Administration September 23, 2013

Study Supports Increasing Equities During Retirement

September 23, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A rising equity glide path helps retirees sustain a greater income during their retirement years, a study suggests.
Reported by

Wade D. Pfau, The American College, and Michael E. Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group, explored the issue of what is an appropriate default equity glide path for client portfolios during the retirement phase of the life cycle. They found rising equity glide paths in retirement—in which the portfolio starts out conservative and becomes more aggressive through the retirement time horizon—have the potential to actually reduce both the probability of failure and the magnitude of failure for client portfolios.

According to the research report, generally, depending on the underlying assumptions, the optimal starting equity exposures are around 20% to 40% and they finish at around 40% to 80%.When modeled relative to the success of a 4% or 5% withdrawal rate in particular, the results varied depending on the details of the return assumptions and the target spending level. an initial allocation of only 30% in equities at retirement, rising to 80% by the end of retirement, actually provided the highest success.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The research implies the traditional approach of maintaining constant asset allocations in retirement to which the client is routinely rebalanced are actually far less than optimal. While such an approach is superior to decreasing equity exposure through retirement, the results of the study reveal the best solution may be to steadily increase equity exposure throughout retirement.

The findings are counterintuitive from the traditional perspective that equity exposure should decrease as the retiree’s time horizon decreases. The researchers explain that the success of a retirement scenario is heavily influenced by the sequence of returns. If the returns are good early, the retiree is so far ahead relative to the original goal, that a subsequent bear market in the second half of retirement has little impact, they contend. If the returns are bad in the first half of retirement, the portfolio is so stressed that the good returns that follow are crucial to carry the portfolio through to the end.

The research paper, “Reducing Retirement Risk with a Rising Equity Glide-Path,” can be downloaded from here.

Opinions September 23, 2013

Begin Your Path to Wellness Compliance Now

September 23, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Employers increasingly realize that healthier employees give them an edge over the competition; that’s why top companies are developing creative ways to engage workers in wellness initiatives and improving personal health.
Reported by

However, it’s not easy to determine what is and isn’t legal when it comes to wellness.

On June 3, 2013, the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services and Labor and Treasury released final rules on Incentives for Nondiscriminatory Wellness Programs in Group Health Plans. These amend the 2006 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) non-discrimination and wellness provisions, which prohibit group health plans from discriminating against an individual because of his or her health. 

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Starting January 1, 2014, these newly clarified rules take effect for employers offering incentives for health-contingent wellness programs through a group health plan. Given the short time frame until the rules take effect, now is the time to evaluate wellness initiatives to ensure compliance.

Employers should design wellness strategies to promote health and prevent disease, not as a way to discriminate against individuals with health risks. Application of these five wellness requirements depends on whether the plan is “participatory” (offered to all employees regardless of health status) or “health-contingent” (giving a reward to those who meet a health-related standard, whether outcome-based or activity-only).

If your wellness initiative is considered health-contingent, it must follow these five requirements:

1.     All individuals must have the opportunity to qualify for the reward at least once per year.

·         SAME as the original guidance.

2.     The total of all health-contingent wellness rewards, whether for one or multiple health factors and activities, is limited to 30% of the total cost of employee-only health coverage. Programs designed to prevent or reduce tobacco use may increase the total tobacco-related reward to 50% of employee-only health coverage.

·         CHANGE - The total amount of the reward increased from 20%. Yet, the average employer incentive ranges from 3% to 11%.

3.     The program must have a reasonable chance of improving health or preventing disease without discriminating based on a health factor. A reasonably designed program must not be overly burdensome, discriminate based on a heath factor or be suspect in method.

·         SAME with clarification.

4.     The program must provide reasonable alternative standards to those who don’t meet the initial standard. You must provide the reasonable alternative for all health-contingent wellness program rewards, or the standard can be waived for an entire class or on an individual basis.

·         SAME with a number of clarifications which specify if an individual completes a reasonable alternative mid-plan year, the same full-plan year reward must be awarded retroactively to the beginning of the year or prorated through the rest of the year.

5.     You must communicate the ability to qualify for the reward through a reasonable alternative standard, or the possibility of a waiver of the standard in all plan materials.

·         SAME with new sample language.

 

In compliance matters, seek the advice of your attorney. Talk with your consultant or wellness partner to ensure your wellness initiative is reasonably designed to promote health and prevent disease, and to determine whether your current wellness rewards approach requires changes. Engaging employees requires more than incentives. A healthy workplace culture starts with commitment from senior leaders and direct supervisors, and is reinforced by passionate front line employees. Consider how a healthy workforce may contribute to your organization’s performance, and work with your consultant or internal partners to develop a plan to achieve it.

 

Laura Hoag is a Senior Consultant with Findley Davies’ Health and Group Benefits Practice, specializing in integrating wellness programs into health care strategy and organizational culture.   

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

«