Schwab Retirement Plan Services Releases Online Financial Guide

The interactive tool comes after an annual survey of 401(k) participants found workers want more help saving and planning for retirement.

Schwab Retirement Plan Services has launched an online dashboard designed to help retirement plan participants save and invest.

My Financial Guide walks participants through a financial health assessment using straightforward questions most workers can answer without having to look at their financial records, according to Schwab.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“My Financial Guide was developed through extensive research and user testing to give workers the power to take control of their financial situations on their own terms,” says Nathan Voris, director, Schwab Retirement Plan Services. “We know workers want help with their finances, but many are confused by industry jargon and find it difficult to start the planning process. This interactive experience was designed to help meet their expressed needs and complement other educational resources and tools we provide to employers that want to offer competitive benefits and help employees save and invest for the future.”

Schwab Retirement Plans Services’ annual survey of 401(k) participants found that workers want more help saving and planning for retirement. Six in 10 participants (61%) in the 2021 survey said they think their financial situation warrants professional advice, an increase from 50% in 2020. The firm says My Financial Guide responds to these needs with modules on topics that retirement plan participants frequently want help addressing, including emergency savings, debt, insurance and estate planning. Each topic can be accessed independently so employees can work on the financial areas they care about most, at their own pace.

“My Financial Guide covers critical areas that employees say they want help with from their workplace, delivered through a modern, intuitive user experience that reflects our commitment to digital innovation that drives engagement,” Voris continues.

Working with experts in Schwab Digital Services’ Innovation Lab, teams conducted user testing to see financial challenges through the eyes of participants. Three insights emerged from this process, one being that workers’ financial lives change over time, so the support they receive should, too. Experts also found that many workers feel they are not worthy of a financial plan, which they view as difficult to make; and workers prefer support on their own terms, meaning where, when and how it best fits their goals and lifestyle.

My Financial Guide prompts users to provide information such as marital status and household income that drives customized visuals, next steps and goal setting.

Behavioral economics drives much of the guide’s interactivity. The Emergency Savings module, for example, encourages participants to act by drawing on goal gradient theory, which shows that motivation increases as individuals believe they are closer to achieving a goal. Participants see their emergency savings goal mapped out with a percentage progress bar, monthly savings amount and the next six-month milestone. They can use sliders to shorten the time frame further to see monthly goals and progress. Even if long-term progress is small, Schwab Retirement Plan Services says being on the verge of a short-term success may help keep participants motivated.

At the end of each module, participants receive a personalized checklist of next steps based on their inputs and can check on their guide periodically to track progress against goals and update their information in response to any major changes. My Financial Guide also includes options for participants to obtain financial coaching and get connected with tools, additional guidance and resources beyond their workplace plan to help address broader financial goals.

In addition, clients of Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. who have brokerage accounts can receive a complimentary financial plan for needs beyond their workplace plan.

Court Revives Part of NYU ERISA Suit

An appellate court found the district court erred in dismissing claims related to the use of higher-cost share classes and in denying the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint to add more defendants.

Three years after a federal district court judge ruled for New York University (NYU) in a lawsuit alleging imprudence in the management of two of the school’s 403(b) plans, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has revived a claim in the case.

The appellate court agreed with the plaintiffs that the district court erred in dismissing claims regarding the use of retail share classes rather than cheaper share classes for funds in the plan. It also agreed with the plaintiffs that the district court improperly denied their motion to amend the complaint to include individual retirement plan committee members as defendants in the suit.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

In its decision, the 2nd Circuit noted that a claim for breach of the duty of prudence under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) will “survive a motion to dismiss if the court, based on circumstantial factual allegations, may reasonably infer from what is alleged that the process was flawed” or “that an adequate investigation would have revealed to a reasonable fiduciary that the investment at issue was improvident.” The appellate court found that was the situation in this case.

“The complaint sets forth cost differentials of specified basis points for the dozens of mutual funds as to each of which, they claim, NYU should have offered lower-cost institutional shares instead of higher-cost retail shares,” the court’s decision says. “Plaintiffs allege that this information was included in fund prospectuses and would have been available to inquiring fiduciaries when the fiduciaries decided to offer the funds in the plans. In sum, plaintiffs have alleged ‘that a superior alternative investment was readily apparent such that an adequate investigation’—simply reviewing the prospectus of the fund under consideration—‘would have uncovered that alternative.’”

The appellate court noted that on review of a motion to dismiss, it must draw reasonable inferences from the complaint in the plaintiffs’ favor. And, as it did so with respect to the share-class allegations, it found that the plaintiffs have “sufficiently alleged that NYU acted imprudently in offering the number of retail-class shares identified in the complaint.”

As for the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint to add more defendants, the 2nd Circuit said the district court denied the motion to amend with reference to the wrong legal standard. It vacated the denial of leave to amend and remanded the case back to the district court for consideration under the correct legal standard.

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.