Simple Ways to Reduce Employees’ Current and Future Health Cost Concerns

Taking advantage of preventive care, health savings accounts (HSAs) and employer-provided physical wellness programs are some of the ways employees can get a handle on health care costs now an for the future.

Survey data from the Nationwide Retirement Institute reveals 63% of younger adults believe their health today will impact how much they need to save for retirement, and 69% of older adults noted that one of their top fears in retirement is their health care costs going out of control.

Younger adults reported health care expenses have caused them to go into debt (38%), stop saving money for discretionary purchases (43%), made it harder to contribute as much as they would like to a 401(k) retirement account (31%) or caused them to file for bankruptcy (13%).

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Prioritizing preventative care, taking advantage of a health savings account (HSA), participating in employer physical wellness programs and working with a financial adviser are simple actions employees can take to help lessen the burden of health care costs before and in retirement, Nationwide notes.

Getting control of one’s health today can affect current health care expenses as well as ensure a healthier life in retirement. However, the survey found many younger adults have taken “risky” actions to save money on medical cost at the expense of their current health. These include delaying seeking medical help, taking less than the recommended dosage to extend the length of a prescription or stopping use of the prescription altogether, and not following a treatment plan recommended by a doctor. Nearly seven in 10 younger adults (69%) agreed that prioritizing self-care and mental health will help them save on health care expenses in the distant future and would like to do more to prioritize their health.

Taking advantage of preventative care is a way for adults to help ensure they are in good health. Only half of younger adults have had a physical or well-check and less than that (45%) have had preventive screening in the past year.

A different survey by Lively found many employees don’t understand health benefits—including that most insurance covers preventive care. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) features a provision that requires private insurance plans to cover recommended preventive services without any patient cost-sharing. Better education can lead employees to use benefits correctly and become healthier.

Lively found almost half of survey respondents only see a doctor if they are sick or something catastrophic happens (such as a broken bone). Lower-income adults tend to only go when something catastrophic happens. Ameeth Reddy, founder and CEO of Equal Health, based in Detroit, says case studies have shown that by encouraging employees to use primary care doctors, which encourage them to get preventive care, employers reduce their claims for other services. One case study of an Equal Health employer member shows surgeries and hospitalizations dropped by more than 70% and patient satisfaction was in the 54% range for a control group versus 94% for those with primary care.

The IRS has issued guidance allowing high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) with HSAs to cover specified medications and services used to treat chronic diseases prior to meeting the plan deductible.

Nationwide found that both younger and older adults lack understanding of the advantages an HSA can provide them from a tax perspective and as a retirement savings tool. Only 17% of younger adults use an HSA and of those who have one, 25% use it to pay only for current health care expenses (rather than saving those funds as a tax-free way to cover health care costs in retirement).

Only two in five older adults (42%) know that HSA contributions or funds drawn to pay for qualified expenses are not taxed. Among older employed adults who contribute to their HSA offered by their employer, more than half (52%) use it to pay for current health care expenses only.

More than half of respondents to the Plan Sponsor Council of America’s (PSCA)’s first-ever survey on HSA design and use, sponsored by Empower Retirement, educate employees about allocating assets between their 401(k)/403(b) plan and an HSA–but employee education remains the dominant concern of plan sponsors (indicated by 60% of respondents). During a session at the 2019 PSCA Annual Conference in May, Ken Forsythe, head of product strategy at Empower Retirement, told attendees that plan sponsors should use touchpoints, with suggested actions, to communicate to employees about HSAs throughout the year.

“If a plan sponsor offers an HSA-capable plan and are not somehow connecting HSAs with retirement for employees, they are missing an opportunity to help employees with retirement readiness,” Forsythe said.

In addition to taking advantage of preventive care and HSAs, employees can use physical wellness programs provided by their employers to improve their health and reduce health costs now and in the future. Nationwide found only 29% of younger adults said they have access to wellness programs from their employer. But, of those, only 17% participate in those programs.

Finally, if an employer offers access to a financial adviser to its employees for retirement planning, it should encourage employees to include discussions about health care expenses in their meetings with advisers. According to Nationwide’s survey, only one in three older adults plan on discussing health care costs during retirement (33%) or long-term care costs (32%) with a financial adviser or consultant.

Breaking down retirement health care costs between fixed and variable expenses can help ease the fears that employees have about the future.

Broad ERISA Lawsuit Targets Texas Grocery Chain

Plaintiffs suggest higher than average fees were not attributable to enhanced services for participants, but instead to defendants’ use of high-cost investment products and managers.

Plaintiffs have filed a new proposed class action Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division.

Their fiduciary breach suit is filed on behalf of the H-E-B Savings and Retirement Plan, naming as defendants some 20 John and Jane Does, along with the H.E. Butt Grocery Company and the retirement plan investment and administration committees.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The complaint contains an extensive amount of general information and statements about the defined contribution retirement plan industry, citing important precedent setting cases such as Tibble vs. Edison and Hughes Aircraft Co. vs. Jacobson.

According to the complaint, defendants failed to properly monitor and control the plan’s expenses, and allowed the plan to become one of the most expensive “jumbo” 401(k) plans in the country. Plaintiffs suggest the plan’s fees were, at a minimum, nearly three-times the average of peer plans, “and at least 50% higher than the 90th percentile.”

“And these fees were not attributable to enhanced services for participants, but instead defendants’ use of high-cost investment products and managers, and their continued retention of those managers even after performance results demonstrated that those high fees were not justified,” the complaint states.

Other allegations include that the defendants failed to prudently monitor the expenses charged within the plan’s index funds.

“These index funds charged fees that were up to seven-times higher than comparable alternative index funds that tracked the exact same indexes with the same level of effectiveness,” the complaint suggests. “Defendants also breached their fiduciary duties by utilizing an imprudent process to manage and monitor the plan’s target-risk funds, or ‘LifeStage funds,’ and by retaining those funds in the plan. Despite a marketplace replete with competitive target-risk fund offerings and experienced investment managers, defendants utilized an internal team to design and manage the LifeStage funds, with no previous experience managing investments for defined contribution plans.”

The complaint goes on to allege that defendants failed to prudently consider alternatives to the plan’s money market fund, “which offered only negligible returns that failed to keep pace with inflation.”

“The plan only included a money market fund, and did not offer a stable value fund as a capital preservation option, giving rise to an inference that defendants failed to prudently monitor the plan’s fixed investment option and investigate marketplace alternatives,” the complaint alleges.

Finally, the complaint alleges that defendants permitted inappropriate self-dealing and failed to properly investigate and negotiate a reasonable share of returns for the plan’s securities lending program.

“Based on this conduct and the other conduct alleged herein, plaintiffs assert claims against defendants for breach of their fiduciary duties of loyalty and prudence (Count One), engaging in prohibited transactions with a party-in-interest (Count Two), and engaging in prohibited transactions with a fiduciary (Count Three),” the complaint states. “In addition, plaintiffs assert a claim against H-E-B for failing to properly monitor the committee and its members to ensure that they complied with ERISA (Count Four).”

H.E. Butt Grocery Company has not yet responded to a request for comment.

The full text of the lawsuit is available here.

«