Transfers Head For Cover Amidst War News

April 11, 2003 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - While the pace of participant transfer activity continued to be relatively normal during March, volumes picked up just before - and just after - the beginning of the war with Iraq.

Trading volumes were mostly characterized as “normal” throughout the month, according to the Hewitt 401(k) Index, and averaged just 0.08% of total balances per day.   Still, trading was about 1.5 times normal on March 14 involving 0.13% of total balances.   Activity returned to normal – but at the high end of normal, with 0.12% and 0.11% of total balances transferred on the following two trading days immediately prior to the dropping of the first bombs on Iraq.   Interestingly enough, participants favored fixed-income investments on a net basis on the first day, flipped back to equities on the second day, and then again favored fixed-income investments on a net basis on March 18.

“Shock and Awe?”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Then, following a two-day respite, on Friday, March 21, following the kickoff of the “shock and awe” campaign, as major US stock indices climbed 2-3%, transfer activity picked up again, totaling nearly 2 times normal volumes on that Friday and the following Monday.   Once again, investors favored equity investments on the first day (likely buying in at the close of trading at a relatively high price), only to flee back to fixed income on a net basis the following session – as major stock indices shed 3.5% on average.     

Hewitt notes that it is typical for participants to move money toward equities on days when the market rises and toward fixed income on days when the market declines.   Of course, a participant who moves to equities on a day when the market rises rapidly will likely buy in at a high price, rather than benefit from the day’s run-up in price, and vice versa.   Fortunately, most don’t appear to be transferring those balances.   The Index tracks the activity of nearly 1.5 million participants with some $75 billion in assets.

Fixed “Incoming”

In March transferring monies headed to fixed-income investments on 57% of the trading days, a declining shift compared with the 89% and 67% of days that favored fixed income on a net basis during February and January.

Despite those shifts, Hewitt notes that there were only five above-normal transfer activity days in the entire first quarter.   Overall, for the first quarter, $660 million in balances shifted to GIC/stable value investments, primarily from large US equity and company stock investments.

GIC/stable is currently the largest asset class in the Hewitt 401(k) Index, at 28.94% of total balances, but company stock continues to represent 23.19%, and large US equity comprises nearly 20%.   Balanced offerings represent 6.87%, bonds 5.69%, and lifestyle funds made up 4.73% of the total participant balances at the end of March.

Large US equity offerings continue to be most popular for new contributions, evidenced by the nearly 25% of new monies deposited there.   Company stock drew 22.71% of March contributions, while GIC/stable value received nearly 19.5%.   Bond funds drew 7.10% and lifestyle funds received 5.53%.   Balanced funds got just 3.88% of the total, compared with small US equity, which drew 4.11% and international, which pulled nearly 4%.

Judge Denies PBGC Effort to Block Union's Data Request

October 16, 2002 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - A federal judge has turned aside efforts by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) to block the United Steelworkers of America from getting data about pension plans the federal pension insurer is trying to seize.

US District Judge Peter Economus of the Northern District of Ohio ruled that the PBGC wasn’t entitled to prevent the union from getting information on cases similar to the PBGC’s efforts to have Republic Technologies International’s plans terminated, Washington-based legal publisher BNA reported.

“Information regarding the PBGC’s practices in analogous scenarios is likely to assist the Court in ensuring that the PBGC’s selection of a termination date conformed with the PBGC’s general custom and practice,” Economus wrote. .

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

On June 14, 2002, PBGC filed a complaint against Republic and asked that the court establish that date as the plans’ termination date.

The United Steelworkers of America asked to get involved in the lawsuit for the purpose of challenging PBGC’s termination of two of the pension plans.

In its request to intervene, the union demanded that PBGC turn over information regarding how it selected June 14, 2002, as the plans’ termination date. In addition, the union asked that PBGC supply the union with data the PBGC used in selecting plan termination dates in analogous situations.

PBGC filed a motion for a protective order barring the union from obtaining the requested information. In particular, PBGC argued that the court must grant it deference as to the selected termination date and that information regarding the selection of termination dates in other situations was irrelevant in that such decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.

Denying PBGC’s motion, Economus said rather than ruling on whether it owed deference to PBGC’s decision, he said he was allowing additional research regarding PBGC’s selected termination date.

Republic allied itself with the steelworkers union earlier this year to oppose the PBGC’s efforts. See  Republic Lines up with Steelworkers, Opposes PBGC Action  . The union said it was c oncerned that union members would be shortchanged by the PBGC.

The case is Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Republic Technologies International LLC, N.D. Ohio, No. 5:02 CV 01116, 10/11/02.

«