Products January 19, 2022

Verity Launches Retirement Plan Governance Platform

The new platform for 403(b) and 457(b) retirement plans is targeted to address challenges in tax-exempt and governmental employer retirement plans. 

Reported by

Verity Asset Management, a registered investment adviser (RIA), has launched a new plan governance platform, Vynntana, for eligible retirement plan sponsors and plan participants. 

Vynntana was launched for 403(b) and 457(b) employer plan sponsors, eligible plan participants (i.e., employees of K-14 public schools, colleges, churches, governmental agencies and nonprofits) and investment providers.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The platform aims to offer plan sponsors a system providing best practices and plan management to enable investment committees to make informed decisions that can benefit participants’ retirement readiness, says Al Otto, national director, plan governance solutions for Vynntana.

“The service gives plan sponsors a set of tools to control the environment, and to do things appropriately from a best practice perspective,” he says. “It will put plan sponsors in control of their messaging and can lead to much improved outcomes for teachers and administrators in retirement.”

Tax-advantaged, employer-sponsored 403(b) and 457(b) retirement savings plans are offered to government and nonprofit employees. These plans are not subject to Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) standards that govern 401(k) plans.

MetLife previously launched a digital retirement enrollment platform for 403(b) and non-ERISA plans early last year.

Verity says it created its plan governance platform for plan sponsors’ comprehensive plan management and oversight, with a process that includes help from independent experts. The platform allows every party to engage and collaborate to better plan performance, with the service incorporating an open architecture platform providing a single point of entry to support multi-provider plans.

The governance platform uses an evaluation process to improve retirement plans for participants. The process begins with a five-step review based on behavioral governance research and strategies that inspect plan governance; plan design; operational compliance; investment management; and participant engagement.

Otto adds that plan sponsors and retirement plan advisers using Vyntana can likely benefit from a “plan management system enabling committees to make informed decisions that have a positive impact on participants.”

Compliance January 19, 2022

Supreme Court Declines Review of Delphi Pension Case

Former non-union employees of the auto parts maker sought to overturn the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s decision to terminate their pension plan.

Reported by

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear the case of former Delphi Corp. workers who sued when their pension was terminated by their company and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) during General Motors’ 2009 bankruptcy. The move upholds a ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and ends more than 12 years of litigation over the matter.

Approximately 20,000 non-union retirees of the former General Motors Corp. parts unit who were affected by the pension cuts had asked the justices to overturn PBGC’s decision to terminate the plan.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“To say we are disappointed would be a terrible understatement,” Chuck Cunningham, legal liaison to the Delphi Salaried Retirees Association, told the Detroit News. “We held out some high hopes for this. We’ll never know why they didn’t take it, but we’ll always feel pretty bad about it. It’s pretty tough news to take for so many of our members.”

Auto parts producer Delphi filed for bankruptcy in October 2005, and General Motors, the former owner of Delphi, filed for bankruptcy in 2009. That year, an association of retired Delphi salaried employees sued PBGC after it took over the workers’ pension, reduced their benefits, and terminated the plan. The plaintiffs claimed that some plan participants lost as much as 70% of their vested benefits with the PBGC takeover.

The lawsuit centered on whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) required PBGC to get a judicial decree before terminating the pension plan, which the Delphi retirees had argued the agency was required to do. However, PBGC argued that the law allows for an alternative for terminating a distressed pension plan with an agreement between PBGC and the plan’s administrator. 

The three-judge 6th Circuit agreed with PBGC in 2020, ruling that a provision in the law allows for the closing of distressed pension plans through such an agreement without court approval.

In November, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel led a coalition of seven state attorneys general in filing an amicus brief before the Supreme Court arguing that the due process rights of the former Delphi Corp. employees were violated when the corporation’s bankruptcy led to the pension plan’s termination. “For many of the affected employees, their careers were spent entrusting Delphi to deliver on its pension plan,” Nessel said. “Losing vested benefits—through no fault of their own nor with any say in the matter—violated the rights of these employees. Our filing seeks to rectify that grave error.”

The brief said that “the 6th Circuit’s broad holding has dire implications within that circuit, as well as anywhere else where the same is adopted.”

This article was originally published by PLANSPONSOR’s sister publication CIO.

«