Retirement Investors Should Take a Look at International Equities

“For investors with long-term time horizons, international equity markets offer diversification and present a meaningful opportunity," says Nigel Bliss, with Mondrian Investment Partners.

During this period of heightened market volatility, active asset managers are marketing international and global equity strategies to institutional investors based on valuations and the value they could add to their portfolios, particularly in emerging markets and small-cap equities, says Alexi Maravel, director of institutional research for Cerulli Associates.

“With the volatility in the markets, there is a feeling that a lot of institutions have had a lot of exposure to U.S. equities for a long time and have benefited from that, just on a valuation basis,” Maravel says. “But international and emerging markets are undervalued relative to U.S. equity markets, so a lot of the institutional investors we talk to are reassessing their U.S. allocations.” Retirement plan investors should do the same, he says.

A survey that Cerulli sent to asset managers last month asked them where they expect to receive requests for proposals (RFPs) in the next 12 months. “The top strategy they expect to receive RFPs for is multi asset class solutions,” Maravel says. “The fifth highest was international and global equities. We are seeing a subtle shift of institutional investors moving their assets.”

Nigel Bliss, senior portfolio manager with Mondrian Investment Partners agrees that international investing is taking hold: “For investors with long-term time horizons, international equity markets offer diversification and present a meaningful opportunity, given the near decade-long outperformance of U.S. equities over international and the material overvaluation of the U.S. dollar relative to most market developed market currencies.”

Susan Czochara, practice lead, retirement solutions, at Northern Trust Asset Management, says her firm views “international investing in the context of retirement investors as a strategic move. We want to keep that long-term strategic focus broadly diversified in investments, including international. Risk and risk control are essential in down markets. Our research shows that a strategic portfolio that includes international will, over time, have a better risk-adjusted return. We think of it more from a strategic standpoint, especially as it relates to retirement investors.”

As to whether investors should seek out actively managed or passively managed international investments, Maravel says institutional investors are seeking out passive investors when the risk/return is low, that is “where it is easy to do passive replications. As you get further out on the risk spectrum into emerging or frontier markets, or small cap, you see less passive and the search for best-of-breed active managers.”

Northern Trust Asset Management views the active/passive debate slightly differently. “Our belief is that the debate around passive versus active presents a false dilemma,” Czochara says. “The best features of both can be found in factor-based investing. It is rules based and transparent, both of which you would find in a typical passive style, plus it offers a potential increase in returns over the index. That is what we believe is a great approach to use for both non-U.S. and U.S. exposure. As a pioneer in factor-based investing for nearly 30 years, we have seen how it provides excess returns.”

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Pairing ESOPs With 401(k)s Can Heighten Retirement Outcomes

Trevor Bare, with Conrad Siegel, discusses the differences between ESOPs and 401(k) plans and how offering both can better prepare employees for retirement.

As medical and technological advances continue to improve health outcomes, average life expectancy continues to rise. According to the Society of Actuaries (SOA)[1], for a couple currently in their 30s retiring in average health at age 65, there’s a 25% chance that at least one spouse will live to be 100—spending almost as many years in retirement as in the workforce.

Meanwhile, more defined benefit (DB) plans are being terminated as defined contribution (DC) plans take their place. Plan sponsors are seeking other ways—in addition to the traditional 401(k)—to meet growing retirement needs and set their employees up for success after years of valued service and loyalty.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

One option companies turn to is the employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). Most companies already offer a 401(k) plan, and except for small companies—those with less than 20 employees—an ESOP can serve as a strong complement.

As you weigh the options for your company, here are a few points to consider about how the ESOP and 401(k) plan can work together to produce better retirement outcomes.

Not your average retirement plan

Though ESOPs and 401(k)s are both qualified retirement plans, there are a few key differences. While a 401(k) is strictly a retirement savings vehicle, an ESOP is dual-purpose: It provides an avenue for retirement savings and serves as a business succession plan.

With an ESOP, you offer much more than compensation or an employer match—you offer a stake in the company. Employees invest primarily in company stock for shared ownership of the business. This fosters greater buy-in from them, driving business success and generating more revenue to fund both the ESOP and 401(k) plan.

To decide if an ESOP will work for your business, ask yourself: Who do you want to lead the company when the current leadership retires? Are you open to treating all employees like owners?

The importance of diversity

From a retirement planning perspective, there are two key differences between a 401(k) and an ESOP: where the accounts are invested and how they’re funded. With a 401(k) plan, the participant typically has investment choice, but, with an ESOP, the participant is primarily invested in company stock.

It’s important for participants to consider all of their assets, including company stock, when electing how to invest in their 401(k). Because the ESOP is primarily centered around company stock, a diversified approach to your 401(k) investments is key to withstanding market volatility and risk.

Once employees are 55 and have 10 years of service, they can diversify a portion of their investment outside of the ESOP—up to 25% for the first five years, and up to 50% in the sixth and final year. Many plan sponsors will also provide the option for participants to roll over the diversified ESOP funds into their 401(k) plan at age 55.

Evaluate your employee education: Do your employees understand their investment options? Do you have a resource to answer participant questions and provide ongoing plan education?

A delicate balance

ESOPs are funded through employer contributions, while 401(k)s are largely funded through employee contributions. When an ESOP is introduced, it’s common for the plan sponsor to decrease its 401(k) match in order to fund the ESOP. Without a strong match incentive, participant contributions may plateau or even decline. To encourage participants to continue to grow their 401(k) contributions, plan sponsors should consider other features such as automatic enrollment and automatic escalation, as well as ongoing employee education and gap analysis. Developing easy-access points for participants to join and increase contributions can help facilitate greater plan participation.

Consider: Are your employees saving enough for retirement? How will you need to adjust your 401(k) match to fund the ESOP? What are other ways you can encourage and facilitate more 401(k) participant contributions?

A little more conversation

For many participants, a 401(k) plan seems complicated enough without the added layer of another retirement plan. If you’re considering an ESOP, work with your adviser to streamline the communication process so that participants can view the two plans as a complete retirement package. Having a centralized communication hub will allow participants to accurately track their retirement goals, consider all assets and investments, and identify next steps to reach their goals.

A streamlined communication approach is not only critical for participants but for the recordkeeping side, as well. Having one recordkeeper for both plans is ideal, as it can save you time and prevent confusion. If this isn’t an option, make every effort to ensure both companies are in regular communication with one another and have a clear understanding of their roles.

Reflect: What is your current communication plan? How would you integrate the ESOP into your communication plan? Is working with the same recordkeeper for both plans an option?

An ESOP isn’t for everyone.  A company’s approach to compensation and benefits is a defining factor in its success. Take time to reflect on your vision for your business, explore your options, know the risks, and learn how different plans work together, to determine the most strategic approach.

 

Trevor S. Bare, a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries (FSA), is a consulting actuary at Conrad Siegel and specializes in retirement plan consulting and administrative services for defined contribution and defined benefit plans. Conrad Siegel is a mid-Atlantic employee benefits and investment advisory firm with offices in Harrisburg and Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal or tax advice and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice. Any opinions of the author do not necessarily reflect the stance of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) Inc. or its affiliates.

[1] “Actuaries Longevity Illustrator,” Society of Actuaries, www.longevityillustrator.org.

«