Small Plans Seeking Help of Advisers

Aaron Friedman, national practice leader, tax-exempt, at Principal in West Palm Beach, Florida, says “small and mid-sized plans are very much in need of advisers because they don’t have dedicated human resources personnel or expertise on plan administration."

Fifty-two percent of small retirement plans, those with less than $50 million in assets, that currently do not have an adviser are either looking for one or considering doing so, according to David Swallow, senior director of institutional relationships at TIAA in New York.

TIAA survey data also indicates that the top reasons why these small plan sponsors are looking for an adviser are to get help with the investment lineup, to provide participant education and to give guidance on fiduciary responsibilities, Swallow says.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The plan survey found that sponsors with an adviser feel more confident about meeting their fiduciary responsibilities (85% versus 80% of plans without an adviser), that their plan’s fees are fair and competitive (79% versus 57%) and that their employees are saving adequately (40% versus 8%).

On the flip side, Swallow says, a TIAA survey of retirement plan advisers found the areas that they thought they provided the most important support were participant enrollment; fiduciary and compliance support; and plan pricing, review and analysis.

Aaron Friedman, national practice leader, tax-exempt, at Principal in West Palm Beach, Florida, says “small and mid-sized plans are very much in need of advisers because they don’t have dedicated human resources personnel or expertise on plan administration. Lending them that expertise can expose them to best practices and current trends.”

For example, Friedman says, while fee levelization might not be the right fit for every plan, a recent survey by the Plan Sponsor Council of America of nonprofit plan sponsors found that 90% of large plans are familiar with fee levelization, but a mere 20% of small plans are. That same survey found that 40% of small plans use investments from a single provider “and have no vigorous process to monitor those investments. This is a particular need that advisers can address,” he says.

Advisers should be aware that many small plan sponsors do not think they are large enough to interest an adviser, he continues. “We know this is not true. There are many advisers who specialize in small plans, and they need to help sponsors overcome this misconception.”

“Whatever” Maintains Title of Most Annoying Word or Phrase

However, younger Marist poll respondents are less bothered by this word than older respondents.

For the ninth consecutive year, Americans say “whatever” is the most annoying word or phrase used in casual conversation, according to the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion.

 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

One-third (33%) of Americans consider “whatever” to be the most annoying word or phrase. The recent addition of “fake news” takes second place with 23% followed closely by “no offense, but” with 20%. Eleven percent think “literally” is the most grating word used in conversation, while 10% assert “you know what I mean” is the most agitating.  

 

Opinions differ based on age, the poll finds. Forty percent of U.S. residents ages 45 and older believe “whatever” is the most annoying spoken word, while 28% of Americans younger than 45 say “no offense, but” is the most bothersome. Among those younger than 45, 26% consider “whatever” to be the most grating word or phrase used in casual conversation.

 

By comparison, in 2016, “whatever” was considered most annoying by 38% of poll takers, and 20% chose “no offense, but.” “Ya know, right” and “I can’t even” each garnered 14%. Eight percent of Americans deemed “huge” to be the most irritating word or phrase spoken in casual conversation in 2016.
Reported by
Reprints
To place your order, please e-mail Reprints.

«