Supreme Court Asked to Review Sufficiency of Excessive Fee Imprudence Claims

In a case against Northwestern University, the petitioners ask whether allegations that a plan paid or charged its participants fees that exceeded fees for alternative available investment products are sufficient to state a claim.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs in a lawsuit alleging breaches of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) fiduciary duties by fiduciaries of two Northwestern University retirement plans have filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court.

The petition says appellate courts in the 3rd and 8th U.S. Circuits have held that a plan participant can adequately plead a breach of fiduciary duty by claiming that the retirement plan charged excessive fees when lower-cost alternatives existed. It notes that the 7th U.S. Court of Appeals held in the Northwestern case that such pleadings “are insufficient to state a claim, because it is necessary to credit the defendant’s explanation for not offering lower cost options for the retirement plan before allowing a well-pleaded complaint to proceed.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The question before the Supreme Court is: “Whether allegations that a defined contribution [DC] retirement plan paid or charged its participants fees that substantially exceeded fees for alternative available investment products or services are sufficient to state a claim against plan fiduciaries for breach of the duty of prudence under ERISA.”

The petition claims that the 7th Circuit’s decision threatens to stop progress the plaintiffs’ attorneys say has happened because of excessive fee litigation against DC retirement plans. It cites a federal district court decision in a case against Johns Hopkins University in which the court said litigation “on behalf of participants in large 401(k) and 403(b) plans has significantly improved these plans, brought to light fiduciary misconduct that has detrimentally impacted the retirement savings of American workers and dramatically brought down fees in defined contribution plans.”

The petition says the case “presents an excellent vehicle to address a recurring issue of national importance.”

The Supreme Court has invited the acting solicitor general to file a brief in the case expressing the views of the United States.

Transamerica Debuts Student Loan Repayment Program

It enables sponsors to shift their benefits dollars to the retirement plan or to an employee’s student loan servicer.

Employers that use Transamerica as the recordkeeper for their retirement plan now have access to Transamerica’s Student Loan Repayment Program to help workers pay back student loans.

The program allows employers to shift their benefit dollars, allowing them to make contributions to the employee’s retirement plan or student loan servicer. Transamerica notes that because clients will already have their retirement plan recordkept with it, the process will be streamlined. The program also enables participants to consolidate or refinance their loans.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Sponsors can choose from one of three providers to power the student loan repayment: Common Bond, Futurefuel.io and Tuition.io. Transamerica says each provider has a state-of-the-art online platform.

“Transamerica recognizes that student loans continue to be an especially heavy burden for employees,” says Kent Callahan, chief executive officer of Transamerica’s workplace solutions division. “While federal student loan repayments are deferred for the remainder of 2020, many employees with privately held student loans are still seeking relief. Many more employees will be looking for support once their loan payments begin again. We know that wealth and health are connected. Workers struggling with debt can have higher stress and may become less productive.”

«