Provider Ordered to Return Millions to Health Plans

MagnaCare has been ordered to return at least 14.5 million to ERISA-covered health benefit plans.

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and a third-party administrator that provides employee health benefit plans with access to a network of doctors, hospitals and other medical providers have reached an agreement in which the administrator has committed to improve its communications with health plans and to return certain fees.

According to the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), the plans paid fees for claims administration that the department alleged were not fully disclosed to the plans.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The agreement with MagnaCare LLC resolves alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and was negotiated in 2016. While the firm maintains the charges against it are unfounded, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has now approved the agreement.

Under the agreement, MagnaCare will return at least $14.5 million in network management fees to ERISA health benefit plans, “with possible additional payments of $4.5 million based upon business volume through 2019.”

“The Long Island-based company has also agreed to implement revisions to its disclosures to employee health plans and participants to provide greater transparency on fees and claims procedures,” EBSA reports. “It will also offer to adjudicate certain claims where participants may not have clearly understood the requirements for submitting documentation.”

Jonathan Kay, New York regional director for the EBSA, says the case serves as a reminder that a fiduciary must fully disclose fees to plan clients under federal law. “Benefit plans must receive accurate fee disclosures so that they can make informed decisions when selecting service providers,” he adds.

Background information provided by EBSA suggests the company did not fully disclose its network management fees and provided incomplete year-end summaries of its fees to certain plan clients. By doing so, they prevented these clients from filing accurate federal Form 5500 financial reports with the government, EBSA charged. The department also alleged that the administrator’s claims processing procedure “did not give plan participants and medical providers an opportunity to submit enough information for MagnaCare to determine whether hospital emergency room claims satisfied the prudent layperson standard.”

The prudent layperson standard requires certain plans to pay emergency claims if plan participants reasonably believe their condition requires immediate medical attention. Contemporaneously with the complaint, the department and MagnaCare filed a consent order resolving these allegations and memorializing their agreement.

In a statement to PLANSPONSOR, MagnaCare lays out its position on the matter: “We made a strategic decision to work collaboratively with the Department of Labor in order to come to an agreement to provide additional transparency to our customers, despite our position that the department’s claims were unfounded. This constructive approach enables us to move forward as the industry leader in fee transparency, and focus on continuing MagnaCare’s long tradition of providing our clients outstanding service, along with benefit plan administration and provider networks that offer access to high-quality health care services at competitive prices.” 

Additional details are in the complaint and consent order.

Plan Sponsors Looking to Enhance Fixed Income Strategies

In order to preserve capital and protect participants from longevity risk, plan sponsors intend to put a bigger emphasis on fixed-income strategies.

Even though several plan sponsors are concerned about helping participants preserve capital especially as they near retirement, a study by T. Rowe Price show many can use improvement when it comes to executing fixed-income strategies.

The firm finds that fixed income on average receives only 18% of the allocation of time that plan sponsors spend on their plans. That figure is even lower for capital preservation (13%). When asked to name their top three concerns for fixed income investing, 93% named rising interest rates at the top followed by low yields (69%), and inflation (56%).

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Today, most sponsors offer stable value (80%) and core bond strategies (85%), but few offer global income strategies. Less than half (44%) offer a TIPS strategy or some other type of inflation-hedging strategy. Furthermore, 22% include global bond strategies or other inflation-hedging options, and only 4% offer unconstrained and/or absolute return strategies.

However, T. Rowe Price finds that plan sponsors are looking at the next 12 months as a period of change characterized by a widening focus on fixed income strategies. Fifteen percent intend to implement a multi-strategy/white label fixed income offering, 11% look to offer inflation-linked bonds or Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS), and 9% are eying unconstrained and/or absolute return fixed income offerings.

And while fixed income strategies can help any participant by offering diversification and protecting against market losses, it is especially important for older participants nearing or in retirement. According to T. Rowe Price, this population of the workforce is quickly expanding, raising the concern that many participants may be facing longevity risk.

Almost half (44%) of respondents to this T. Rowe Price survey reported a shift toward an older participant base compared to 10 years ago. A separate study of the plans that T. Rowe Price services as recordkeeper found that in the past decade, the percentage of participants at least 50 years old rose from 34% to 38%.

“The role of fixed income in defined contribution plans is becoming more complex because of shifting participant demographics, market and interest rate uncertainties, and the limitations of core bond strategies,” says Lorie Latham, senior defined contribution strategist. “The U.S. and global bond markets have developed over the past two decades to the point where they now offer investors many attractive opportunities to enhance portfolio diversification, improve returns while maintaining an eye on risk. While some of these levers have been underutilized in defined contribution plans, it appears that plan sponsors are growing more receptive to them, based on their stated intentions over the next 12 months. This could help plan sponsors address the longevity and inflation risks their participants face.”

«