Survey: Endowments and Foundations Favor Hedge Fund
Regulation
September 20, 2004 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - The majority
of endowments and foundations that invest in hedge funds
support the proposed regulation by the Security and Exchange
Commission (SEC) that would require these alternative
investment vehicles to register as Registered Investment
Advisors (RIA).
>According to the Hennessee Group’s 2004 Foundation
and Endowment Survey of 46 foundations and endowments that
invested in hedge funds, 59% were in favor of the proposal
requiring hedge funds to register with the SEC under the
Investment Advisors Act of 1940.
>However, the 31% who did not support such a move
manage three times as much capital and allocate 46% more to
hedge funds. They also have 50% more experience investing
in hedge funds.
>The survey also finds that those who favor
registration have on average 15% of their assets allocated
to hedge funds, with 8% invested directly and 7% invested
through a fund of hedge funds vehicle. An average of 22% of
assets are in hedge funds for those who oppose
registration, with 15% being invested directly.
A survey released Friday by the National Social
Insurance Board (NSIB) of Sweden showed that 40% of the
population thinks it’s acceptable to skip work because they
are feeling tired or are having trouble getting along with
co-workers. Sixty-five percent felt they could take sick
leave if they were feeling stressed at work. Seventy-one
percent thought family problems entitled them to sometimes
or always miss work.
The government is in charge of the extensive welfare
system that, among other things, covers sick leave, and the
price of increasingly absent employees is taking its toll.
Sick leave compensation tripled from $2 billion in 1997 to
$6 billion in 2002. In response to the increasing levels of
paid sick leave, the government plans to launch a large
national campaign to inform people that only illness is a
valid reason to miss work, according to the Associated
Press.
The survey indicates “a deep lack of knowledge about
what the health insurance is meant to cover,” NSIB director
Anna Hedborg asserted, according to the AP.
Others looked at the situation in a more cynical light.
“The insurance laws clearly state that inability to work
because of illness” is the only valid reason to take sick
leave, states Alf Eckerhall, a social insurance expert with
the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, according to the
AP. “The key word is ‘inability to work’ – not ‘illness.'”
He claims that Swedes are intentionally abusing a system.
He cites the habit of leaving work early to call in sick,
thus circumventing the fact that compensation for sick
leave does not start until the second day of leave.
In , the employer pays for the first three weeks’ sick
leave and workers can call in sick for seven days before
needing a doctor’s certificate or medical proof.
People who call in sick do not receive any compensation for
the first day they are absent.
But Eckerhall said many are abusing the current system by
leaving work and calling in sick shortly before their work
day is over. That then counts as one sick day, which lets
them start receiving sick pay the next day.
“That means your day without compensation was 15 minutes
long,” Eckerhall said, according to the report.
The poll was taken of 1,002 people from June 17-24.