Putnam Launches Health Cost Estimator

March 4, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Putnam Investments is helping 401(k) participants gauge how much income they will need for health care costs in retirement.

The Putnam Health Cost Estimator provides 401(k) plan participants with a personalized estimate of what portion of their expected future monthly income will be needed to cover health care costs in retirement. The estimator includes itemized insight about medical, dental and pharmaceutical expenses, at different age points.

The projections are generated from individual participant data and cost models using proprietary, actuarial-based guidelines and expressed as monthly costs, providing participants with a digestible format that lays the groundwork for action steps to address potential savings shortfalls.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“Context is critical, but simplicity is also very, very important,” Stephen Jenks, head of DC product and marketing, Putnam Investments, told PLANSPONSOR.

The Health Cost Estimator is the next generation of the Lifetime Income Analysis Tool, rolled out by Putnam in 2010 (see “Putnam Introduces Retirement Income Calculator”). The Analysis Tool is designed to help 401(k) participants project how much income their current retirement savings may generate in retirement compared with what they may need, and offer actionable steps.

The health care enhancement provides:  

  • An estimation of personalized health care costs, including insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses, that reflect preexisting health conditions and future retirement location (by state). The Health Cost Estimator can personalize health care cost estimates by allowing users to input various health states including being a tobacco smoker, or having high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol, cardiovascular disease and cancer, Jenks explained.
  • Actionable methods to help close possible savings gaps, including increasing contribution rate, postponing retirement, and/or changing investment mix; and,
  • Projected health care cost for year-one of retirement, but also the percentage of income that may go to health care in that year, as well as guidance on health care costs at different ages during retirement.

The Health Cost Estimator was tested in a pilot program with 30 plans and Putnam found that, of the participants using it, 90% made a savings increase—average deferral rates moved from 8% to double digits, Jenks said.

The health care enhancement is valuable to both the participant and the plan sponsor, explained Ed Murphy, head of defined contribution, Putnam Investments. Plan sponsors are concerned that one in four employees say they will have to continue working after age 65 because of finances. This creates extra insurance costs for companies—double the cost of insuring employees ages 45 to 50, Murphy said.

With the Lifetime Income Analysis Tool, coupled with the Health Cost Estimator enhancement, the hope is that employees will engage with it early and save enough to retire. But just offering a retirement income tool to employees is not enough: They must also be prompted to use it.

Murphy suggests engaging employees during open enrollment meetings. Putnam, for example, distributes iPads at its meetings and walks employees through the Lifetime Income Analysis Tool. “If you can introduce them to the Web in the beginning, then I think you’re in a good position to get them to come back,” Murphy said.

In addition, when participants log into their accounts, the Lifetime Income Analysis Tool, with the Health Cost Estimator, is displayed on the home page. Participants have a short attention span, Jenks said, so retirement income tools must be front and center.

In the future, Jenks said Putnam would like to add long-term care information to its Health Cost Estimator.

Report Shows Decline in Employer Health Coverage

March 1, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A U.S. Census Bureau’s report, “Employment-Based Health Insurance: 2010,” shows the rate of employer-based health plan coverage dropped from 64.4% in 1997 to 56.5% in 2010.

According to the report, among employed individuals, the percentage covered by employer plans dropped from 76.0% in 1997 to 70.2% in 2010. Those not in the work force—people without jobs not currently looking for work—saw a change of 45.4% to 38.6%. For unemployed individuals—people without jobs actively seeking employment —the rate fell from 33.5% to 30.8%.

Hubert Janicki, an economist with the Census Bureau’s Health and Disability Statistics Branch, clarified how individuals who are not employed could be covered by employment-based health insurance, saying: “Unemployed and individuals not in the labor force with employment-based coverage were generally covered by a previous employer’s plan or someone else’s, such as a spouse’s or a parent’s employer.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The study found that family income was a strong predictor of working for an employer that offers any health insurance benefits: Individuals with family income less than 138% of the federal poverty level were the least likely (43.3%) to work for an employer that offered health insurance benefits, and those with family income 401% and above of the federal poverty level were the most likely (80.9%) to work for an employer that offered health benefits. The federal poverty level for a family of four was $22,113 in 2010.

The report cited several reasons for nonparticipation in an employer’s health insurance plan. Half (50.4%) of nonparticipating workers whose employer offered health insurance benefits declined coverage by choice. While two-thirds of these (66.4%) declined coverage because they were receiving health care insurance from another source, more than one-quarter (27.4%) opted out due to cost. Roughly one-third of nonparticipating employees—37.1% in 1997 and 32.2% in 2010—claimed they were “ineligible” for an employer-sponsored plan, typically because they had not completed their probationary period or they were temporary or part-time workers.

Other highlights of the report include:

  • In 2010, 71.1% of employed individuals ages 15 and older worked for an employer that offered health insurance benefits to any of its employees.
  • Less than half (42.9%) of individuals who did not complete high school worked for an employer that offered health insurance to any of its employees, compared with more than three-quarters (78.9%) of individuals with a college degree.
  • 75.7% of workers ages 45 to 64 worked for an employer that offered health insurance benefits, compared with 60.0% of workers 19 to 25.
  • Among married couples with only one member employed in a firm that offered health insurance benefits, 68.7% of married couples provided coverage for the spouse.
  • While 37.6% of firms with fewer than 25 employees offered more than one health insurance plan, 65.6% of firms with 1,000 or more employees offered more than one plan.

The report uses data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.

Sara Kelly

«