Risk International Offers to Share Fiduciary Responsibility for Health and Welfare Benefits

"Our services have always met a fiduciary standard in principle and have enabled us to drive significant year-over-year savings for our clients, with an average savings of $1,650 per employee in 2018," says Eric Krieg, president of Risk International’s Employee Benefits Advisory division.

Risk International’s Employee Benefits Advisory division (RIBA) will provide what it says is the first-of-its-kind fiduciary advisory service, an evolution of the division’s conflict-free advisory services that have driven millions of dollars in benefits and health care cost savings for clients over the past five years.

Through its fiduciary role, RIBA provides expert guidance that is in complete alignment with its clients’ best interests. Although fiduciary advisers can be found in the retirement plan arena, Risk International says this is the first time a fiduciary service is being made available to optimize and protect employee benefits plans.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

According to the company, a critical element of an employer’s fiduciary responsibility is its ability to avoid conflicts of interest and demonstrate diligence that plan costs (with ever-increasing employee cost sharing) are being well managed. In today’s benefits and health care economy, this responsibility is increasingly difficult for employers to meet because procuring and managing health and welfare benefits doesn’t follow standard supply chain practices. Without a fiduciary adviser, employers are unable to access impartial expert guidance and representation.

“Our services have always met a fiduciary standard in principle and have enabled us to drive significant year-over-year savings for our clients, with an average savings of $1,650 per employee in 2018,” says Eric Krieg, president of RIBA. “By taking on a formal co-fiduciary role, we now provide the highest duty of care by law in our client advising and advocacy, setting a standard that is unreachable by industry stakeholders with inherent conflicts of interest. As the industry exposes employers to more and more fiduciary risk, we empower our clients to fully exercise their rights. This changes the game in favor of our clients’ and their employees’ interests, compelling the deepest disclosure and accountability from all service providers. It puts our clients in the driver’s seat, gets them to a better place faster, and gives them the control to stay there. Quite simply, we see an emerging risk management issue, and we won’t let our clients be exposed or compromised.”

According to Krieg, RIBA is able to achieve better results than the traditional benefits scheme thanks to this co-fiduciary representation combined with its BEST Platform (Benefits Excellence System and Tools), which is a performance management process that departs from dependence on the broker/carrier product-driven cycle.

For more information about how RIBA’s services help employers cut costs and reduce risk without cost-shifting to employees or reducing benefits, contact RIBA@riskinternational.com or call (216) 255-3400.

403(b) Plans Improving Governance Practices

Even among 403(b) plans not governed by ERISA, PLANSPONSOR DC Survey results show improvement in certain governance practices.

Responses to the PLANSPONSOR Defined Contribution (DC) Survey over the past three years indicate that 403(b) plan sponsors are improving certain plan governance practices.

For Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)-governed 403(b) plans, the percentage using the services of a plan adviser or institutional investment consultant jumped from 59.2% in 2016 to 71.8% in 2017 and 73.3% in 2018. In 2016, 32% of 403(b) plan sponsors indicated their adviser acted as a 3(21) fiduciary investment consultant, and 16% reported their adviser acted as a 3(38) fiduciary investment manager to the plan. This compares to 45% and 14.4%, respectively, in 2017, and 47.9% and 16.6%, respectively, in 2018.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Overall, in 2016, more than three-fourths (76.6%) of ERISA 403(b) plans said they had an investment committee for their plan. The percentage grew to 86.1% in 2017 and 87.9% in 2018. In addition, the make-up of ERISA 403(b) plans’ investment committees has changed. In 2016, one-third of plan sponsors reported their investment committees included only internal employees, 4.6% said their committee including only people external to the company, and 39.1% indicated their committee included a mix of internal and external people. By 2018, this was 40.2%, 3.8% and 43.1%, respectively.

Nearly 73% of ERISA 403(b) plans reported having an investment policy statement (IPS) in 2016, about the same as in 2017. However, in 2018, nearly 80% of ERISA 403(b) plan sponsors said they had an IPS. From 2017 to 2018, the percentage of plan sponsors indicating their IPS covered target-date funds (TDFs) and their underlying funds grew from 59.6% to 62.2%.

In addition, the survey found that in 2017, 47.7% of ERISA 403(b) plan sponsors agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, “Our organization appropriately documents the reasoning behind changes to plan investments,” while in 2018, the percentage who agreed or strongly agreed with that statement jumped to 77.6%.

Non-ERISA 403(b)s

Even among 403(b) plans not governed by ERISA, PLANSPONSOR DC Survey results show improvement in certain governance practices.

In 2016, 54.3% of non-ERISA 403(b) plan sponsors reported they have an investment committee for their plans. This jumped to 67.3% in 2017 and 67% in 2018.

Half of non-ERISA plans indicated they had an investment policy statement in 2016, compared to around 60% in 2017 and 2018. From 2017 to 2018, the percentage of plan sponsors indicating their IPS covered target-date funds (TDFs) and their underlying funds grew from 54% to 66.2%.

In addition, in 2017, 48.2% of non-ERISA 403(b) plan sponsors agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, “Our organization appropriately documents the reasoning behind changes to plan investments,” while in 2018, the percentage who agreed or strongly agreed with that statement jumped to 65.5%.

“Although some variation in results is to be expected in different years, our data suggests that 403(b) plan sponsors are improving plan governance,” says Brian O’Keefe, director of research and surveys at Strategic Insight, parent of PLANSPONSOR and PLANADVISER. “It is encouraging to see a wider range of plans, including both ERISA and non-ERISA plans, formalizing investment oversight policies and practices.”

«