Retirement Account Balances Dipped 20% in 2022, Trading Lowest in 20 Years

Despite economic challenges, plan participants were resilient saving for retirement, Vanguard Group data shows.  

Economic and market challenges may have coalesced for workers in 2022, but retirement plan participants were persistent saving for retirement and trading in their accounts was at the lowest levels in 20 years, new Vanguard Group data finds. Vanguard defined trading, or exchanges, as moving account assets from one plan investment option to another.

Although inflation spiked to 40-year highs and equity and bond markets sagged—effecting historic drawdowns for retirement-plan account balances—workers’ retirement-plan behaviors were largely unaffected, the data showed.

“While there were signs of financial stress, overall, participants’ behavior in retirement plans remained in line with previous years, and most continued to maintain a long-term view,” Vanguard stated in previewing the firm’s upcoming How America Saves 2023 report.

Data for How America Saves is sourced from 5 million defined contribution retirement plan participants in 1,700 Vanguard recordkept plans. As of December 31, 2022, Vanguard’s defined contribution recordkeeping business had $552 billion in assets under management.

Workers were able to continue contributing to their retirement accounts, data showed:

  • 2% reduced payroll deferrals to 0;
  • 9% decreased retirement contributions;
  • 15% increased retirement contributions;
  • 24% increased retirement deferral from an annual automatic increase; and
  • 50% made no change.

“These behaviors are very much in line with previous years,” Vanguard stated.

Generally, workers remained fairly consistent in their approach last year: 6% of nonadvised participants traded or exchanged assets from their retirement accounts, compared to 8% in 2021 and 15% in 2002, according to the Vanguard data.

“Participants who are pure target-date fund investors benefit not only from continuous rebalancing during volatile markets but are also far less likely to trade when compared with all other investors,” the data preview stated. “Through 2022, only 2% of all pure TDF investors made an exchange, a rate five times lower than all other investors.”

A pure TDF investor is a participant whose entire portfolio is invested in a single TDF.

“We attribute the reduced trading to the increase in pure TDF investors, as only 2% of them traded,” a Vanguard spokesperson said in an email.

With equity and bond markets down in 2022, the average participant account balance decreased by 20% from year-end 2021, data showed. Vanguard also found the average participant account balance was $112,572 at year-end 2022, and the median account balance was $27,376, a 23% decline from the end of 2021.

Vanguard credited workers’ resilience to employers’ increased adoption of automatic enrollment over the last two decades and the prevalence for participants’ allocations to TDFs, which are increasingly used for employers’ qualified default investment alternative.

Among plans that used automatic enrollment, 59% defaulted employees into the plan at a rate of 4% or higher, and nearly 70% of plans automatically enrolled employees into an auto-escalation feature that increased their deferral percentage annually.

As of year-end 2022, 58% of Vanguard plans had adopted automatic enrollment, up from 56% in 2021 and compared to 32% in 2012, the earliest year for which Vanguard provided data, according to the preview. Larger plans of 1,000 or more participants were more likely to implement automatic enrollment, with 76% of plans with at least 1,000 participants using the feature, Vanguard found.

“From both a savings and investment perspective, using thoughtful plan designs and automatic solutions has improved participant outcomes,” Vanguard stated.

The entire Vanguard retirement research report, How America Saves 2023, will be published in June, the firm said.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Partisan Divide Continues to Sharpen on ESG Investing

EBSA head Lisa Gomez spoke in defense of a DOL rule that would permit ESG in retirement plans as Republicans push back against ESG in Congress and the courts.

The Department of Labor’s assistant secretary of labor for employee benefits security, Lisa Gomez, defended the DOL’s final rule allowing the consideration of ESG factors in retirement plan investments at a webinar hosted Monday by Ceres, a sustainability advocate.

The rule, which took effect on January 30, permits, but does not require, the use of ESG considerations in investment selection by retirement plan fiduciaries. There is a pending lawsuit in Texas challenging the legality of the rule.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Gomez explained that this rule is “not a per se requirement” to use ESG and clarifies that ESG factors may be considered as part of a fiduciary’s ordinary risk-return analysis. She also explained that this new rule does not allow fiduciaries to sacrifice the financial health of a plan to pursue other goals: A fiduciary may consider the risks and opportunities of climate change and other ESG factors.

Gomez dubbed the rule “a return to neutrality.”

According to Gomez, the previous rule, passed during the administration of President Donald Trump, which required only “pecuniary factors” to be used in investment selection, had a “chilling effect” on the consideration of ESG factors. Gomez said the word “pecuniary” neither appears in the text of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the governing statute for both rules, nor does it occupy a “long-standing place in employee benefits law.”

Gomez briefly discussed one of the more nebulous provisions of the new rule when she said participant preferences for investments can be considered in menu selection on the grounds that it can increase plan participation and deferral rates, thereby increasing retirement security. She did not comment on how fiduciaries should determine adequate participant interest or how much economic gain could be compromised in exchange for increased participation, if any.

Eric Pitt, a climate finance consultant at Ceres who moderated the webinar, asked Gomez how a fiduciary should consider a hypothetical ESG large-cap stock fund for a plan menu: Should the fiduciary compare it to other similar ESG funds or the entire universe of large-cap funds? Gomez answered that there is no special treatment for ESG funds, and a fiduciary should look generally at the risk and return for any and all large-cap equity funds available, whether they use ESG considerations or not.

Despite the branding of the rule as neutral, Republicans in Congress have increased their organized opposition to the use of ESG considerations in retirement-plan investing.

Congressman Patrick McHenry, R-North Carolina, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, announced the creation of a “Republican ESG working group” on Friday. The purpose of the working group is to “combat the threat to our capital markets posed by those on the far-left pushing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) proposals.”

The working group will be chaired by Congressman Bill Huizenga, R-Michigan, and is staffed entirely by Republicans.

Last month, Congressmen Juan Vargas, D-California, and Sean Casten, D-Illinois, started the Sustainable Investment Caucus.

Casten said in a statement that, “Given the significant growth of assets under management in funds that prioritize ESG factors, Congress has a duty to craft policies that provide investor protections and transparency of information to market participants.”

Members of the Sustainable Investment Caucus are all from the Democratic Party.

«