Retirement Accounts Up Despite Inflation, Volatility

Fidelity data shows that 74% of workers globally cite cost of living and inflation as sources of stress.

Retirement account balances were up in Q4 and participants continued to defer into retirement plans despite higher costs due to inflation and market uncertainty, according to Fidelity Investments’ data released Thursday.

The average 401(k) account balance increased to $103,900 in Q4, up 7% from Q3 2022. It was, however, well below the average balance of $135,600 in Q4 2021, before the market declines of last year.

The average 403(b) account balance increased to $92,683, up 6% from last quarter, according to Fidelity, though below the $115,100 average of Q4 2021.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The total savings rate for the fourth quarter, which reflects a combination of employer and employee 401(k) contributions, was 13.7%, holding steady from 13.8% in Q3 2022 and 13.9% in Q2 2022. While pre-retirement Boomers saved at the highest levels (16.5%), Gen Z savers were fairly consistent at 10.2% (versus 10.3% last quarter), according to the data.

Fidelity’s Q4 analysis examined savings behaviors and account balances for 43.4 million 401(k), 403(b) and IRA, accounts.

The data also shows that Generation Z is taking saving for retirement  into its own hands, according to the latest data from 10s of millions of retirement plan participants in Fidelity Investments accounts.

Fidelity’s Q4 analysis of savings behaviors and account balances for 43.4 million 401(k), 403(b) and IRA, accounts shows that the average balance for Gen Z savers (born 1997-2012), who as a group are who are heavily invested in target date funds, increased 23% quarter-to-quarter, the highest of any other group.

In addition, Fidelity saw from Gen Z a 71% increase in IRA accounts opened mostly via workplace paycheck deferral as compared to Q4 2021. That growth figure is large as it is in part from a small base, but it’s also a new environment in terms of financial awareness and accessible technology, says Rita Assaf, vice president of retirement and college products for Fidelity.

“Just because they are eligible and interested does not mean they have to open up a Roth IRA,” Assaf says. “Interest by younger groups [in IRA savings] has been happening for the last couple of years because of the environment; this crowd, or segments of it have had access to workplace plans at much younger ages than other generations, and there has been a lot done by workplaces to provide education and overall financial wellness awareness.”

Young and Wild (About Finance)

Assaf says the proliferation of financial advice and discussion on social media is also likely contributing to Gen Z getting out of the gates strong with saving habits.

“You’re seeing so much more on social media of discussions of financial topics,” she says. “They are saying ‘I’m more interested in my financial well-being.’”

In the past, setting up an IRA meant walking into a branch and working with someone, Assaf points out. Now, IRAs can be started over a phone-based app in a matter of minutes. Fidelity has leaned into this technology with a no-fee brokerage account for teens that it opened in 2021, as well as Fidelity Bloom, an app that allows users to keep separate accounts for spending and saving.

The competition is growing, however, with app-based IRAs drawing the attention of Silicon Valley. Robinhood Financial, which made its name for stock trading during the pandemic, announced an online IRA with a 1% match in December. A venture-backed startup, Lilly Funds, came out in November with an app-based IRA that rewards savers with cash back and shopping rewards, and just this week new app-based 401(k) Arnie is offering users issue-based investing options that can put money toward—or avoid—certain companies or sectors.

New Lawsuit Calls ESG Unlawful “Investing Fad”

A second court must now determine if ESG can be lawfully considered in retirement fiduciary decisionmaking.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative nonprofit law firm, brought a lawsuit Tuesday in the District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin challenging the Department of Labor’s recently enacted rule permitting the use of environmental, social and governance investment strategy in retirement plans. The complaint alleges that the rule “unlawfully politicizes the retirement system.”

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are two defined contribution plan participants in Wisconsin: Richard Braun, an operations manager for SWAT Environmental, and Frederick Luehrs III, a maintenance supervisor at Petron Corporation.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Like a similar lawsuit brought against the DOL in January, this one alleges that ESG is a “non-pecuniary” factor which prioritizes political considerations over risk and return, at the expense of retirees’ finances and to the benefit of political causes.

Different from the first lawsuit filed against DOL on this issue, verbiage indicating general disregard for ESG appears throughout the complaint. ESG is dismissed as an “investing fad” and said to be designed to promote “left-leaning political causes.” In a statement regarding this lawsuit from Kate Spitz, one of the WILL attorneys representing the plaintiffs, Spitz said “By injecting highly partisan issues—like climate change and racial justice—into investment strategy, the Biden Administration is jeopardizing the retirement income of over 140 million Americans.”

This complaint also emphasizes the removal of documenting requirements. A previous DOL rule from 2020 under President Donald Trump’s administration said that non-pecuniary factors could only be considered as a tiebreaker between two investments if those investments were otherwise indistinguishable and if the plan documented why pecuniary factors were insufficient. The new rule allows non-pecuniary factors to be used if two investments would both equally serve the interests of the plan—seen by investment managers and ERISA attorneys as a lower bar—and has no documentary requirement.

The plaintiffs allege that dropping this documentary requirement allows plans to justify politically-informed investing choices using hindsight if they ever face litigation, rather than rely on their documented reasoning at the time the decision was made. This would have the effect of making it harder for participants to sue sponsors who use ESG considerations in investment selection, they argue, because there would be no paper trail documenting the plan’s decisionmaking, allowing for post hoc justifications.

The complaint ultimately requests that the court temporarily suspend the rule and then permanently enjoin the DOL from enforcing it and promulgating similar ones in the future.

WILL also signed on to a coalition letter earlier this month. The letter likewise dismisses ESG as a political agenda masquerading as an investment strategy. The letter states: “Rather than prioritize the financial well-being and stability of retirees, ESG seeks to advance ideological goals related to environmental policy and other divisive subjects.”

Among other signatories, the letter was signed by members of the fossil fuel industry—including four state coal alliances—and a number of nonprofits financed in part by the Koch brothers, including the Leadership Institute and Americans for Prosperity.

«