Get more! Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.
Survey Finds Many Women Underinsured
A survey sponsored by The Hartford Group, an
insurance provider, found that two-thirds of moms say it
is “extremely” or “very important” for their spouse or
partner to have disability insurance, compared with only
half who say it is “extremely” or “very important” to
have coverage themselves. A news release said the poll
found less than half of mothers (47%) who work outside
the home have short-term disability insurance and even
fewer (37%) have long-term disability coverage.
Another possible reason for mothers’ lack of disability
coverage is that many are unaware of their vulnerability
and what conditions constitute a disability, the release
said. Only 24% of mothers surveyed say they completely
understand disability insurance. Sixty-one percent of
moms surveyed think accidents or injuries are the leading
cause of short-term disability.
“The burden on mothers today is enormous, including
contributing half and in some cases, all of the household
income. Yet, many are not taking an important step to
safeguard their family finances,” said Laura Marzi,
assistant vice president in The Hartford’s Group Benefits
Division, in the news release.
The Hartford suggested one possible reason mothers
perceive a less critical need for income protection is
that they often draw smaller salaries than their spouse.
In The Hartford’s survey, nearly half of moms polled say
they earn under $50,000 per year, with 64% of single
mothers earning $25,000 to $50,000 annually. In
comparison, a majority of fathers (54%) surveyed draw an
annual income of $50,000 to $100,000.
Marzi noted that 97% of mothers surveyed report they
would have to change their lifestyle if they lost part of
their family’s income for three to six months. In
addition, only 6% of moms say that they have saved enough
to live off their savings in case they become disabled.
For The Hartford’s survey, independent market research
agency Opinauri, Inc., conducted an online survey polling
971 U.S. adults, aged 18-64, in February 2008.
You Might Also Like:
EEOC Says 74-Year-Old Worker Forced to Retire After Medical Leave
EEOC Wellness Program Rule Lawsuit Decided in Favor of AARP
The district court had previously ruled against the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, finding AARP did not prove irreparable...
EEOC, Orion Reach Agreement on Wellness Program Challenge
« Institutional Investors Increasing Hedge Fund and PE Allocations