Towers Watson Clients Double Smart Beta Asset Flows

February 19, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Institutional investors working with Towers Watson more than doubled asset flows moving into “smart beta” strategies last year, reaching $11 billion of inflows in 2013.

Smart beta strategies don’t have a precise definition, but the term generally refers to investment programs that take advantage of both active and passive investing principals. Generally, a smart beta portfolio uses rules-based investment strategies that do not rely on traditional market-capitalization weighting to set asset allocations within an index-tracking portfolio.

Historically, smart beta strategies weighted a portfolio’s asset allocations by the security issuer’s revenues, earnings or gross domestic product, among other rules. Popular strategies today include equal weighting, fundamental weighting and minimum variance weighting.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Towers Watson says the strong growth in smart beta strategies among its institutional clients is not surprising, as institutions have long been expressing interest in alternative strategies (see “Institutions Like Smart Beta”) that can provide lower fees. Put simply, smart beta assumes that better diversification and rebalancing rules can generate returns that exceed the capitalization-weighted index without expanded risk or excessive oversight. Like indexed investments, smart beta’s most attractive features typically include low management fees, high transparency and low asset turnover, but great diversity exists in the space.

Data released by Towers Watson shows about $1 billion of the $4 billion that clients invested in real estate during 2013 moved through smart beta portfolios, followed by a third of investments made in direct hedge funds, at more than $3 billion. The firm also saw institutional clients put $2 billion into infrastructure-related investments through smart beta investments during 2013.

The $11 billion in total inflows across over 180 portfolios is up more than 100% from the $5 billion placed in smart beta across 130 portfolios in 2012, the firm says. Towers Watson’s clients globally have now allocated over $32 billion to smart beta strategies in almost 500 portfolios, across a range of asset classes.

“It is no surprise that smart beta strategies are being implemented at this rate, given their inherent relevance for most institutional investors,” says Craig Baker, global head of investment research at Towers Watson. “Interestingly, it has taken some time to get to this point, given that we started developing the concept in 2000 as part of our work on structured alpha, then in more detail in 2002, as beta prime.”

Baker says that, while his firm is satisfied that its clients have been able to benefit from a range of smart beta strategies, Towers Watson is concerned about the proliferation of products now on the market that claim to be smart beta, particularly in the equity area.

The data also show that, last year, Towers Watson’s institutional clients —which include pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and insurance companies—carried out alternative asset class selections worth more than four times as much (over $12.5 billion) as they did five years ago.

Among alternatives, real estate attracted the most interest (over $4 billion), where about 25% is in smart beta, followed by direct hedge funds (over $3 billion) and infrastructure (over $2 billion), where about one-third was in smart beta strategies. In the same period, direct private equity attracted approximately $1.5 billion, while illiquid credit (distressed debt and lending) attracted roughly $1 billion in assets, the firm says.

“Throughout the past five years, the alternative fund managers that we have put into client portfolios have shown their ability to adapt to the changing environment to generate good net-of-fees performances,” Baker says.

Baker predicts that larger institutional funds are likely to continue investing in funds directly for most alternative asset classes, rather than via funds of funds. That’s a result of expanding focus on securing better fee structures, greater transparency and the growth of more advanced smart beta options, he says.

“Indeed, there were only three fund of hedge funds mandate selections in 2013, which demonstrates this point,” he says.

According to the data, bond selections by Towers Watson’s clients in 2013 totaled $22 billion, of which the majority were invested in global (approximately $11 billion) and U.S. (roughly $5 billion) mandates, followed by emerging market mandates (about $3 billion). In 2013, the total number of multi-region bond selections exceeded the combined total of all single-region bond mandates, the firm says.

“These figures confirm a longer-term trend of investors seeking greater efficiency, diversification and diversity in bond mandates, for example, favoring global solutions over a home-market bias, and an increasing acceptance of alternative credit asset classes into the strategic asset mix,” says Baker.

In equities, global mandates totaling approximately $10 billion continued to be the most popular with Towers Watson's clients in 2013, followed by U.S. equity (roughly $3 billion), global ex-U.S. equity and U.S. small- and mid-cap equity mandates (each approximately $2 billion). In total, equity mandate selections last year accounted for approximately $24 billion in assets.

European Cities Rated with Highest Quality of Living

February 19, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Vienna is the city with the world’s best quality of living, according to a new survey by consulting firm Mercer.

According to the “2014 Quality of Living Survey,” European cities dominate the list of the best places to live. Zurich and Auckland follow in second and third place, respectively. Munich is in fourth place, followed by Vancouver, which is also the highest-ranking city in North America. Globally, Singapore is the highest-ranking Asian city, whereas Dubai ranks first across the Middle East and Africa. The city of Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe, takes the top spot for Central and South America.

Mercer conducts the survey annually to help multinational companies and other employers compensate employees fairly when placing them on international assignments. Hundreds of cities around the world are reviewed for the survey.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“Political instability, high crime levels, and elevated air pollution are a few factors that can be detrimental to the daily lives of expatriate employees, their families, and local residents,” says Slagin Parakatil, senior researcher at Mercer, based in New York. “To ensure that compensation packages reflect the local environment appropriately, employers need a clear picture of the quality of living in the cities where they operate.” 

Parakatil adds that in a world economy that is becoming more globalized, cities beyond the traditional financial and business centers are working to improve their quality of living so they can attract more foreign companies. “This year’s survey recognizes so-called ‘second tier’ or ‘emerging’ cites and points to a few examples from around the world. These cities have been investing massively in their infrastructure and attracting foreign direct investments by providing incentives such as tax, housing, or entry facilities. Emerging cities will become major players that traditional financial centers and capital cities will have to compete with.”

Best and Worst in Europe

Vienna is the highest-ranking city globally. In Europe, it is followed by Zurich, Munich, Düsseldorf and Frankfurt.

“European cities enjoy a high overall quality of living compared to those in other regions. Health care, infrastructure, and recreational facilities are generally of a very high standard. Political stability and relatively low crime levels enable expatriates to feel safe and secure in most locations. The region has seen few changes in living standards over the last year,” says Parakatil.

Tbilisi, Georgia, is the lowest ranking city in Europe. However, it continues to improve in its quality of living, mainly due to a growing availability of consumer goods, improving internal stability, and developing infrastructure. Other cities on the lower end of Europe’s ranking include Minsk, Belarus; Yerevan, Armenia; Tirana, Albania; and St. Petersburg, Russia.

Best and Worst in the Americas

Canadian cities dominate North America’s top-five list. Ranking fifth globally, Vancouver tops the regional list, followed by Ottawa, Toronto, Montreal and San Francisco. The region’s lowest-ranking city is Mexico City, preceded by four U.S. cities: Detroit, St. Louis, Houston and Miami.

Ed Hannibal, partner and global consulting leader for Mercer’s mobility practice, says that, on the whole, North American cities offer a high quality of living and are attractive working destinations for companies and their expatriates. “A wide range of consumer goods are available, and infrastructures, including recreational provisions, are excellent,” he says.

In Central and South America, the quality of living varies substantially. Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe, is the region’s highest-ranked city followed by San Juan, Montevideo, Buenos Aires and Santiago. Manaus, Brazil, has been identified as an example of an emerging city in this region due to its major industrial center, which has seen the creation of the “Free Economic Zone of Manaus,” an area with administrative autonomy giving Manaus a competitive advantage over other cities in the region. This zone has attracted talent from other cities and regions with several multinational companies already settled in the area and more expected to arrive in the near future.

“Several cities in Central and South America are still attractive to expatriates due to their relatively stable political environments, improving infrastructure, and pleasant climate,” says Hannibal. “But many locations remain challenging due to natural disasters, such as hurricanes often hitting the region, as well as local economic inequality and high crime rates. Companies placing their workers on expatriate assignments in these locations must ensure that hardship allowances reflect the lower levels of quality of living.”

Best and Worst in Asia Pacific

Singapore has the highest quality of living in Asia, followed by the four Japanese cities of Tokyo, Kobe, Yokohama and Osaka. Dushanbe, Tajikistan, is the lowest ranking city in the region. Parakatil comments, “Asia has a bigger range of quality-of-living standard among its cities than any other region. For many cities, such as those in South Korea, the quality of living is continually improving. But for others, such as some in China, issues like pervasive poor air pollution are eroding their quality of living.”

With their considerable growth in the last decade, many second-tier Asian cities are starting to emerge as important places of business for multinational companies. Examples include Cheonan, South Korea, which is strategically located in an area where several technology companies have operations. Over the past decades, Pune, India, has developed into an education hub and home to IT, high-tech industries, and automobile manufacturing. The city of Xian, China, has also witnessed some major developments, such as the establishment of an “Economic and Technological Development Zone” to attract foreign investments. The city is also host to various financial services, consulting, and computer services firms. 

Elsewhere, New Zealand and Australian cities rank high on the list for quality of living, with Auckland and Sydney ranking 3rd and 10th, respectively.

Best and Worst in Middle East and Africa

Dubai is the highest-ranked city in the Middle East and Africa region, followed by Abu Dhabi, UAE; Port Louis, Mauritius; and Durban and Cape Town, both in South Africa. Durban has been identified as an example of an emerging city in this region, due to the growth of its manufacturing industries and the increasing importance of the shipping port. Generally, this region dominates the lower end of the quality of living ranking, with five out of the bottom six cities. Baghdad has the lowest overall ranking.

“The Middle East, and especially Africa, remain one of the most challenging regions for multinational organizations and expatriates. Regional instability and disruptive political events, including civil unrest, lack of infrastructure, and natural disasters such as flooding, keep the quality of living from improving in many of its cities. However, some cities that might not have been very attractive to foreign companies are making efforts to attract them,” says Parakatil.

Data for the survey was largely collected between September and November 2013, and is updated regularly to take account of changing circumstances. In particular, the assessments are revised to reflect significant political, economic and environmental developments.

More information about the survey, including how to order a report reviewing its results, can be found here.

«