Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.
Trident Microsystems Agrees to Settle Backdating Charges
On July 16, 2010, the SEC filed a civil action against Trident Microsystems, its founder and former Chief Executive Officer, Frank C. Lin, and its former Chief Accounting Officer, Peter Jen. According to an SEC news release, Trident consented to the entry of an order permanently enjoining it from violating Sections of the Securities Act of 1933 and of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Lin agreed to pay a $350,000 penalty and to be barred for five years from serving as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered with the Commission or that is required to file reports with the Commission. Lin also agreed to disgorge the “in-the-money” benefit he received upon his exercise of backdated option grants, plus pre-judgment interest thereon, for total disgorgement of $817,509, the news release said.
Jen agreed to pay a $50,000 penalty and to be barred for five years from serving as an officer or director of a public company. Jen also agreed to disgorge the “in-the-money” benefit he received upon his exercise of backdated option grants, plus pre-judgment interest thereon, totaling $359,819.
These settlements are subject to the approval of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
The SEC’s complaint alleges that from at least 1993 to May 2006, Trident, through the conduct of Lin and Jen, engaged in a fraudulent and deceptive scheme to provide undisclosed compensation to executives and other employees, concealing millions of dollars in expenses from the company’s shareholders. According to the complaint, Lin used, and directed others to use, hindsight to select for stock option grants dates that coincided with the dates of low closing prices for the company’s stock.
Details of the Charges
Lin backdated stock option documentation to make it appear as if options had been granted on earlier dates, resulting in disguised "in-the-money" option grants to Company employees, officers, and on at least one occasion to directors. Among the alleged backdating practices, Trident backdated offer letters to newly hired employees and "parked" low-priced options under the names of certain employees which were later allocated to different employees in subsequent months when Trident's stock price increased.
The complaint alleges that Jen was aware of some of the backdating practices during at least 1998 to 2006 and that he approved backdated grants to certain employees.
The SEC alleges that Lin and Jen signed and/or approved of the filing of annual and quarterly reports with the Commission that they knew, or were reckless in not knowing, failed to include compensation expenses associated with the "in-the-money" portions of the backdated grants. The reports falsely stated that Trident complied with stock option accounting rules and, in certain cases, stated that Trident granted options at the fair market value of the company's stock on the date of grant.
Lin and Jen also signed registration statements filed with the Commission that incorporated by reference these false and misleading periodic reports. The complaint also alleges that Lin and Jen reviewed and/or prepared proxy statements provided to shareholders that falsely reported stock option grant dates for executives and falsely stated that those stock options were granted at the market value of the company's stock on the date of grant. Lin and Jen also filed beneficial ownership forms (Forms 4) with the Commission misrepresenting the purported grant dates of backdated stock options that they each received.
The case is SEC v. Trident Microsystems, Inc., Frank C. Lin, and Peter Y. Jen, Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-01202 (JDB) (D.D.C.)] (LR-21593; AAE Rel. 3154).You Might Also Like:
E*TRADE Launches Planning Center for Equity Compensation Plan Participants
ERISA Stock Drop Challenge Targets Allergan
The firm is being challenged in a New Jersey district court for alleged imprudence in the management of its employee...
Lehman Stock Drop Suit Passed Over By Supreme Court
The high court will not offer another review to the long-running case, letting stand a lower court ruling that effectively...