Plan Sponsors Move Forward (Slowly) With SECURE 2.0 Provisions

While catch-up contributions and cash-out thresholds have been adopted widely, take-up is more ponderous for student loan matching and emergency withdrawal flexibility.

More than two years after the passage of the sweeping SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, plan sponsors are still talking about many of the optional provisions—and implementing some of them.  

“It has a long tail, and there are provisions that go into effect—or elements of provisions that go into effect—all the way through 2032,” says Barbara Rayll, vice president of products and solutions management at Corebridge Financial. “I think we’re really just starting to see the meat of some of these provisions come into play.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Rob Massa, a managing director at Prime Capital Financial, said plan sponsors have found that some provisions are relatively easy to implement within the current plan infrastructure. He points to the higher catch-up contributions for participants aged 60 through 63, which are mandatory for plans that already allow catch-ups, as an example.

That provision, along with the increase in the age at which required minimum distributions must be taken, have a near-immediate, positive impact on affected employees, says Mike Webb, a senior manager in the retirement plan consulting group at CAPTRUST. When it comes to the age at which RMDs must be taken, which increased to age 73 in 2023 from age 72 and will go up to age 75 in 2033, there are benefits to employers as well.

“The [fewer] RMDs they have to deal with the better,” Webb says. “Seniors never understand them, and it’s just a difficult, cumbersome rule all around.”

Focus on Withdrawals

Another popular provision among plan sponsors is self-certification of hardship withdrawals, which some sponsors like because it both reduces their liability and allows them to respect the privacy of employees facing adversity.

Many plan sponsors have made other changes to their withdrawal provisions, taking advantage of SECURE 2.0 provisions that allow for withdrawals related to natural disasters and emergency expenses and for distributions for domestic abuse survivors. Such provisions were all among the optional provisions that plan sponsors told Fidelity they were most likely to adopt in a survey last year.

“A lot of those are the distribution options that are allowing participants, in times of need, to access retirement funds, when pre-SECURE 2.0, those wouldn’t have been opportunities,” says Molly Beer, the defined contribution consulting practice leader at Gallagher.

That said, it is too early to say whether plan participants are taking advantage of such provisions or whether having those options available is motivating participants to increase the amount they are saving in workplace retirement plans. In addition, some plans are hesitant to enact provisions that could potentially increase plan leakage.

“I’ve been on calls talking about the [emergency withdrawal provisions], and they’re like, ‘Why would we give people more access to their retirement funds?’” says Julia Zuckerman, a vice president and senior consultant with the Segal Group. “We want to encourage them to keep the money in there.”

Slower Uptake for More Complicated Provisions

When it comes to more complicated optional provisions, such as in-plan emergency savings accounts and employer matching of student loan repayments, however, uptake among plan sponsors has occurred more slowly.

“To add those, plan sponsors need more clarification on how it will actually work and the potential risks if they’re not administered correctly,” Beer says.

Only 1% of employers have adopted a Roth sidecar savings account for employees, and just 5% have put the student loan matching provision in place, according to Alight’s “2025 Hot Topics in Retirement and Wellbeing” report. The lower adoption makes sense, Webb says, as many plan sponsors focus their efforts on keeping up with new, mandatory rules before moving onto the optional provisions.

Still, more than 40% of plan sponsors said they were at least moderately likely to implement the student loan matching provision in their plan going forward, according to Alight. Experts say interest in that option depends heavily on the demographics of employers.

“I have had one client that was super excited about that provision, because they have a highly educated workforce with a lot of junior people and a ton of debt,” Zuckerman says. “That was very attractive for them, and it has been a well-utilized program in its first year.”

Pharmacy chain Walgreens in 2024 announced that it would offer the student loan repayment matching contribution benefit to the more than 276,000 participants in its 401(k) plan, starting this year.

Sparking Conversation

Even employers that have opted not to implement the SECURE 2.0 optional provisions are having in-depth discussions about concepts like student loan repayment and emergency savings, with some deciding that out-of-plan solutions are best for their populations. The fact that such dialogues are happening more frequently is a win for the industry, Massa says.

Looking ahead, experts expect plan sponsors to start working through some more complicated provisions, such as the requirement that highly compensated employees make their catch-up contributions into Roth accounts, starting in 2026, that will require a coordinated effort between plan sponsors and their providers.

“A number of plans still don’t allow or currently have Roth provisions in place in their retirement plan,” Rayll says. “That’s especially true in some of our markets, including the government space, and some of them may be limited by state laws that don’t currently allow them to do Roth contributions.”

Among some plan sponsors, there is also a sense of uncertainty and anticipation that there may be more changes to the law, especially with a new administration in place.

“We already had the mandatory Roth delayed, and you never know, with those provisions that are further down the line, whether Congress will decide to further delay or even repeal them,” Webb says.

More on this topic:

SECURE 2.0: What’s Effective This Year and What Plan Sponsors Need for 2026
Where Does SECURE 2.0 Implementation Stand for 2025?
PLANSPONSOR Roadmap Series: Catch-Up Provisions
Chavez-DeRemer Shows Support for Union Pension Assistance Law in Confirmation Hearing
PLANSPONSOR Roadmap Series: Student Loan Matching and Educational Benefits

Employees Show Increased Confidence in DC Plans, but Still Face Financial Anxiety

According to multiple research reports, workers have increased their retirement confidence and their focus on building emergency savings, but routine financial stressors still persist.

While employees are increasingly confident about their ability to save enough money to support themselves in retirement, and more workers are building up their emergency savings, many are still anxious about their day-to-day finances and continue to feel the effects of elevated cost of living, according to several recent research reports.

After surveying 1,000 full-time employees in August 2024, Betterment at Work found that the most-reported financial stressor that employees faced in the previous 12 months was the increasing cost of living, followed by credit card debt and housing costs.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

On the flip side, the survey found that 63% of respondents reported having an emergency fund—a jump from 52% in 2023. This included 82% of those reported being “very/somewhat financially stable,” as compared with 25% of those with “moderate/significant financial instability,” showing a correlation between feeling financially stable and having emergency savings, according to Betterment at Work.

But even though the majority of respondents reported having emergency funds, a shockingly high 54% said they use their retirement account for emergency expenses. Of those who have tapped into their retirement accounts for emergencies, 34% said they did so within the past year to pay for short-term expenses, such as rent, groceries and medical bills.

Mindy Yu, director of investing at Betterment at Work, said in the report that the findings indicated participants’ lack of awareness of the consequences of early retirement account withdrawals.

Under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, employers can allow participants to cash out up to $1,000 from a 401(k) or IRA for emergency withdrawals without the participant paying a penalty.

Betterment at Work found that Millennials were the most likely age cohort to have tapped into their emergency fund in the preceding 12 months. Those with student debt were almost twice as likely as those without student debt to have tapped their emergency fund.

The Importance of DC Plans

When it comes to retirement savings, 55% of respondents said they want a higher 401(k) match than what their employer currently offers, and 18% said they want a 401(k) match on student loan payments. Despite this, 72% of respondents feel at least somewhat confident that they will be able to save enough to support themselves in retirement, up from 68% who felt the same in 2023.

The Investment Company Institute found in its report “American Views on Defined Contribution Plan Saving, 2024” that defined contribution account owners appreciate the saving and investing features of DC plans. For example, nearly nine out of 10 DC plan-owning individuals agreed that the plans helped them think about the long term and made it easier to save. Additionally, nearly half of individuals with a DC plan said they probably would not be saving for retirement if not for their DC plans.

A significant majority (85%) also agreed that the tax treatment of their retirement plans was a big incentive to their contributing, and many disagreed with proposals to remove or reduce tax incentives for retirement savings.

“It’s important when discussing changes to our retirement system for policymakers to note that current plans are working for millions of Americans,” said Sarah Holden, the ICI’s senior director of retirement and investor research, in a statement. “Most Americans, whether they currently have retirement accounts or not, have confidence in DC plans as they are and do not support any changes.”

The results come as Congress is in discussions to extend the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a major priority for President Donald Trump. There are ongoing conversations in Washington, D.C, about where federal revenue to offset tax cut extensions could come from, and most tax-free or tax-favored programs are facing consideration.

How Can Retirement Income Options Gain Acceptance?

Beyond the tax question, a recent report from Greenwald Research found that participating in a DC plan alone will not be enough to allow workers to retire comfortably, and a majority of workers participating in employer-sponsored plans (86%) said they want their employers to offer in-plan retirement income options.

Slightly more than half of plan participants surveyed by Greenwald said they feel employers have a high level of responsibility for helping employees generate income or develop a withdrawal strategy in retirement. Meanwhile, plan sponsors are still concerned about the complexities of offering such strategies, the fees associated with them and the reputation of annuities and guaranteed lifetime income.

Only one-quarter of plan sponsors said they currently have at least one retirement income option in place, while another 30% said they are seriously considering implementing such options. Both plan sponsors and participants in the survey expressed the need for more education on retirement income options, as well as tools that help determine when participants should start receiving retirement income.

“I would be concerned about communicating [retirement income options] and rolling them out,” one plan sponsor cited in the Greenwald report said. “Making sure that participants are aware of the options and understand them is easier said than done.”

«