Rising Employer Health Care Costs May Boost Self-Insured Plans

A new WTW survey shows that half of employers are concerned about the increasing costs of providing group health plan coverage for retirees 

Increasing health care costs are driving U.S. employers to search for alternative methods to provide health care benefits to retirees, new research shows. The WTW Retirement Medical survey found 50% of employers are concerned about rising costs and are targeting private insurance marketplaces to substitute for group plans.  

WTW survey data shows 22% of employers have either stopped offering workers a traditional group medical plan to early retirees or are considering a replacement. Among employers that have terminated a group plan, 75% are replacing it with access to and financial support for individual insurance through a private marketplace plan, according to the report.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“Employers are rightfully concerned about this growing burden and are studying all options, including private marketplaces,” says Lindsay Hunter, senior director for Health & Benefits at WTW, in a press release. “For now, they remain committed to offering retiree healthcare benefits and a positive retiree experience. But they’re looking for ways to provide them more cost effectively.”

WTW finds that some employers offering traditional group plans to pre-Medicare-eligible retirees will explore whether individual insurance could effectively replace group plans.

The survey shows 12% considering replacing the group plan, 7% have stopped offering the group plan and 3% have decided to end the group plan and implement insurance through a private marketplace in the future. Nearly three quarters (74%) of employer respondents have no action planned at this point, while 5% are considering retaining the group plan and offering access to individual insurance through a private marketplace.

The survey also finds many employers have altered their organization’s health care strategy after ceasing to offer a group plan to pre-Medicare-eligible retirees.

Data shows that 13% of employers plan to terminate all access and financial support, 75% to replace the group plan with access to and financial support toward individual insurance through a private marketplace and 4% to replace the group plan with access to individual insurance with no financial support.

WTW data also shows that 43% of employers agree if their health care costs escalate, it might impact the business’ ability to improve other benefits. Among respondents, 32% say it will put pressure on the balance sheet, 29% pressure on the firm’s profit and loss statement, 22% change their ability to manage cash flow, and 2% said it would restrict the business’s ability to hire.

Additionally, 13% of employers plan to change their retiree medical benefits within three years, as 49% will make a change because benefits are too expensive for the company to maintain, the report finds.

With individual self-insured plans—purchased through a private marketplace— employers accept the financial risk of providing health care benefits to retirees and supplement the cost. Employers with a fully insured group health plan buy health insurance for their retirees on the commercial market.  

Since the passage of the Affordable Care Act, however, self-insured plans have not spiked.

Trevis Parson, chief actuary for the individual marketplace at WTW, explains that self-insured plans are likely to grow in popularity because of legislation that was passed by Congress and signed by President Biden.  

“The recent passage of the Inflation Reduction Act is making private insurance marketplaces for individual coverage an even more attractive option for retiree benefits,” he says. “[T]he extension of premium tax credits and the improvements to [Medicare] Part D plans position private marketplaces to better offset rising health care costs for both organizations and their retirees.”

The survey was conducted by WTW in July and August, with 122 U.S. employers participating. Respondents employ 1.9 million workers.

How Important Are Proper Termination Dates for Retirement Plan Compliance?

Experts from Groom Law Group and CAPTRUST answer questions concerning retirement plan administration and regulations.

“We are a large, complex health care system that sponsors a 403(b) plan for all the 501(c)(3) members of our controlled group, of which there are many. We have some issues with recording the proper dates of termination of employment for retirement plan purposes. One problem is that the process of reporting termination dates is a manual one, and some of our managers are simply more efficient at it than others. In addition, since it is not a payroll item, termination dates are not fed to our recordkeeper each payroll as part of our remittance feeds, but instead as a separate, less-frequent feed from our HRIS system. Finally, we have a lot of rehires, as well as employees who transfer between employer in our controlled group. This has resulted in our recordkeeper failing to capture some termination dates.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

 

We know we need to fix this, but how important are proper termination dates for retirement plan compliance purposes? As I’m sure the Experts can understand, there are a lot of competing benefits projects here, so I want to prioritize this project accordingly.”

Kimberly Boberg, Taylor Costanzo, David Levine and David Powell, with Groom Law Group, and Michael A. Webb, senior financial adviser at CAPTRUST, answer:

You are certainly asking the correct question here, as there are varying levels of importance of retirement plan elements. For example, if you were having great difficulty tracking down lifetime employee contributions for 15-year catch-up purposes, the Experts might suggest not tracking that down and eliminating the 15-year catch-up election as an alternative.

But dates of employment are far from a minor element of a retirement plan; in fact, they are absolutely critical to retirement plan compliance. Termination of employment date is a key date for so many retirement plan provisions, such as small balance cashouts, eligibility for distributions, break in service rules for eligibility and vesting, required minimum distributions, post-employment 403(b) employer contributions, etc. Plan sponsors who don’t ensure that termination of employment dates are 100% accurate run the risk of disqualification or significant sanction upon audit.

Thus, the termination of employment date issue should be a high priority, and you should work with your IT department and your recordkeeper to ensure 100% accuracy. If that is not possible, you may wish to consider hiring a Third-Party Administrator, or TPA, to address termination date accuracy.

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice. 

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Amy.Resnick@issgovernance.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future column.

«