Retirement Plan Appreciation Remains High

However, survey data shows there are some areas where employers could improve their communication strategies to optimize plan utilization and understanding.

TIAA released its 2022 Retirement Insights Survey last week, and among the findings are clear signs that employers need to remain focused on the fundamentals of quality retirement plan communications. 

While they say important gains have been made, employers remain concerned about employees not knowing enough about financial topics and not making the most of their company’s retirement plans. TIAA’s data shows 56% of employers cited this worry in 2020, and the number has since increased to 61%.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Relatedly, the TIAA research shows only 44% of employees are currently receiving financial advice. Of this group, the majority—or 31% of the total respondent population—found an adviser on their own, compared with the 13% of the respondent population that were linked to their current adviser by their employer.

Those employees who are more likely to say they have manageable debt levels are overrepresented among participants who say they work with an adviser, own annuities and feel they understand their employer’s retirement plan well. According to TIAA, those who understand their plan well are also more likely to say retirement savings are a current goal.

When it comes to the lingering impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the TIAA data shows some clear effects. A nearly two-thirds majority say the pandemic has either significantly or marginally increased their overall level of stress. At the same time, 56% of employees surveyed say they now appreciate their company’s health insurance benefits either significantly or marginally more than they did prior to the pandemic’s onset. On the other hand, only 48% say the same about their employer’s retirement plan.

According to the survey, knowledge among both employers and employees regarding the requirements and opportunities stemming from the passage of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act in late 2019 has decreased over the past two years. In the latest survey, 38% of the total survey respondents say they are extremely or very knowledgeable about the SECURE Act, which is down from 50% in 2020. Fewer say they are extremely or very familiar with the legislation’s lifetime income disclosure requirements, and the same is true when it comes to the law’s provisions requiring greater portability of in-plan annuity products.

Much of the survey data speaks to the evolving levels of interest voiced by employers and employees about in-plan guaranteed lifetime income products. Among employees not interested in an in-plan GLI annuity, cost is the top reason cited. According to TIAA, employers recognize this dynamic, and they often see products’ complexity as a major challenge preventing broader adoption of GLI solutions. Generally speaking, employees see such products as being more pricey, more confusing and more restrictive than employers do—perceptions that highlight the opportunity for targeted education and communication efforts. TIAA says employers will need to emphasize the lower costs of these options in-plan versus outside of their plan to appeal to employees.

Employers can also consider including more targeted and nuanced information alongside mandatory income projections. According to the survey, almost two-thirds of employers think income disclosure will increase employees’ GLI interest. Case in point: over seven in 10 employees have received a retirement income projection and say it is helpful.

Millennials Will Make Impact Investing Mainstream

As younger investors attain more wealth, doing good will matter as much as making a profit, says Fidelity Charitable.

Impact investing will likely become a mainstream investment strategy as millennials attain more wealth, according to a Fidelity Charitable study that found that 61% of millennial investors already practice impact investing, compared with only one-third of all investors.

 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“We find that investors are increasingly interested in aligning their investments with their broader values and desire for social change,” Scott Nance, vice president of impact investing at Fidelity Charitable, said in a statement. “And the trend toward values-based investing will only grow as millennials come to control a larger share of wealth.” 

 

Although impact investing typically differs from traditional investing in that it prioritizes achieving social good over financial returns, the study treats ESG investing as a subset of impact investing.

 

The study found that while millennials are in the lead when it comes to impact investing, older generations are starting to catch on. Only one-third of all investors engage in impact investing, but 40% of non-participating investors said they will consider making their first impact investment within a year, while 60% said they aren’t likely to consider it.

 

The study observed that the main barrier keeping many investors on the sideline is a lack of knowledge, rather than disagreement over the concept of impact investing. It found that 39% said they weren’t participating because they didn’t know enough about impact investing, while 14% said investment decisions should be based only on returns, and another 14% said they didn’t believe impact investing was an effective way to solve problems.

 

“As investors gain more experience and options continue to become more accessible, many investors plan to increase their impact allocation,” says the report. “A significant portion of those who haven’t yet made an impact investment say they are likely to consider doing so in the next 12 months—further reinforcing that the strategy is gradually becoming more mainstream among everyday investors.”

 

Among investors of all ages who currently participate in impact investing, the most common method was through mutual funds or indexes made up of companies screened for certain established criteria, which was cited by 45% of respondents. The next most common way, which was named by 43% of respondents, is avoiding investments in individual companies or industries they feel have a negative impact.  Other methods include investing in private funds that focus on companies with social or environmental benefits (36%); investing in small businesses or start-ups that focus on social or environmental benefits (36%); participating in peer-to-peer financing or microloans (20%); and providing loans to charitable organizations (20%).

 

“Younger generations bring a new mindset to their everyday decisions—seeking to align their choices with their values, including financial and investment decisions,” says the report. “As these investors continue to grow their wealth, impact investing could quickly shift from an emerging trend to a mainstream practice.”

 

«