Trio of Senators Introduces Retirement Reform Bill

The Improving Access to Retirement Savings Act parallels, but does not exactly match, the Securing a Strong Retirement Act, a piece of legislation which was recently advanced out of committee in the House of Representatives.

A bipartisan trio of senators has introduced a bill called the Improving Access to Retirement Savings Act, which, among other goals, would extend new retirement plan choices to nonprofit groups and expand/clarify incentives to encourage small businesses to offer plans to their employees.

The legislation parallels, but does not exactly match, the Securing a Strong Retirement Act, a piece of legislation which was recently introduced in the House of Representatives and which received a unanimous affirmative vote from the House Ways and Means Committee. Lawmakers in the House have taken to calling that bill “SECURE 2.0,” recognizing how it builds on the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Sponsors of the Improving Access to Retirement Savings Act include Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Senator Maggie Hassan, D-New Hampshire; and Senator James Lankford, R-Oklahoma. The trio says their bill provides common sense, bipartisan solutions that will help address the challenges and obstacles that continue to inhibit adequate savings and make it difficult for people to manage their incomes during retirement.

Passage of SECURE 2.0 in the full House and passage of the Improving Access to Retirement Savings Act in the Senate could lead to a reconciliation process that would eventually see a compromise piece of legislation become law. According to Paul Richman, chief government and political affairs officer at the Insured Retirement Institute (IRI), the chances for bipartisan retirement reform taking place this year now appear even greater. 

“Congress continues to signal strong, bipartisan interest in improving retirement savings opportunities and lifetime income choices for workers and retirees,” Richman says, citing two key provisions of the new bill.

First, he explains, the bill would encourage nonprofit organizations to offer employee retirement benefits by providing those groups with the same access to pooled employer plans (PEPs) that the SECURE Act offered to small businesses. Second, the bill clarifies when a small businesses can use a tax credit to help facilitate offering retirement plans to their employees if they join a multiple employer plan (MEP) or PEP.

“This clarification will encourage more small businesses to offer a retirement plan and facilitate greater use of MEPs or PEPs as the means to provide that plan,” Richman says. “With the Senate and the House introducing comprehensive retirement security legislation, IRI urges both chambers of Congress to work together and quickly act to bolster retirement security.”

Another feature of the Improving Access to Retirement Savings Act allows for a grace period to correct reasonable errors committed by parties administering automatic enrollment and automatic escalation features when groups are enrolling in a MEP, provided they are corrected within nine and a half months of the end of the year in which the mistakes were made.

Commenting on the filing of the legislation, Grassley says the bill will help more Americans save for their retirement while also giving small businesses and nonprofits another avenue to invest in their employees’ future financial security.

“Government should be doing everything it can to help Americans save more of their own hard-earned money,” Grassley says.

“No American should have to worry about affording retirement after a lifetime of hard work,” Hassan adds. “That’s why I have joined my colleagues on both sides of the aisle in introducing this commonsense bill that helps expand retirement options.”

Lankford says the policies covered in the legislation will make it easier for employers to offer retirement plans, improve overall accessibility and encourage retirement saving for employees.

“By making sensible updates to the law, this legislation makes it easier for small businesses and nonprofits to offer plans and expand access, which gives Oklahomans the freedom to save more of their money for retirement sooner,” Lankford says.

Govtrack.us has published the full text of the proposed legislation here.

Need for Holistic Well-Being Programs Has Increased

Budgeting, work-life balance and stress management were among high priorities cited by employees surveyed.

Employees are feeling increased physical, emotional, financial and career stress, research shows.

And U.S. employees’ perceptions of well-being across key areas—including physical, mental/emotional, financial, social and career well-being—have declined over the past year, according to Alight Solutions’ “2021 Employee Wellbeing Mindset Study.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Meanwhile, WorldatWork’s “Workplace Well-Being Trends” survey finds more than one-third of workers are perpetually burned out, which impacts engagement, innovation, productivity and well-being. The drivers of burn-out are largely related to job duties, manager interactions and personal health concerns.

WorldatWork’s survey suggests workforce well-being programs should support an employee’s physical, emotional or financial health, and nurture a positive and productive organizational culture. However, not all well-being programs are driving the intended impact on culture or worker health. Ninety-two percent of organizations make workplace well-being a priority and 96% have programs, but only 70% of employees agree their employer cares about well-being a great or good deal.

Eighty-five percent of employees who responded to the Alight study say “well-being programs offered by my employer make me feel better about my employer”—up 4 percentage points from last year. Financial well-being programs are most often cited as valuable, but programs across all dimensions of well-being get high marks.

The Alight study also found that employees continue to identify a diverse set of well-being priorities, supporting the case for employers to consider and provide a variety of initiatives. At least 75% of employees cite budgeting, eating healthy, work/personal balance, exercise and stress management as high or moderate priorities.

Well-being priorities differ by age and circumstance, though. For example, reducing debt is a higher priority among those with non-mortgage debt and taking care of children/others a higher priority among parents and caregivers. Alight suggests that, while having a diverse set of offerings is critical, employers should research the top priorities for their specific employee population as they consider where they want to make an investment.

Looking at physical, mental/emotional and financial dimensions of well-being programs, the Alight study found there is a stronger relationship between availability and access to communication resources (well-being champions, websites, newsletters and virtual experiences) and overall well-being than the relationship between the number of programs, type of programs or tools available, and perceived well-being. Alight says providing support and high-quality resources are important.

WorldatWork’s survey found that an employer’s decision to invest in well-being is most influenced by culture/well-being goals (66%), perspectives from executive leadership (61%) and a desire for enhanced workforce productivity/engagement (60%).

WorldatWork CEO Scott Cawood says the firm’s survey “highlights that a culture of well-being plays a far more critical role than any one benefit program to the long-term success of an organization.”

«