Sponsors Appear Eager to Tackle Plan Problems

An annual study from Vanguard finds many retirement plan sponsors have embraced auto-features and a deeper sense of ownership over participant outcomes.

The 2015 edition of Vanguard’s “How America Saves” study shows plan sponsors continue to aggressively evolve and refine the defined contribution (DC) workplace savings model.

The study outlines increased use of automatic enrollment among the Vanguard client base. At year-end 2014, 36% of Vanguard plans had implemented auto-enrollment, a 50% increase since 2009. Today, approximately 60% of newly hired employees participating in Vanguard 401(k) plans were automatically enrolled.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“Moreover, although this feature was traditionally used only with newly hired employees, sponsors of half of Vanguard plans have now chosen to apply it to eligible nonparticipants,” the firm explains. “In addition, seven in 10 auto-enrollment plans have implemented automatic annual deferral-rate increases.”

Vanguard says these two approaches are leading to very meaningful jumps in retirement readiness for participants.

“The first step in retirement savings is participation,” says Jean Young, lead author of the report and a senior research analyst with the Vanguard Center for Retirement Research. “Over the past decade, we’ve seen a meaningful jump in total participation rates. Three-quarters of eligible workers now participate in their employer’s plan, up from two-thirds 10 years ago, underscoring the impact of autopilot plan designs.”

Another positive trend is a marked shift toward optimally designed portfolios for participants, Vanguard says—especially the use of automatic asset-allocation solutions based on a target retirement date or a targeted level of portfolio risk.

“The value of age- and risk-appropriate portfolio construction choices is most prominently reflected in the continued growth of target-date funds [TDFs], particularly as the default investment option,” Vanguard finds. “With 88% of plan sponsors offering target-date funds, nearly all Vanguard participants have access to this professionally managed and diversified investment choice, and 64% take advantage of this option. Last year, $4 of every $10 deposited in Vanguard plans was invested in target-date funds.”

According to Vanguard’s research, TDFs and other professionally managed allocations “have the added benefit of reducing extreme allocations and establishing appropriate risk levels for participants.” As of year-end 2014, roughly one in eight employees held an extreme allocation position. For example, 8% of participants held only equity investments, while 5% held no equity investments in their portfolios.

These numbers are still too high, Vanguard says, but 10 years ago, one in three participants held an extreme allocation position, so things are getting better. This is also true of extreme allocations to company stock, Vanguard notes.

“In addition to the broad adoption of diversified, balanced investment programs, there has been a dramatic shift away from company stock,” the study notes. “Only 8% of participants held a concentrated stock position at the end of 2014 [employer stock or otherwise], compared with 18% a decade prior—more than a 50% improvement.”

Additional findings from the research can be explored here.

Public Policy, Individual Action

TIAA-CREF’s president and CEO on how to stop the retirement crisis before it starts. 

Can public policy and the private sector come together to build a better retirement for American workers?

As part of the CEO Speaker Series from the Council on Foreign Relations, Roger W. Ferguson Jr., President and CEO of TIAA-CREF, responded to questions about the adequacy of the retirement system today. For one thing, within the next 20 years, the Trustees expect that Social Security will be unable to cover roughly 25% of expected payouts.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“The good news is most economists would share a consensus about how to fix Social Security,” Ferguson said. The bad news: “Our politicians are having trouble reaching that consensus.”

Understandably, he added, most Americans are concerned they will not have sufficient savings to cover their needs in retirement. “Private savings have been too low for too long,” he said, and though it is a longer-term problem, the solution is easier said than done. “We, as individuals, have to fix what we can.” Workers of all ages need to save more, and those who are able should prepare themselves for a longer career than they might have anticipated.

For physical laborers, that may not be possible. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid were designed to help keep the aging population above the poverty line. The primary goal of the retirement industry, he argued, should be to shore up those programs, to protect American workers from falling below the line as they age. “This is about long-term, intergenerational risk management.” That answer may be unsatisfactory to some, he said, but we, as an industry, need to focus on fixing what we can.

There are retirement systems in place that Ferguson believes are a good fit for American workers. A strong model is one that uses automatic enrollment to get people into the plan, that couples employee deferrals with an employer match, and that accumulates savings for both a fixed and a variable annuity. The first guarantees income for life, and the second can provide an inflation hedge.

NEXT: Are there enough incentives and policies in place to encourage savings?

 

The benefit of being able to save tax-deferred is good, Ferguson said. As to whether it is enough, he believes that success comes down to a combination of public policy and private action. Many people are not deferring much income to their savings, even with the incentives already in place.

The current economic climate makes it unlikely that further policies will be put in place to push private savings, he noted. “I suspect, over time, we aren’t going to get more in the way of incentives to save. It’s up to all of us to leverage fully what we have.”

While he argued there is no optimal relationship between the government and private sector, the appropriate balance is cyclical, and depends upon market fluctuations. “Economics tells us that governments do and should rise when there’s a ‘pure public good’ kind of problem,” and this holds true whether the issue is defense or Social Security. One way to think about it, he suggested, is that the government can set the rules for how transactions among external factors should take place.

Though it is controversial, he admitted, “We need, often, a big government back-stop when things really get out of kilter.” The level of government regulation in place may rise with market instability, but should also be expected to fall as conditions return to normal.

Globally, he said, “there are pockets of strength.” Australia’s superannuation system, for example, requires that everyone save a certain amount and that they save in a way that allows them to have annuities.

NEXT: Changing retirement plans. 

The nature of retirement planning products themselves should also evolve, Ferguson said. Financial literacy is too low to ask participants to make decisions that are in their own best interests, and many people need advice and guidance when it comes to retirement planning. Auto-enrollment and -escalation can address some of that, but the misconception that many participants have that their target-date fund (TDF) provides guaranteed income in retirement also needs correction. Even participants who are very happy in their 401(k)—and many employees do appreciate the employer-sponsored benefit, he said—regret that there is not more support for decumulation.

“We all have an interest in making sure that compensation systems are structures with the right set of incentives,” he said. “The real secret is that long-term investors and management have an alignment of interests around getting really smart strategies well-executed over a reasonable period of time.” For plan sponsors, having a goal for the plan in place can lead to a better-informed strategy and benefit plan overall. The benchmarks for plan success are unique to each program, but the plan design should provide a roadmap for meeting those targets.

The focus of many plans is on the savings process and accumulating assets, not the payout that should come at retirement. The second question—What will your account balance look like when it comes time to draw it down?—is largely ignored by the products currently available. “Think of retirement as a shared responsibility between employer and employee.”

Ferguson suggested that a successful program would combine the best aspects of defined contribution (DC) and defined benefit (DB) plans. Demand more from savers, then provide a payout at retirement; the challenge is doing that sustainably for participants. 

«