SCOOTER Store ESOP Participants Claim Fiduciary Breach by CEO

October 11, 2007 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - The chief executive of SCOOTER Store, Inc. had insider information about the federal government's investigation into the mobility device company, but continued to use employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) assets to purchase company stock when it was imprudent, according to a recent participant suit.

The plaintiffs argue an “inherent and potentially disabling” conflict of interest occurred because Douglas Harrison held dual positions as the President and CEO and primary shareholder of the company and as the trustee of the company’s ESOP. The suit argues that Harrison could have sidestepped his conflict by resigning as trustee of the plan.

According to the 49-page complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Harrison, as trustee of The SCOOTER Store Employee Stock Ownership Plan, knew the company was the target of congressional oversight and criminal investigations when he continued investing plan assets in company shares.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The SCOOTER Store, which manufactures power wheelchairs, hit some trouble in 2003 when Congress began an investigation of power mobility equipment. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services later reviewed whether and under what circumstances the federal government would fund the equipment to Medicare beneficiaries and at what price. The Justice Department also conducted a company investigation, the suit said.

The suit says the federal government was the company’s primary customer – representing more than 80% of revenues from 2003 to 2005.

As a result of these investigations, the company stock in the plan plummeted from $211 a share in 2002 to $16.34 in 2003 – which participants claim had catastrophic effects on the value of their accounts. Named plaintiff Carol L. Oren-Bosquet’s account, for example, dropped from $17,407.73 to $3,777.90.

Plaintiffs claim that instead of stepping down from his role as the trustee of the plan, Harrison used his insider information to favor interests of the company at the expense of the participants. Among a number of fiduciary breach claims is that Harrison caused the plan to purchase company stock at grossly-inflated prices that Harrison knew on the basis of material, non-public information to exceed fair market value.

According to the complaint Harrison had the plan purchase $4 million in additional company stock in December 2002 at the $211 price – at which point he knew about the government probes.

The claim also charges Harrison with breaching his fiduciary duty by allowing his father and other SCOOTER Store insiders to sell the company stock to the plan at inflated prices that Harrison knew were above market value.

LaSalle Bank N.A. as Harrison’s successor trustee is also accused in the suit of continuing to invest virtually all plan assets in company stock over the three-year period during which plan accounts were virtually wiped out.

Court: No Need to Question 14,000+ 401(k) Class Action Participants

October 10, 2007 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Efforts by a health care products manufacturer to get details from more than 14,000 401(k) participants on their outside investments as part of an ongoing class action fiduciary breach lawsuit have been blocked by a federal judge.

The ruling by U.S. Magistrate Judge Nan R. Nolan of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois involves the October 2004 suit against theDeerfield , Illinois-based Baxter International, which claims the company violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by continuing to offer company stock as an investment option when plaintiffs alleged the shares were overvalued.

Nolan asserted in the latest ruling that Baxter had not proven its need to know the size and composition of investments outside the plan held by 14,511 participants, or the particular materials or advice participants relied on in deciding to invest in company shares.  

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

According to court documents, Baxter announced in July 2002 it had inflated its earlier earnings – a development prompting a sharp share price drop. The company announced in July 2004 it was restating several years’ worth of financial statements because of accounting problems with its Brazilian operations.

Named plaintiff David E. Rogers filed the suit against Baxter, the plan’s administrative and investment committees, and several corporate officers, alleging they presented the stock as an option when it was no longer prudent to do so.  

Rogers also charged that defendants misrepresented information about the company’s operations and that executives engaged in a scheme to artificially drive up the share price so they could benefit from more valuable stock options.

Nolan ruled that the answers to Baxter’s questions were not relevant to whether the company committed an ERISA fiduciary breach. Also, since Rogers’ claim of company misrepresentations was levied on behalf of the plan, Nolan said Baxter did not need to have the information it sought about each class member to prepare for trial.

In February 2006, the court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit, and in March 2006 the court granted Rogers’ motion to certify the case as a class action.

The latest ruling in Rogers v. Baxter International Inc.,N.D. Ill., No. 04 C 6476, 10/4/07, is  here .

«