Want Workers to Retire on Time? Match Job With Mental Capacity

While employers may not want employees to work past retirement age, they also may not want to lose workers forced to retire early. Research suggests companies must be aware of how employee health can be negatively affected by the demands placed on them.

These days, the retirement age of 65 isn’t as sticky. A recent survey from the LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute found one in five survey respondents continue to work past that age.

Fidelity Investments’ most recent Plan Sponsor Attitudes Study found that nine in 10 plan sponsors reported that they have had employees work past their desired retirement date. Seventy-three percent of sponsors acknowledged that there are costs when employees delay retirement, including increased benefit costs (37%), reduced mobility for younger employees (33%), challenges for strategic workforce planning (31%) and lower productivity (27%).

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

But, while retirement plan sponsors may not want additional costs from employees retiring later, they also may not want to lose valuable knowledge and the ability for older workers to mentor younger ones if employees retire too early. Being forced to retire early may also mean the employee hasn’t saved enough to sustain himself through retirement.

Research published by the American Psychological Association found older workers whose reasoning abilities no longer allow them to meet the demands of their jobs may be more likely to develop chronic health conditions and retire early.

The researchers used a subset of data from the Cognition and Aging in the USA survey, collected between 2007 and 2014 from 383 participants who remained in the study for the full seven years. The survey looked at a variety of factors, but the researchers used the data collected on participants’ abilities, health and retirement status over the course of the survey. At the start of the survey, participants were all at least 51 years old. The average age was 61.

The researchers measured cognitive ability using a combination of 13 different measures, including verbal analogies, number series and calculations. The researchers also measured demands from jobs using the O*NET database, which reports the knowledge, skills, abilities and other attributes needed for many jobs in the United States. Participants were also asked to report if they had any of nine health conditions, including high blood pressure, arthritis, diabetes and lung disease.

The study found that having reasoning abilities that matched the demands of the job was important to the positive experience of work in older age. When reasoning abilities required by a job exceeded a worker’s abilities, workers reported more health conditions and were more likely to be retired. When workers’ reasoning abilities met or exceeded a job’s demands, they reported fewer chronic health conditions.

“We found that a poor fit between reasoning abilities and job demands might cause older workers to experience stress and strain that serves to push them out of the workforce,” said Margaret Beier, PhD, of Rice University and lead author of the study.

Reasoning abilities decline with age, so organizations must be aware of how employee health can be negatively affected by the demands placed upon an employee, said Beier. Older workers can handle highly complex jobs as long as they have the mental resources to match the job demands.

The results of this study could inform decisions on how jobs for older employees should be designed to reduce the potential for negative health outcomes and retain these veteran employees as long as possible before retirement, according to Beier.

The article“Age and Job Fit: The Relationship Between Demands-Ability Fit and Retirement and Health” was written by Beier; Wendy Jackeline Torres, MA, Rice University; Gwenith G. Fisher, PhD, Colorado State University and Colorado School of Public Health; and Lauren E. Wallace, PhD, Colorado State University. It is available at www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/ocp-ocp0000164.pdf.

Plan Sponsors Making Plan Changes to Help Employees Save More

They are turning to plan advisers for help with making plan design and investment changes.

Sixty-two percent of retirement plan sponsors say their employees expect to meet all of their funding needs in retirement, but 45% of sponsors do not think their employees are saving enough to retire, according to Fidelity Investments’ Plan Sponsor Attitudes Study.

Ninety percent of sponsors have had employees work past their desired retirement date, and 73% of sponsors say there are costs associated with employees delaying retirement. Thirty-seven percent say this leads to increased benefit costs, 33% say it reduces career mobility for younger workers, 31% say it causes challenges for strategic workforce planning, and 27% say it leads to lower productivity.

“At the end of the day, it isn’t news that many employees are falling short on retirement savings,” Jordan Burgess, head of specialist field sales overseeing defined contribution investment only at Fidelity Institutional Asset Management, tells PLANSPONSOR. “One piece of progress is that plan sponsors and plan advisers are more aware of this and the implications it has for their company.”

Burgess says the fact that 90% of employers have faced employees or a subset of employees working past their desired retirement date “is an important number. They are much more aware of the impact this has on their company and associates.”

The data infers that sponsors are looking for guidance from retirement plan advisers to help with these challenges, Burgess says. That is why 93% of sponsors are working with an adviser, up from 68% 10 years ago, he says. Sixty-three percent are satisfied with their adviser, up from 19% in that same time frame, he adds.

“They are hiring advisers to understand how well their plan is functioning and how to improve it,” he says. Specifically, sponsors are focused on participation, their match, fund choices and lowering costs, he says. “Advisers are driving changes to help with these goals,” Burgess says. “In fact, in 2019, 75% of plan sponsors made some type of change to their plan. The first area is in plan design, all designed to help employees save more. They are either increasing the match or adding one, adding a Roth option and adding automatic increases. We look at these developments as very positive to helping people save more.”

The second area where sponsors are making changes is to the investment lineup, most notably increasing options. Fidelity thinks plan sponsors are likely adding passive options due to their lower costs, replacing underperforming funds and adding target-date fund (TDF) options, Burgess says. “The investment piece is all about costs and offering a quality lineup to help their workers get to the right asset allocation,” he says.

“We know that these are encouraging and important changes because we know that to be successful, you need to be auto enrolled early—longevity of saving matters—and the contribution and the match are also important,” Burgess says.

What sponsors are seeking from their advisers is help “with the increasing complexities of running a plan,” he says. “They want their 401(k) plan to be competitive so that they can recruit top talent. They want to reduce costs. They want to reduce the threat of litigation, and they want help with their fiduciary responsibilities.”

Additionally, they want their adviser to educate employees about retirement and the importance of saving enough, as well as to create a strong investment lineup and implement a financial wellness program that helps their employees with financial goals beyond retirement, he says. “Advisers are dealing with more than they ever have,” he says.

In fact, the study found that 56% of employers are offering a financial wellness program, and 59% said they found them to be very impactful for their workforce.

More information about the survey is here.

«

Thank you so much for your interest in our content. Please register to access this complimentary archived content. By registering, you will receive our newsletter which can be opted out of at any time.

 

 

Already Registered? Click here to confirm.