2022
DC Plan Benchmarking Survey

By studying trends in DC plan design and usage, sponsors can benchmark and improve their own plans.

2022 Survey

2022 Survey

Respondent Profile

Respondents, by Plan Size

<$10MM
50%
$10MM – $50MM
23%
>$50MM – $200MM
13%
$200MM – $1B
8%
>$1B
6%

Respondents, by Plan Type Offered

401(k)
66%
403(b)
5%
457
5%
ESOP/KSOP
2%
Profit Sharing
12%
Money Purchase
1%
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation (NQDC)
6%
SEP
0%
SIMPLE
1%
Other
2%

Respondents, by Industry

Manufacturing
13%
Health Care
8%
Banking / Financial Services
8%
Building / Construction / Contracting
7%
Law Firm
5%
Retail
5%
Technology / Telecommunications
3%
Wholesale / Distribution
4%
Government
2%
All Other* Industries
45%
* "Other" category is spread across 35 other unique industries.



Plan Sizes

It has long been put forward that differences in plan size correlate to differences in plan design, with larger plans—i.e., those with $200 million or more in plan assets—using their size and scale to adopt higher levels of plan oversight and lower investment fees. Such plans are also frequently the first to use more progressive design features. For example, larger plans were among the first to adopt automatic enrollment and remain more likely to offer the feature today, although smaller plans are catching up. Large plans are also more likely to follow some accepted fiduciary best practices, such as having an investment committee.

Offers Automatic Enrollment

<$5MM
24%
$5MM – $50MM
50%
>$50MM – $200MM
73%
>$200MM – $1B
70%
>$1B
76%

Uses an Investment Committee for DC Plan

<$5MM
20%
$5MM – $50MM
36%
>$50MM – $200MM
59%
>$200MM – $1B
56%
>$1B
63%

Average Asset-Weighted Expense Ratio of All Investment Options

<25 bps
25–50 bps
>50 bps
<$5MM
27%
42%
14%
$5MM – $50MM
28%
41%
22%
>$50MM – $200MM
32%
45%
19%
>$200MM – $1B
36%
48%
13%
>$1B
58%
37%
3%

Defined Contribution Plans, By Asset Range

<$1MM
11%
$1MM – $5MM
26%
$5MM – $10MM
14%
$10MM – $25MM
13%
$25MM – $50MM
10%
$50MM – $100MM
7%
$100MM – $200MM
5%
$200MM – $500MM
5%
$500MM – $1B
3%
>$1B
6%



Plan Types

The 401(k) plan is the most common employer-sponsored retirement plan. However, looking at 403(b) and 457 plan types, which are connected to specific employee populations and subject to different regulatory requirements, reveals those types are more likely to be structured for retirees. They are much more likely to offer systematic withdrawals at retirement and immediate eligibility to participate in the plan upon hire. 403(b) plans are more likely to offer retirement income products, perhaps due to legacy plans that traditionally offered such options to teachers. All plan types, however, show the same level of in-person advice and guidance opportunities for participants.

Offers Systematic Withdrawals at Retirement

401(k)
35%
403(b)
53%
457
53%

Offers In-Plan Retirement Income Products

401(k)
7%
403(b)
14%
457
8%

Offers Plans With Immediate Eligibility Upon Hiring

401(k)
24%
403(b)
63%
457
60%

Offers Participants One-on-One Meetings With Financial Planner/Adviser Outside of the Plan

401(k)
51%
403(b)
55%
457
52%



Contributions

Employer contributions that do not require participant deferrals are offered by about half of DC plans. Unlike matching contributions, which are only given to participants actively deferring into the DC plan, nonelective and profit-sharing contributions are allocated to all employees. The most popular contribution structure is a “pro-rata” profit sharing plan in which each participant receives an allocation equal to a uniform percentage of his or her compensation. One-quarter of plans are using safe harbor contributions, which allow them to provide employees with a minimum saving amount and not have to go through annual discrimination testing.

Offer a Non-Elective or Profit-Sharing Contributions

  • Yes
  • No
  • Unsure

Profit-Sharing / Non-Matching Structure

"Pro-Rata" Profit Sharing Plan
37%
Non-elective Safe Harbor Contribution
25%
"New Comparability" Profit Sharing Plan
14%
"Fixed Dollar" Profit Sharing Plan
3%
"Age weighted" Profit Sharing Plan
2%
Other
10%
Unsure
9%

Profit-Sharing / Non-Matching Contribution Rates

Less than 3%
21%
Exactly 3%
19%
>3% – 5%
22%
>5% – 7%
9%
>7% – 10%
9%
More than 10%
6%
Other
14%

Offer Matching Contribution

Yes
74%
No
24%
Unsure
2%



Employer Match

Employer matches have long been seen as a way to encourage participants to save in their DC plan, and three-quarters of DC plans offer matching contributions to their participants. Eligibility to receive matching contributions has decreased in past years: 80% of plans now make participants eligible for the match as soon as they are eligible to contribute to the plan. More than one-third of plans also offer immediate vesting of the match. However, another one-third have vesting of five years or more, and 60% of all plans offer a graded vesting schedule instead of a cliff, meaning matched contributions vest in increasing amounts over some sort of time period, with an allowed maximum of six years.

Participants Eligible for Match

Immediately once eligible
80%
Eligible participants must wait up to 1 year
11%
Eligible participants must wait 1 year or more
8%
Unsure
1%

When Participants Are 100% Vested

Immediately upon enrollment
36%
1 year or less
4%
2 years
6%
3 years
13%
4 years
3%
5 years
20%
More than 5 years
15%
Unsure
3%

Matching Contributions Vesting Schedule

  • Cliff — 100% vested at a designated time of service
  • Graded — vested in increasing amounts over time
  • Unsure



Industry Types

Especially in the recent labor market, benefits programs are an important part of the competition for talent. Employers need to offer retirement programs that attract and retain the right people, which means finding a relevant group of peers/competitors within an industry context is a critical part of any benchmarking exercise. For example, employees of retail organizations or construction firms likely have needs and expectations that differ from those in financial services or law firms. That gives rise to differences in design areas, such as the use of re-enrollment, profit-sharing contributions and in-plan Roth conversions.

Offer Non-Elective or Profit-Sharing Contributions*

*These contributions generally do NOT require participant contributions.  
Building / Construction
30%
Banking / Financial Services
51%
Health Care
48%
Law Firm
50%
Manufacturing—Consumer Products
60%
Manufacturing—Industrial Products
57%
Retail
53%
Technology / Telecommunications
53%
Wholesale / Distribution
46%
All Other Industries
48%

In-Plan Roth Conversions Allowed

Building / Construction
30%
Banking / Financial Services
60%
Health Care
48%
Law
57%
Manufacturing—Consumer Products
45%
Manufacturing—Industrial Products
32%
Retail
53%
Technology / Telecommunications
57%
Wholesale / Distribution
46%
All Other Industries
50%

Performed “Re-enrollment” in the Past Three Years

Building / Construction
84%
Banking / Financial Services
89%
Health Care
85%
Law
92%
Manufacturing—Consumer Products
84%
Manufacturing—Industrial Products
85%
Retail
84%
Technology / Telecommunications
87%
Wholesale / Distribution
84%
All Other Industries
84%


PLANSPONSOR 2023 Industry Reports

2023 Industry Reports feature proprietary data collected by PLANSPONSOR in its annual Defined Contribution Survey. The reports highlight various plan design features and outcomes from approximately 50 industries.

You can leverage the PLANSPONSOR Industry Reports* to: 
  • Build trust with advisers and provide new tools to your staff and network
  • 99+ pages in PDF format
  • Compare plan design with peers and competitors, and improve fiduciary oversight
  • Add value to your clients by posting on your website behind registration

*Subject to usage terms/compliance in licensing agreement.

Availability: December 2022
Contact Rob Reif / 212-217-6906 / robert.reif@issmediasolutions.com