Report Rebukes N.Y. Retirement Funds’ Continued Investments in Hedge Funds

A report from Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria T. Vullo says actions of the New York State Comptroller are in contrast to other state pension managers which have reduced or eliminated similar investments.

New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) Superintendent Maria T. Vullo released a report saying the New York State Common Retirement Fund (CRF), the investment arm of the New York State and Local Employees’ Retirement System and the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System, for years has invested pension system funds in high-cost, underperforming hedge funds and nontransparent private equity funds. 

The concerns highlighted in the DFS report are in contrast to actions taken by state pensions nationwide, which have widely cut or eliminated similar investments.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The report alleges that the New York State Comptroller has over-relied on active management by outside hedge fund managers, who consistently have underperformed low-cost diversified index investments while charging “huge” fees. “Over the last fiscal year alone, the CRF has paid more than $150 million in fees to hedge fund managers for managing $8 billion in assets, or approximately 4.5% of the fair value assets of the System. In comparison, CRF paid $59.2 million in fees and commissions for the substantially greater $61.5 billion invested in domestic equities, 34.5% of the fair value assets of the System, representing less than one-tenth of the 1% fee on assets under management,” the report says.

In addition, the report alleges that CRF has paid out $1 billion in fees to hedge fund managers over the last eight years, while these assets have under-performed, costing the system $3.8 billion in excess fees and underperformance. It notes that hedge funds are the worst of the six asset allocation classes with a 10-year record.

The report accuses the State Comptroller of continuing to put money into hedge fund investments despite years of poor performance―increasing by 86% the system assets put into hedge funds by 2016.

NEXT: Private equity transparency issues

According to the DFS report, in each of the past eight years, the System has paid excess fees of at least $40 million (in 2009 and 2010) and at least $100 million in every year since (including $240 million in 2014) in an apparent effort to boost returns―returns, the report says, that could have been easily achieved through broad index funds.

Vullo accuses the Comptroller’s Office of not putting into place adequate controls to address transparency issues with the system’s investments in private equity, where the managing general partners may be imposing hidden costs and expenses that would otherwise have been credited against fees already owed, and paid, by the limited partner investors, she says. 

The report notes that although private equity as an asset class has reported above average returns over the past decade, management’s control and discretion over the valuation of privately-held assets―for which there often are no independent market-set values―leaves open the real possibility that when the investments are redeemed, some portion of the excess profits will vanish as market prices replace mark-to-model theoretical prices.

Based on its findings, DFS is considering certain regulatory reforms for the hedge fund investments, as well as reforms proposed in the report to address the lack of transparency of the private equity investments. DFS will examine these issues in upcoming examinations, and will release reports as necessary to serve the public interest.

In addition to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)―the nation’s largest public retirement system―eliminating its hedge fund investments in 2014, last month, California Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 2833, sponsored by State Treasurer John Chiang, requiring public pension funds to disclose fees paid to private equity investment firms.

CDHPs Offer Less Savings Than a Year Ago

Enrollment in consumer-driven health plans still continues to rise, however, according to United Benefit Advisors.

Among employer-sponsored health insurance plans, consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs) continue to increase in popularity even though they are offering less savings than a year ago, according to the 2016 Health Plan Survey from United Benefit Advisors (UBA).

UBA finds 26.4% of all U.S. employees are now enrolled in CDHP plans, an increase of 21.7% from last year and nearly 70% from five years ago.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

However, CDHP plan costs have risen 2% from last year, according to UBA. So while they are still 3.5% less costly than the average plan, they offered more savings in 2015 when they were 5.6% less costly than the average plan.

UBA says trends in the West are worth watching. CDHPs have increased in prevalence in all regions except the West, which saw the number of these plans decrease by 7.2% from 2015. Despite this decrease in the number of CDHPs offered in the West, there was an 18.9% increase in the number of employees enrolled, indicating the continued attraction to the lower premiums of such plans.

But, while most of the country is experiencing slightly increased premiums, California has enjoyed an 11.4% decrease in average single premiums. Employers in this part of the country are actually moving away from CDHPs and toward HMOs, which the survey shows are 9% less costly than the average plan.

“Cost-saving strategies, like cost shifting, should be taken with a grain of salt, given the increased burdens they place on employees,” says Les McPhearson, CEO of UBA. “Given the higher than average out-of-pocket costs of CDHPs, this turbulence in the West (who typically leads the nation in health care trends) indicates that employers and employees are still determining the value and success of these plans, making it a cautious upward trend to watch.”

UBA’s 2016 Health Plan Survey Executive Summary is available now at http://bit.ly/UBAsurveyor. It can be downloaded directly at http://bit.ly/2016-executive-summary.

The 2016 UBA Health Plan Survey contains the validated responses of 19,557 health plans and 11,524 employers, who cumulatively employ more than two and a half million employees and insure more than five million total lives. The focus of the UBA survey is to report results that are applicable to the small and mid-size companies that represent the overwhelming majority of the nation’s employers, while also including a mix of large companies in rough proportion to their actual prevalence, nationally.

«