Plan Reimbursements to Designated Beneficiaries Not Excludable from Gross Income

August 14, 2006 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Amounts paid to an employee under a reimbursement plan are not excludable from
gross income if the plan permits amounts to be paid as medical benefits to a designated beneficiary (other than the employee's spouse or dependents of the employee), according to a recent IRS ruling.

The ruling   said that none of the payments made from the reimbursement plan during the plan year to any person, including amounts paid to reimburse the medical expenses of an employee or the employee’s spouse or dependents, is excludable from the gross income.

The IRS considered an employer who sponsors a reimbursement plan that reimburses an employee solely for substantiated medical care expenses (as defined in Section 213(d) ). The plan provides reimbursements up to an annual maximum dollar amount for the coverage period and reimburses medical expenses only to the extent that the expenses have not been reimbursed from any other plan.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Under the plan, each employee’s unused reimbursement amount available at the end of each plan year is rolled over for use in other plan years.  

The plan reimburses the substantiated medical care expenses of both current and former employees (including retired employees), their spouses and dependents. The plan also reimburses the substantiated medical care expenses of the surviving spouse and dependents of a deceased employee. If any of those parties die, the reimbursement money goes to the beneficiary named by the employee. The beneficiary doesn’t get the fair market value of the reimbursement, but instead it is taxable.

This ruling applies to reimbursement plans that hold a provision on or before August 14, 2006 which says that upon the death of a deceased employee’s surviving spouse and last dependent, or upon the death of the employee, if there is no surviving spouse or dependents, any unused reimbursement amount will be paid as a reimbursement of substantiated medical care expenses of a beneficiary designated by the employee. The ruling is effective for plans years that begin after December 31, 2008.

CPAs and CFPs Top Trust/Ethics List

December 20, 2005 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - A new survey found that CPAs and certified financial planners were the easiest to trust and showed the most ethical behavior of all the professionals providing financial advice to individuals.

A news release from AFA Financial Group also said that those at the other end of the ethics and trust scale included television and radio show financial hosts.

The announcement said the respondents were asked to rate 11 professions using a five-point scale ranging from “not trustworthy at all” to “extremely trustworthy.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The press release said that CPAs had the highest overall score and were selected more than any other profession as being “extremely trustworthy” (22.77%). Certified financial planners had the second highest overall score and were selected as being “extremely trustworthy” by 18.32%. Meanwhile, financial television show hosts attracted the lowest ranking, with only 2.77% calling them “extremely trustworthy.”

More than 61% of respondents said that they would be comfortable with a CPA, who is licensed to provide financial products/services also giving them personal investment advice. Some 83.84% indicated that they would be comfortable with the CPA also providing financial advice after full and complete disclosure of his/her commission.

Of the survey respondents who have employed a certified financial planner (CFP) in the last five years, 17.82% said they were “extremely satisfied” and 58.08% said they were “satisfied” with the CFP’s performance.

When asked “how do you primarily make financial investment decisions,” 30% identified “with counsel from a certified financial planner” and 16% “with counsel from an accountant or CPA.” The most frequently identified source of outside input was “from family and friends.”

Amplitude Research conducted the survey using its Panelspeak Web panel December 15 to 17, 2005. Respondents had investments besides their primary residence (stocks, bonds, mutual fund, money market fund, real estate, or individual retirement account). Some 55% of the respondents had household income over $60,000, with 20% having household income over $100,000. There were 1,007 survey completions.

For an executive summary contact Michael Krems of KremsPR on behalf of AFA Financial Group at 805-496-8166 or send an email to  krems@kremspr.com .

«