Pentegra Retirement Services announced the addition of
Philip Gould, serving as a regional director for qualified plan sales.
Gould brings
over 15 years of experience to Pentegra, a provider of retirement plan and
fiduciary outsourcing solutions. He is tasked with leading business development
efforts in Texas markets.
Pete Swisher, Pentegra senior vice president of national sales, says Gould’s knowledge of qualified retirement plan solutions and strong
relationships will be instrumental in expanding the scope, reach and
marketing of Pentegra’s retirement plan, fiduciary outsourcing and multiple employer plan solutions.
Gould most recently worked with The Capital Group of
Companies in San Antonio, Texas, as a retirement plan sales consultant. He has
also held positions with Bisys Retirement Services and Mellon Financial. He
will report directly to Swisher in his new role with Pentegra.
The Future of Technology and Services for Retirement Plans
Many retirement plan service providers are investing in technology to link and leverage data from banks, insurers and other places where participants hold assets outside their retirement accounts.
“I’m expecting differentiation in the coming years that will
see leading plan provider Internet sites become highly responsive and customizable
for the individual participant,” says Gary Josephs, managing principal at Retirement
Benefits Group.
Josephs tells PLANSPONSOR that significant industry attention
is fixed on the notion of creating “a holistic eMoney overlay right inside the
plan portal that says, here is your net worth; here is your gap analysis and the
next steps for closing it; here is your retirement savings portfolio and asset
allocation; here is anticipated Social Security and home equity or inheritance wealth.
One day all of it will be tied together in the standard offering.”
Josephs says participants have already benefitted strongly
from digital innovation at retirement plan providers, and that it’s not hard to
picture what the client service portal of the future could look like. He believes
providers will eventually create a digital plan experience for participants similar
to that of today’s iPhone or iPad user.
“You’ll be able to drag and drop different applications and
tools that you want to see on your retirement plan portal homepage, for
example, and to hide the things that aren’t as relevant,” Josephs explains. “Retirement
plan investors each have different needs in terms of education, portfolio support,
and so on. Our expectation is that the provider technology will grow to meet
the demand for convenience and ease of use.”
Of course, client-facing technology innovation will have to
be supported by back office investment and IT administration. Josephs expects
multiple operating models to continue in this area—some providers opt to invest
and create their own systems, while others depend on technology partnerships or
licensing agreements to get the job done with external expertise. Less important than having either a
proprietary or outsourced technology system is having a nimble system, he
notes.
“There
is one provider out there that has a more internal, home-server based system to
which they can make changes a lot quicker than others, and it’s being turned
into an advantage,” Josephs says. “They are not in this big batch format that
requires a long time to make changes to the client facing portal. Changes can
be rolled out widely or narrowly for different sets of clients, and in real
time. I can see more and more of that going on in the future.”
Bob Guillocheau, CEO of Ascensus, also feels we are at the front end of promising technology trends that are reshaping features of the retirement plan services marketplace. He says advisers and plan recordkeeping providers are gaining powerful tools that give sponsor clients unprecedented insight into the inner workings of their employee benefits packages.
As Guillocheau explains, Ascensus delivers services to retirement plans through a network of advisers, some longtime retirement specialists and some new entrants into the plan environment. Whether a given adviser is serving one plan sponsor or many, Guillocheau says it’s key to be armed with the right data and reporting. “For us, this need is served by the Plan Illustrator,” he explains.
The illustrator tool is an automated report that goes out quarterly
to the plan adviser network. Each adviser gets talking points and important
pieces of data presented as a plan health check, to be delivered to the sponsor
in an easily approached form.
“This health check pulls together highlights from the recordkeeping
data, all the fund performance and relevant market data, as well as demographic
information on things like participant risk outlook and age—all the stuff the
sponsor and adviser want to discuss at the regular meetings of the 401(k)
committee,” Guillocheau says, adding that technology innovation of this kind makes it
easier for advisers to present themselves as “retirement specialists.”
“We have all seen the industry research showing how more plan
sponsors are seeking retirement plan specialists,” he continues. “The advisers
that are most effective today are very fluent in plan design, and they can
speak broadly about the benefit that an employer is trying to bring to its
employees. Sponsors are waking up to the fact that the plan design is
critically important, just as important as the investment lineup in a lot of
ways. The specialization trend is very big.”
Josephs shares that sentiment, adding that high performing
retirement specialists see themselves as more than just plan optimization
consultants.
“What I’ve seen in the past was that an advice or consulting
provider came in, did the plan optimization study, presented it, and then it
immediately went away,” Josephs says. “More and more I believe we are going to
see lasting, dedicated [Employee Retirement Income Security Act] consulting
that is much more of an ongoing partnership. Advisers will be asked to commit to
coming back in, say, every year or six months to provide additional consulting
and optimization for the plan.”
Guillocheau says the increasing competitiveness of the
retirement plan services marketplace will accelerate this trend. He predicts there will also be increasing pressure on traditional compensation arrangements tied to sales commissions from investment fund companies. As advisers and sponsors lengthen and deepen their relationships, more will rely on flat fees that encompass more than just the investment lineup and portfolio services.
“Along
with all this comes a shift in the amount of plans being sold today where the
pricing is asset based,” he says. “We expect more arrangements where the
adviser’s compensation is an arms-length transaction with the plan sponsor, and
it’s not necessarily going to be tied to assets or commissions from the investment fund
companies. You will see a lot more low-cost institutional share classes being
deployed as well, because the advisers are being called on to talk about the total cost
of ownership of the retirement plan in a way that is a lot more transparent
than it has been in the past.”