UK Pensions Follow US Trend

November 17, 2005 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - A new poll has found that, similar to US companies, UK employers are freezing their defined benefit pension plans to new employees.

Reuters reports that the National Association of Pension Funds found that more than half of 400 firms polled no longer allow new employees to join final-salary, or defined benefit, pension plans.   Some 57% of private-sector final-salary pensions are no longer open to new employees, according to the Association’s report.

Thirty seven responding employers closed their DB plans to new hires in 2005 and 36 plans were closed to new hires in 2004.   The survey drew responses from pension plans with a total of 9 million members and aggregate assets of over £370 billion, according to Reuters.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Just as in the US, many UK pension plans report large shortfalls between assets and their estimated obligations for benefits, Reuters says.   The reasons are the same as well: an aging population, low bond yields, and modest stock market returns.

After a series of pension fund failures, the UK government set up the Pension Protection Fund, an insurance agency similar to the US Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (See  Britain’s Answer to PBGC Opens for Business ).   In addition, the government set up the Pension Regulator to police the pension industry (See  UK Regulator to Seek Out At Risk Pensions ).

A special commission appointed by the government and chaired by Merrill Lynch Europe Vice Chairman Adair Turner is scheduled to present recommendations for pension reform to the UK government on November 30 (See  UK Commission Favors Auto Enrollment ).    One recommendation expected is the extension of the UK retirement age to 67 (See  Report: Raise UK Retirement Age to 67 ).

Health Care Costs More in Rural States

May 10, 2006 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - A new study supported by The Commonwealth Fund (CWF) found that employees in states with large urban populations, like California, Massachusetts, New York, and Pennsylvania, are getting better benefits and more value in their health plans than those in rural states.

According to a publication summary on CWF’s Web site, when study authors adjusted premium costs for the quality of benefits, Maine, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming – states with substantial percentages of rural residents – got the least value for their money. As an example, CWF said the study found the average adjusted premium for Wyoming employees with average benefits is $4,001, compared with $3,203 on average across all states, and $2,833 in California.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Type of health plan was found to be the key determinant of both actuarial value and adjusted cost. The overall actuarial value in health maintenance organization (HMO) plans was 90%, 84% in point of service (POS) plans, 81% in preferred provider organizations (PPOs), and 74% in indemnity plans, according to the study. Additionally, adjusted premiums are 25% higher for indemnity plans and 18% higher for PPO plans than HMOs.

It is because of the strong effect of plan type that adjusted premiums tend to be higher in rural states (where indemnity plans have large market presence) than in urban states with strong HMO market shares, the study authors concluded.

In addition, the study found that, on average, employees in America’s smallest firms (one to nine workers) pay 18% more in health insurance premiums for the same benefits than do those in the nation’s largest (1,000 or more workers) firms. Firms with 10 to 24 workers pay 10% more. The study attributes this to the higher administrative costs from marketing, medical underwriting, greater risk, and other factors associated with small size.

The study report, “Generosity And Adjusted Premiums In Job-Based Insurance: Hawaii Is Up, Wyoming Is Down,” is here .

«