022, up from 51% five years earlier, found a new report from Sway Research, an independent provider of retirement market data and analysis.

Assets in passive TDFs grew 14% annually, compared to 4% for active target-date suites over the five years, according to the research report, “The State of the Target-Date Market: 2023—Examining Asset Trends Across Providers, Products, Vehicles, Management Styles and Glide Path Structures.”

“Low costs and solid performance drive target-date sales [and] the low-cost side of this equation greatly favors target-date series that invest in passively managed underlying funds,” says Chris Brown, founder and principal at Sway Research, via email. “The push for low-cost products also favors target-dates that utilize collective investment trusts over mutual funds.”

As with most asset classes, returns for target-date suites were decidedly negative in 2022. Though active TDF series produced the lowest average asset-weighted 2022 return of -16.6% (only slightly worse than hybrid at -16.46% and passive at -16.48%), over three-, five-, and 10-year periods, active TDF series produced the highest returns, trailed by passive series, with hybrid in third, Sway found.

At the start of this year, active target-dates held 31% of defined contribution assets under management, down from 33% a year earlier, while hybrid offerings held 9%, the research found.

While hybrid target-date funds—that blend active and passive strategies—grew 15%, that group of funds grew from a small beginning asset base, Brown noted in a press release.

Given the trend toward passive target-date primacy, actively managed target-date assets could be eclipsed twofold, Brown stated.

Passive target-dates may be attracting greater assets because the series retain a “massive” fee advantage, Sway Research stated.

On an asset-weighted basis, the expense ratios for TDFs fell in 2022, the Sway data showed. At year-end, the median asset-weighted ratio of an active target-date mutual fund series was 1.4 times the median hybrid series and 2.7 times the median passive series; the asset-weighted expense ratio of an average active mutual fund TDF series dropped to 57 basis points from 58 basis points; and hybrid TDF series fees fell to 41 bps from 43.

Meanwhile, passive target-date fees were substantially lower and decreased in 2022 to 9bps from 11bps, according to Sway Research.

The research also showed that 2022’s market decline did little to shift dominance of the TDF market from defined contribution recordkeepers. Sway found that firms with both asset management and defined contribution recordkeeping functions control 83 cents of every dollar invested in TDFs, and the 10 largest TDFs control 94.1% of the AUM, up from 91.7% in 2017.

In addition, Sway found that assets in mutual fund-based TDFs are shrinking, relative to assets in collective investment trust-based TDFs. Mutual-fund based TDFs ended 2022 below not only 2021’s level, but 2020’s level as well. At the end of 2017, mutual fund-based TDFs held 63% of all target-date assets, compared to 37% for CIT-based products. By the start of 2023, this mix was 52% to 48%, mutual fund to CIT.

At the current rate of change, Sway predicted, assets in CIT TDFs will top those in mutual fund TDFs later this year.

Over the last five years, assets in CIT-based TDFs increased an average of 16% annually, compared to just 6% growth for mutual fund-based solutions.

The annual Sway Research report is based on a proprietary database of mutual fund and collective investment trust target-date portfolio and asset data, which included 130 target-date solutions that held assets at the end of 2022, across more than 6,000 mutual fund share classes and CITs, according to Sway Research.  

U.S. Corporate Pension Funding Remains Largely Unchanged in January

Funding levels improved most for pension funds that have significant weighting towards equities, said Agilis.

A lower discount rate and higher equity returns left funding levels in January similar to where they finished the year in 2022. Analysis firms disagreed in some respects, however, as some found that corporate pensions posted negative month-to-month results in January, while others found positive month-to-month results.

Pension funding improved modestly in January, as higher stock markets more than offset the impact of lower interest rates, according to October Three’s pension finance update.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Each model allocation at the firm finished the month up 1% in funding status. The firm’s traditional 60/40 portfolio gained 6%, on its assets during January, while the conservative 20/80 portfolio added more than 4% to its assets.

The gain was based on the strong month stocks enjoyed across the board in January, as a diversified stock portfolio gained more than 8% over the month. Additionally, interest rates fell and credit spreads narrowed; treasury yields declined 0.3%, while corporate bond yields fell 0.4% during January. As a result, bonds gained between 4% and 7% last month, with long-duration bonds performing best.

Discount rates effectively moved 0.4% lower last month, and October Three expects that most pension sponsors will use an effective discount rate in a range between 4.6% and 4.9% to measure pension liabilities.

Aon, in its pension risk tracker, found that the aggregate funded ratio for U.S. pension plans in the S&P 500 had increased from 93.6% to 94.3%, in January. Pension asset returns were up significantly throughout January, ending the month with a 5.3% return. The month-end 10-yr Treasury rate decreased 36 basis points relative to the December 2022 month-end rate, and credit spreads remained constant.

This combination resulted in a decrease in the interest rates used to value pension liabilities, from 4.68% to 4.32%. Given a majority of the plans in the U.S. are still exposed to interest-rate risk, the increase in pension liability caused by decreasing interest rates partially offset the positive effect of asset returns on the funded status of the plan.

According to estimates from Insight Investments, the average funded status improved by 0.4%—from 102.1% to 102.5%—in January. The average discount rate fell by 38 bps, from 5.11% in December 2022 to 4.74% in January; the change in rates is mostly due to the change in the risk-free rate. Insight Investments data pegged assets in the portfolio increasing by 4.9% and liabilities increasing by 4.4% during January.

LGIM America’s Pension Solutions Monitor, which estimates the health of a typical U.S. corporate defined benefit pension plan, estimated that pension funding ratios increased in January,  to 99.8% from 98.3%.

“Equity markets rallied through the month with global equities and the S&P 500 gaining 7.2% and 6.3%, respectively. Plan discount rates were estimated to have decreased roughly 47 basis points over the month with the Treasury component decreasing 37 basis points and the credit component tightening 10 basis points,” the pension solutions monitor stated in its report. “Given broad-based asset allocation shifts from the market these last few years, we’ve adjusted the standard pension portfolio from a 60/40 equities/credit allocation to a 50/50 asset allocation. Plan assets with our recalibrated traditional “50/50” asset allocation increased 6.9% while liabilities increased by only by 5.3%, resulting in a 1.5% increase in funding ratios by January month-end. Strong equity performance overcame increases in plan liabilities, resulting in an increase in the average funding ratio.”

Wilshire’s U.S. Corporate pension funded status estimates concluded that U.S. corporate pension plans increased by an estimated 1.3 percentage points month-over-month, ending the month at 98.8%. The monthly change in funded ratio resulted from Wilshire’s projections that portfolios experienced a 5.6% increase in asset values, offset by a 4.1% increase in liability values. Wilshire estimated that funded statuses have increased by 2.9% over the trailing 12 months.

Milliman, in its latest Milliman 100 Pension Funding Index, found that ratios fell from 110% to 109.3% during January. The drop was due to a 37-bps decline in the monthly discount rate, from 5.22% in December 2022 to 4.85% at the end of January. As a result, the PFI projected benefit obligation rose to $1.387 trillion at the end of January, from $1.331 trillion at the end of December 2022. This outpaced investment gains of 3.97%, which lifted the market value of plan assets by $51 billion.

Looking forward, under an optimistic forecast—with rising interest rates (reaching 5.40% by the end of 2023 and 6.00% by the end of 2024) and asset gains (9.9% annual returns)—the funded ratio would climb to 122% by the end of 2023 and 138% by the end of 2024. Under a pessimistic forecast—a 4.30% discount rate at the end of 2023 and 3.70% by the end of 2024, with 1.9% annual returns—the funded ratio would decline to 100% by the end of 2023 and 91% by the end of 2024.

According to insights from Agilis’ January 2023 U.S. pension briefing, shared plan funded statuses were likely little-changed for many plans, though systems that have a significant weighting towards equities saw their funding statuses improve, because equity markets were up 7% to 8%, and their discount rates fall, with the FTSE Pension Liability Index down about 0.33%.

“As we point out, 2023 has had a decent start for pension plan sponsors with a well-diversified portfolio. Even though discount rates pulled back and liability values increased as the long end of the yield curve came down and investment grade credit spreads narrowed, equity markets increased. Optimism that inflation has peaked, and that the Fed would start to slow down its rate increases pushed equity markets higher and long-term interest rates lower,” Agilis managing director Michael Clark said in a statement. “All eyes are on the Fed as it is expected to continue increasing interest rates in 2023 to try to slow down inflation and the overall economy and to do so as a soft landing. Despite headline layoffs, the January jobs report surprised many with how strong job growth was and unemployment fell to its lowest levels since the 1960s. This good news has investors fearing the Fed may need to raise rates further than expected and is fueling fears of recession.”

WTW, in its’ pension finance watch, saw its WTW Pension Index decrease in January to 100.0, reflecting a decrease in funding status of 1.3% for the period; an increase in liabilities, due to a decrease in discount rates, was partially offset by strong investment returns.

Yields on long high-quality corporate bond indices decreased an average of 38 bps. These moves were followed by decreases in long Treasury rates, with yields on 10- and 30-year Treasury bonds decreasing by 36 and 32 bps, respectively. The fixed-income investments of the benchmark portfolio had a positive return at 2.7%, with Long Treasury Bonds and Long Corporate Bonds experiencing the largest gain.

 

«