The Option of Total Retirement Outsourcing

Increasing plan complexity and fiduciary liability continue to steer employers toward this growing trend.

Employers are searching for technology-based solutions to reduce the administrative burdens and complexity associated with managing multiple retirement plans.

Brian Robb headshot

Brian Robb

Increased regulation and growth in lawsuits from participants have organizations wrestling with growing costs and accountability for their retirement plans. Total Retirement Outsourcing has emerged as a solution for employers looking to leverage their human resources staff, keep up with new regulations and compliance duties and simply gain more value from the dollars they spend on their retirement programs.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

TRO providers specialize in the administration of all qualified and nonqualified retirement plans sponsored by a particular organization, including both traditional and hybrid-designed defined benefit/pension plans, 401(k), 403(b) and 457(b) defined contribution plans, and nonqualified deferred compensation programs for highly compensated employees. The most sophisticated service providers also offer independent institutional investment advisory services, delivering an efficient solution for employers seeking optimum convenience.

Comingling retirement plan administration with investment advisory oversight could provide significant benefits, such as:

  • Portfolio alignment and fiduciary oversight throughout the process
  • A knowledgeable plan administration partner delivering access to technology and services
  • Annuity placement experts focused on plan sponsors’ goals
  • Integrated project management with a single point of contact
  • Coordinated employee education focused on retirement planning and long-term investing
  • Greater visibility into the value of the entire retirement program

How Does TRO Benefit Employers and Their Employees?

Retirement plan sponsors continue to shift plan administration to external service providers at a rapid rate.

According to the Callan Institute’s 2022 Defined Contribution Trends Survey, the total retirement outsourcing market is growing, with the share of plans outsourced increasing to 17% in 2022 from 13% in 2017.

The study also found that the most common reasons for outsourcing are to reduce costs, improve efficiency and free up internal resources.

With a TRO strategy, retirement plan sponsors and their participants benefit in several ways:

Consolidates Plan Administration

A typical HR department can spend more than half its time on routine retirement plan tasks, such as processing paperwork, answering participant questions and collecting and maintaining data. To reduce the amount of time HR spends on these tasks, many organizations engage an outside service provider to manage day-to-day administrative duties.

Since an integral part of TRO revolves around robust technology, the best platforms should provide optimum efficiency throughout the entire process, such as:

  • Single payroll feed to update all participant records across multiple plans, resulting in accurate, consistent and up-to-date data used in plan processing
  • Consolidated reporting to provide a holistic view of participant information, trust reports, performance reporting and other required management information
  • Combined nondiscrimination testing to help simplify the testing process
  • Merged benefit application process with one benefit application package customized to the needs of the retiring employee
  • Workflow management to assign and track internal tasks, issues and questions, and to communicate about projects in real time

The administration platform must also be flexible to adapt to organizational changes and evolving retirement plan offerings. With cyberthreats on the rise, it is paramount that strong security protocols are in place with any online system. To avoid fraud, the system should provide single sign-on access for plan participants, multi-level authentication and be reviewed and validated by an external cybersecurity auditor annually to ensure it continues to meet changing standards.

Eliminates the Need to Manage Multiple Vendors

TRADITIONAL SERVICE MODEL
Employers may work with several advisers and consultants which require them to act as the conduit for plan updates and communications. Despite the diligence of plan management, the dynamics of this administrative model invites communication and collaboration issues.

MODERN SERVICE MODEL
Alternatively, a modern TRO service model solves the employer’s coordination and communication dilemma by placing an external relationship manager over an experienced team of benefits professionals. This model creates administrative efficiencies while enabling employers to accomplish more with less effort.

Offers Employee Education, Tools and Access

Over the years, retirement plan participants have naturally become more financially aware and internet savvy. They expect employers to provide education and tools that assist them with making informed financial decisions. For these reasons, TRO providers must be able to offer participants online access to their personal data and statements, the ability to run multiple retirement plan scenarios, make investment elections, obtain benefit election packages, receive communication from their employer and more … all through single sign-on to a retirement portal from any device with an internet connection.

Although many participants rely on modern conveniences provided by an online portal, some may prefer a more personal touch when assistance is needed. In addition to online services, a TRO provider must be able to offer a service center staffed with representatives who are equipped to answer questions, help with website navigation and assist with forms or other paperwork.

Additional participant materials, whether online or in printed form, further reinforce the integration of multiple retirement plans. Enrollment materials and welcome packets, plan highlights, participant statements, benefit application kits and other communications can be consolidated to increase efficiency and deliver a unified message to the participant on the benefits offered within the retirement programs of the employer.

Delivers Maximum Flexibility and Convenience

Employers may move toward a fully integrated approach in stages or continue to use outside providers for certain critical facets of plan management. They may also wish to retain their independent actuary or investment adviser, or may want to participate in, or retain, certain communications and administration tasks. The TRO provider must offer the flexibility to collaborate with other providers and tailor its services to the organization’s needs.

An effective TRO provider must be able to offer:

  • An investment approach that accommodates full or partial use of outside investment advisers, in addition to its own investment advisory and investment management capabilities
  • Automated custodial, trust administration and benefit payment services that are integrated with the administrative systems used to maintain participant data and account information
  • Customized participant education that reflects the company’s culture and the desired messages from management
  • Proactive actuarial and compliance services to assist with financial management of the retirement programs, monitor and manage regulatory compliance and act as an extension of management staff to advise and recommend changes as needed to meet the company’s changing needs. If an independent consultant is retained, the TRO provider must be able to efficiently provide data and work as a team with those professionals to provide the needed services

Weigh the Benefits Before Making a Decision

Employers who outsource the administration of their retirement plans experience a reduction in the overall cost of communications, administrative paperwork and time spent working with multiple service providers—allowing them to focus on strategic business tasks.

These employers also experience an increase in employee satisfaction due to the enhanced communication capabilities offered by the plan’s outsourcing provider. Working with a TRO provider that offers flexibility in its services can produce measurable efficiencies and substantial return on investment to the company.

However, there are some risks associated with TRO, such as:

  • Some employers may feel uncertain because the service provider will be making decisions about the plan’s investments, recordkeeping and other administrative areas
  • Plan fees may increase due to expanded services that provide online services and conveniences for both the employer and employee
  • Potential conflicts of interest that could impact the plan’s investments or other decisions

Employers should be diligent when seeking to consolidate plan management service providers. However, with TRO in place, the organization’s lengthy list of retirement plan responsibilities becomes shorter. These employers also enjoy the confidence that comes from having experts handling the entire process from beginning to end while also delivering on employee expectations.


Brian Robb is senior vice president and sales leader at USI Consulting Group.

This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal or tax advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice. Any opinions of the author do not necessarily reflect the stance of ISS Stoxx or its affiliates.

PSNC 2024: ‘Executive’ Decisions

Early findings from an annual survey show plan sponsors are providing nonqualified deferred compensation programs to a wider range of employees, a Newport executive says.

Plan sponsors are seeking ways to expand retirement savings options for employees, according to a nonqualified deferred compensation expert speaking recently at the 2024 PLANSPONSOR National Conference in Chicago.

“What we’ve seen is a lot of plan sponsors going down in the income range [for nonqualified deferred compensation] because of lack of ability for somebody to defer enough money into the 401(k),” said Clay Kennedy, vice president of insurance and nonqualified retirement plans at Newport, an Ascensus company. “Before we were seeing [salary ranges] of $200,000 or $250,000 in income that got you invited into the plan … we’re seeing that number go down a little bit as we’re seeing more emphasis on retirement savings.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Kennedy added C-suite executives are also focused on retirement, as many may have high salaries and compensation programs, but still need to work on income replacement in retirement.

“Some people think that this is only for executives, and they’ve got the money and aren’t worried about retirement saving,” he said. “But they have a great need for retirement savings because of the gap in what statutory limits are.”

Kennedy’s comments, made on June 6 at the conference, were not just anecdotal; he was presenting preliminary findings from a NQDC survey fielded every other year by Newport and PLANSPONSOR.

Among those findings was that the top goal for the use of nonqualified plans among sponsors, not surprisingly, was talent attraction and retention.

But interestingly, Kennedy said, the focus on this area has grown, not diminished, even as the economy has moved on from the COVID pandemic and the Great Resignation.

“Half of the plans that we worked on last year were focused on that recruiting and retention strategy,” he says.

Lower down the list, but still among the top five goals for using nonqualified plans, was the financial wellness benefit of offering a nonqualified compensation plan.

Kennedy noted that, while plan sponsors may not often think about this aspect of the offering, it can help higher-paid employees not just with savings, but with managing that retirement savings and having access to resources and advice. The Newport executive cited research finding that many high-paid executives “don’t truly understand their compensation and benefits.”

“It’s really important to educate these folks to help them with financial wellness …. and to educate them about the benefits and how to use those benefits,” he said.

This financial wellness aspect of nonqualified plan offerings also goes toward a need for improved communication and education around the plan. Kennedy noted that, among DC plan sponsors offering nonqualified compensation, there are some that aren’t totally pleased with the services, in part due to “feeling like their participants are less satisfied with education and communication.”

Addressing this need, Kennedy noted, can come from a focus on plan design to really make the nonqualified deferred compensation worthwhile. Companies can decide on who is eligible based on a variety of factors, including title, wage earnings, or whatever parameters they feel will lead to best results.

“What money can go into deferred compensation plans?” Kennedy asked the audience. “For those of you who don’t have a plan right now, it’s a pretty simple answer: Any earned income paid by the company is eligible to go into the deferred comp plan.”

That can come by way of company matching that, like the 401(k) plan, is communicated clearly and as part of the full benefits package to employees.

“Just because you may not want to defer your own money does not mean that the company can’t give you some dollars as a reward or some type of retention strategy,” he said.

Meanwhile, Kennedy noted a trend that plan sponsors are moving toward nonqualified compensation programs that are not bundled with recordkeeper services. He noted that, as plan sponsors seek to meet more needs via the program, the “bare bones” services via the recordkeeping platform may not be enough.

He admitted his bias working for an unbundled provider, but made the case that if the nonqualified plan is “a key component of the business model, [the recordkeeper] may not have the nonqualified specialist communications relationship managers … it is a very different beast, as you well know, than a 401(k).”

Newport and PLANSPONSOR surveyed 268 non-qualified deferred compensation plan sponsors; findings were discussed on June 13 in a webinar hosted by PLANSPONSOR, which can be watched on-demand at this link.

«