SEC Finds Merrill Lynch Traders Overcharged for RMBS

The brokerage firm will pay more than $15 million in settlement.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced that Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith will pay more than $15 million to settle charges that its employees misled customers into overpaying for residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBSs). Merrill Lynch will repay customers more than $10.5 million and pay penalties of $5.2 million.

The charges say that Merrill Lynch traders and salespeople convinced customers to overpay for RMBSs by deceiving them about the price the firm paid to acquire the securities. Further, the SEC says, Merrill Lynch traders and salespeople illegally profited from excessive, undisclosed commissions. In some cases, the SEC says, these commissions were twice what customers should have paid. In addition, the SEC says, the firm’s traders and salespeople violated anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws in purchasing RMBSs.

Had Merrill Lynch had compliance and surveillance procedures in place, these egregious acts could have been prevented, the SEC says.

“In opaque RMBS markets, lying to customers about the acquisition price can deprive investors of important information,” says Daniel Michael, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Complex Financial Instruments Unit. “The commission found that Merrill Lynch failed in its obligation to supervise traders who allegedly used their access to market information to take advantage of the bank’s own customers.”

Divorce Negatively Impacts People’s Retirement Readiness

The Center for Retirement Research finds that the net worth of non-divorced households is 30% higher than for divorced households.

Divorce is very costly to individuals and, in most cases, reduces people’s retirement readiness, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. The center’s National Retirement Risk Index (NRRI) found that 53% of households that have gone through a divorce are at financial risk in retirement, compared with 48% of households that have not experienced a divorce.

Further, the net financial wealth of non-divorced households is $132,000, about 30% higher than the $101,000 held by divorced households. The center says that, overall, divorce raises the possibility of being at risk by 7 percentage points. For couples with a previously divorced spouse, the risk is raised by 9 percentage points.

For divorced single men, it is a 6-percentage-point increase, but for divorced single women, the impact is not statistically significant. The center says the reason why it may not be significant is because divorced single women are more likely to own a house, which they can use for a reverse mortgage.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Other costly effects of a divorce, the center says, include short-term legal fees. Divorce also frequently results in the sale of the house, which not only involves transaction costs but also can occur at a suboptimal time in the housing market.

Frequently, divorce requires that financial and retirement wealth be divided between two new households. If financial assets can be divided without being sold, divorce may not reduce total wealth. But if assets are sold, the timing may be bad and sales can involve transaction costs.

Divorce also increases daily living expenses because the divorced couple now occupy two households. They also lose the federal income tax break that married couples receive. In addition, divorced women often have children to look after, which can impede their ability to earn a living. And divorced men often are required to provide financial support to their ex-spouse while also paying the bills for a new family.

Finally, the line of credit for former spouses may be reduced, thereby reducing their access to mortgages.

«