Some Rules Throw a Wrench in Rehire Administration

November 5, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Rehires can cause administrative headaches for plan sponsors and recordkeepers.

But there are a few simple guiding principles to know, according to S. Derrin Watson, Esq., an attorney who works for SunGard in Goleta, California, with their Relius line of educational programs and products. Watson shared five guiding principles for service and eligibility with attendees of the American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries 2013 Annual Conference: 

  • Years of service are forever; once you’ve earned them, they don’t stop counting. Warren reminded attendees that years of service can come from many sources, including the current plan sponsor, related employers, cosponsors of multiple employer plans and predecessor employers.
  • Everyone credited with service has an entry date. This is specified in the plan document and is generally the first entry date after or coincident with the date the individual satisfies the plan’s minimum age and service requirement.
  • An individual enters the plan on his or her entry date if the individual is an eligible employee on that date.
  • A person who becomes an eligible employee after his or her entry date enters the plan immediately.
  • Break-in-service rules can change these outcomes, but they are very limited.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Watson explained several scenarios. An employee who satisfies the age and service requirements for eligibility, and enters the plan on their entry date, but terminates and is rehired later, re-enters the plan immediately. The same is true for an employee who meets the requirements but terminates before their entry date and is rehired later. If an employee satisfies the plan’s service requirement, but hasn’t met the minimum age requirement, terminates and is rehired later, can enter immediately if they’ve met the minimum age requirement while not employed by the sponsor, or must wait for the next entry date following or coinciding with meeting the minimum age requirement. Finally, an employee who terminates before he or she meets the minimum service requirement and is rehired later, must wait to enter the plan on the entry date following satisfaction of the service requirement. 

Break-in-service rules can throw a glitch in rehire administration; they allow plan sponsors to disregard service in some situations. Watson explained three break-in-service rules:

  • Plan sponsors that require two years of service for eligibility to enter the plan, can require two years of service following rehire if an employee did not finish their two years of service prior to termination.
  • If a terminated employee incurs a one-year break-in-service, the plan sponsors can require them to complete a year of service upon rehire before entering the plan. However, the plan sponsor must use a retroactive entry date for that employee, meaning the employee must be able to retroactively contribute to the plan and get matching contributions. Watson said this rule is only helpful to plan sponsors if the employee comes back as a part-time employee and never gets another year of service in a plan year. “Otherwise it is an administrative headache,” he stated.
  • The rule of parity break-in-service rule allows a plan sponsor to treat a rehire as new for purposes of plan eligibility if he or she had the greater of five breaks-in-service or breaks-in-service equal to the years of service prior to termination. This also creates administrative headaches, because if the employee was paid and had part of his or her account forfeited, the employee can buy back the forfeiture if he or she repays the distribution, including deferral amounts. The money must be put back in the source account, but the plan sponsor and recordkeeper must keep up with the different tax basis for that amount.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) can also be an administrative headache for military personnel reemployed after their military service. One day of reemployment is all that is needed for retroactive retirement plan rights, Watson said. They are deemed to have had compensation during their time away; they must be given time to make deferrals for past years, and plan sponsors have to keep up with what money is for which year. They also get match on those deferrals for the respective year, but plan sponsors do not have to credit earnings or reinstate any forfeitures.

The Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act (HEART) adds another bump in administration. Watson explains that HEART provides for employers to pay military members away doing service the difference between their military pay and the pay they would receive if they were still working at their daily job. For retirement plan purposes, the plan sponsor must treat the employees receiving those payments as if they are still employed, and deferring, if they were before. Then, if a service member employee returns to employment, USERRA rules apply for counting full compensation for retroactive contribution purposes.

It is important to understand all the rules that affect rehire administration, because, as Watson said, some present “an opportunity to foul up.”

Preparing for Spending in Retirement

November 5, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Plan sponsors need to educate their participants about how to prepare for spending once they retire.

That was one of the conclusions reached by the authors of a new paper, “A More Dynamic Approach to Spending for Investors in Retirement,” from investment and retirement services provider Vanguard.

The paper, authored by Colleen Jaconetti, Francis M. Kinniry, Jr. and Michael A. DiJoseph, examines two common post-retirement spending strategies and recommends a third approach. The first strategy is termed as “dollar amount grown by inflation,” where the retiree chooses an amount of spending in the initial year of retirement and the amount is increased annually to account for inflation.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The second strategy is called “percentage of portfolio” and bases the retiree’s annual spending on a stated proportion of their portfolio’s value at the end of the prior year. The third approach, called “percentage of portfolio with ceiling and floor,” advocates relatively consistent post-retirement spending, while remaining responsive to the financial markets’ performance to help sustain a retiree’s portfolio.

The paper recommends flexibility as a prudent spending strategy. Periodically evaluating their income strategies, assessing their portfolios and considering whether alterations are needed can help people with their long-term financial planning.

Both retirement plan sponsors and plan advisers can assist people in carrying out strategies related to their post-retirement spending.

“One way that plan sponsors can help out participants is to talk to them about how much they can spend once they retire,” Jaconetti, senior investment analyst for Vanguard’s Investment Strategy Group, told PLANSPONSOR. “Help them to create a paycheck for life.” In addition to helping participants determine how much they can spend annually once they retire, plan sponsors can also help educate participants about how to set up a portfolio and the asset allocation of that portfolio.

“If participants can accept fluctuations in spending due to the changing performance of the markets, they can figure out how to adapt their spending, cutting back in certain areas, for example, if the markets don’t do well that year,” said Jaconetti. She added that by putting guardrails around annual post-retirement spending, in order to factor in the aforementioned fluctuations, participants will have a cushion that will hopefully maintain adequate retirement income over the long term.

There are several things for participants to consider when it comes to both preparing for retirement and then for post-retirement spending, said Jaconetti. Maintaining a broad diversification of investments is helpful, as is taking a realistic look at life expectancy and working. “While life expectancy is something that people can’t control, they can look into working longer, which give them time to save more and ultimately result in a higher amount that can be spent during retirement,” she said.

As for retirement plan advisers can do, Jaconetti said once a participant is retired, advisers can help them with the logistics of rolling over their retirement plan balance and actually setting up a post-plan portfolio from which they can draw retirement income.

“Advisers can work with the new retirees to establish spending rules and figure out a schedule for reviewing and updating their portfolio, perhaps every six months or a year,” said Jaconetti. One approach to consider, said Jaconetti, is creating a money market account for the retiree and directing his or her Social Security, required minimum distribution and portfolio gains there.

A copy of the paper can be found here.

«