Plaintiffs Claim AME Church Plan Is Subject to ERISA

A consolidated class action complaint claims that the church’s 401(k) plan elected to be governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. 

Members of the African Methodist Episcopal Church have filed a consolidated class action complaint alleging retirement plan fiduciary breaches under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

The complaint follows a proposed class action lawsuit against named plan fiduciaries that was filed earlier this year. The lawsuit alleges fiduciary breach charges against the defendants, the African Methodist Episcopal Church Ministerial Retirement Annuity Plan; the third-party administrator of the plan, Newport Group; Symetra Life Insurance Company; and Reverend Jerome Harris, the executive director of the AMEC Department of Retirement Services from 2000 until June 2021, among others.

“For nearly two decades, defendants breached their fiduciary duties and engaged in negligent conduct—permitting a single individual to exercise unsupervised control in managing the African Methodist Episcopal Church Ministerial Retirement Annuity Plan and the fund of retirement assets associated with the plan,” the complaint states. “Defendant Harris made a series of self-dealing, illegal, and/or risky investments without any oversight from the African Methodist Episcopal Church and its ministers.”

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The defendants are being sued for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and unjust enrichment, among other allegations.

“Plaintiffs bring this class action on behalf of AMEC ministers and other employees who, as a result of defendants’ catastrophic failures to protect their retirement accounts in the plan, collectively lost tens of millions of dollars in career retirement savings,” the complaint states.

ERISA or Not ERISA?

At issue in the lawsuit is the AMEC 401(k) retirement plan for eligible employees. The church 401(k) plan was established in 2003 for eligible employees who wished to contribute savings for their retirement, the complaint states.

In 2005, AMEC consolidated various governing documents of three retirement plans into a single 401(k) plan, the Ministerial Annuity Plan of the African Methodist Episcopal Church sponsored by AMEC. Earlier iterations had established three retirement plan levels.

Per IRS rules, church plans are often not subject to rules and regulations under ERISA.

According to the IRS, “A plan that meets the definition of a church plan in IRC Section 414(e) is exempt from certain requirements imposed on other tax-qualified retirement plans under the Internal Revenue Code. However, a church plan sponsor can elect under IRC Section 410(d) to have the plan treated as though it were not an exempt church plan.”

The complaint similarly states, “As a church plan, the plan is exempted from ERISA unless it affirmatively elected to be governed by ERISA.”

Plaintiffs allege that the church plan is an ERISA plan because the summary plan document clearly states that it is. They further allege that the AMEC 401(k) retirement summary plan document—located on the church’s website for church employees—is the only summary plan description issued by AMEC.

“On its first page, the plan’s SPD declares that ‘the plan is subject to federal laws, such as ERISA (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act),’” the complaint states. “In addition, the Summary Plan Description, as well as other written communications to the church’s clergy and other employees, including the Church’s Doctrine and Discipline—published every four years to provide clergy and church members updated information on church beliefs, teachings and practices—all expressly state that the plan is an ERISA plan, and is to be operated in full compliance with ERISA.”

The consolidated class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. A request for comment to the AMEC Department of Retirement Services was not returned.

Large Employers Increase Focus on Workers’ Health and Well-Being

Despite rising health care costs, employers expect to cover 82% of the cost of employee coverage in 2022, up from 80% the year before, research shows.   

Large employers are integrating employees’ health and well-being into their overall workforce strategy, new data show.

The Business Group on Health’s 2023 Large Employers’ Health Care Strategy and Plan Design Survey found that 65% of large plan sponsor respondents said the role of health and well-being is integral to their workforce strategy, compared with 42% in 2021 and 45% in 2020.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The survey asked employers whether they viewed their company’s health and well-being strategy as integral to, a consideration in or separate from their workforce strategy.

“We’ve seen employers really take a more strategic view to health and well-being and their investments in that for the long term,” Ellen Kelsay, president and CEO of Business Group on Health, said at a press briefing on the results. “Certainly, the pandemic exacerbated and magnified those efforts, but we don’t think that this jump is notable solely for the pandemic reason, and expect to see it continue to stay at these levels.”

The survey found that 32% of employers view health and well-being as a consideration in their workforce strategy in 2022, compared with 45% in 2021 and 49% in 2020. Additionally, only 3% view health and well-being as separate from workforce strategy, compared with 13% in 2021 and 6% in 2020. Further back, in 2018, 20% of employers viewed health and well-being as separate from workforce strategy, according to the Business Group on Health.   

The COVID-19 pandemic likely affected employers’ efforts to support their employees’ health and well-being, but large plan sponsors are also integrating these efforts into workforce strategy to attract and retain talent in a tight labor market, Kelsay noted.

Employers view investing in employee health and well-being as “part and parcel to organizational performance, driving a healthier workforce and improved performance, engagement and overall business outcomes,” she said.

Expected COVID-19 Effects

The Business Group’s research found that employers expect there will be ongoing effects from COVID-19 on employer-provided health care. Since the onset of the pandemic, employers have experienced the impacts of long-term mental health issues and the need for increased medical services because of delayed care during the pandemic, data show.

The research found that 44% of employers are currently seeing the impact of mental health issues—
categories included depression, anxiety and substance abuse disorders resulting from the pandemic—while 44% anticipate seeing an impact, 4% do not anticipate an effect and 8% didn’t know. (The survey notes that because of rounding, percentages may not add up to 100%.)

In addition, employers are expecting an increase in the need for medical services due to delayed care; 43% of plan sponsors are already seeing an impact from the delay, while 39% anticipate seeing an effect and 11% do not expect an effect. Meanwhile, increased disability claims due to long COVID-19 are affecting 21% of employers, and an additional 24% expect an impact.  

Health Care Costs

The Business Group survey also found that large employers expect median health care costs to rise 6% after plan design changes in 2023, compared with the 5% projected for 2022.

Employers’ median health care costs were flat from 2019 to 2020, “which was quite an anomaly and stood out with us at the time but was probably understandable in the context of a pandemic,” Kelsay said. The median cost increase in 2021, the last year for which data is available, was 8.2%, which Kelsay called a “boomerang” from the previous years. 

“Employers are projecting a return to more normal or historical trend rates in 2022 and 2023,” Kelsay said.  

The Business Group on Health survey was conducted in June and July, with 135 large employers representing 18.3 million U.S. employees.

«