Stock-Drop Case against UBS Tossed

March 29, 2011 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A federal judge in New York has thrown out a stock-drop lawsuit against UBS AG and UBS Financial Services Inc.

U.S. District Judge Richard J. Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the action against the UBS companies after ruling plaintiffs would have to prove that plan fiduciaries abused their discretion in keeping company stock as a retirement plan investment  option– a bar he said plaintiffs were unable to cross. Sullivan said his ruling came despite the 69% drop in UBS share price.

As do many jurists handling stock-drop cases, Sullivan applied the presumption of prudence typically awarded to fiduciaries who offer company stock in their defined contribution plans. UBS’ difficulties did not rise to the level of “catastrophic failure” that would be necessary to overcome the presumption, Sullivan asserted.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“Given that, throughout the class period, UBS never reached the brink of imminent collapse, there remained a possibility that the value of UBS stock would rebound. In light of this possibility, and given that each plan presupposed that the fiduciaries would make the UBS Stock Fund available to plan participants, Defendants cannot be said to have abused their discretion,” the court said.

The UBS employees alleged that UBS stock was imprudent investment because of the share price decline from March 13, 2007, to October 16, 2008. The employees linked this substantial decline in UBS stock price to the impact of the housing market meltdown among other factors.

The case is In re UBS AG ERISA Litigation, S.D.N.Y., No. 1:08-cv-06696-RJS.

AL Retirement Program for Older Public Workers Repealed

March 29, 2011 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Alabama Governor Robert Bentley has signed a bill killing the state’s Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP).

The Montgomery Advertiser explained that DROP allows state and edu­cation employees who are 55 years old and have 25 years of service to receive salary and retirement benefits while continuing to work. Republicans felt it was nec­essary to eliminate the pro­gram, which they called a “luxury retirement pro­gram,” during these tough economic years, according to the news report.  

Before signing the bill, Bentley added an executive amendment allowing those who were eligible and who had signed up for the pro­gram before he signed the bill into law to still be enrolled. The governor’s lawyers were concerned about the legality of the bill although his advisers told legislators that extending the enrollment would be too costly and that they had evaluated the legality.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Bentley, in a statement, said he amended the bill to avoid “protracted litigation expense” and to “offer fur­ther clarification on the eligi­bility participation,” according to the Advertiser.  

Senate Presi­dent Pro Tem Del Marsh said the state could save $40 million to $50 million by eliminating the program.  

However, Democrats expressed concern that the state is eliminating a retire­ment program intended to keep quality teachers from retiring early or leaving for another state.

«