Whatever Happened to CITs in 403(b)s?

It’s still a work in progress, as a legislative proposal makes its way through Congress.

403(b) plans still may not use collective investment trusts, an investment similar to a mutual fund that is subject to fewer regulations and requirements and often carries lower fees for defined contribution retirement plans. This is despite other defined contribution plans, such as 401(k)s and 457s, being able to use CITs and, according to recent data, doing so in greater volume every year.

At the moment, the best chance in the near-term for 403(b)s to access CITs is a bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that could come up for vote in early March. The outcome will be closely watched by many retirement plan advisers and sponsors, some of whom pointed to the lack of access as a major miss in the passage of the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

One of the original three bills that later became SECURE 2.0 actually permitted 403(b)s to use CITs by amending the necessary tax and securities laws. This bill was known as the Securing a Strong Retirement Act and emerged from the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Ways and Means only had jurisdiction over the tax provisions, however, and when the House Committee on Financial Services, then controlled by Democrats, asserted jurisdiction over the securities provisions, the relevant amendments did not move forward. This resulted in a SECURE 2.0 that updated the required tax law to permit CITs in 403(b) plans, but not securities law.

A source knowledgeable of those negotiations, who declined to be named, noted that this was not an issue among Democrats on Ways and Means or in the Senate.

Since omitting the changes that would allow for 403(b) use of CITs is not considered a technical error, it cannot be fixed through a technical corrections bill, only through new legislation.

One such pending bill that would make the change is the Retirement Fairness for Charities and Educational Institutions Act, introduced by Representative Frank Lucas, R-Oklahoma. The bill was proposed in May 2023 and was voted through the House Financial Services Committee in December 2023. The bill would update the required securities laws to permit both CITs and insurance separate accounts in 403(b)s.

Representative Sylvia Garcia, D-California, offered one amendment to the bill at a mark-up hearing in May which highlighted the core objection to including CITs in 403(b) plans. Her amendment would have limited the use of CITs to 403(b)s that are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

403(b) plans sponsored by a private entity, such as a charity, are typically subject to ERISA, but those that are sponsored by state or local governments or by churches are not required to follow ERISA, though they may opt into it.

Garcia argued that only ERISA-governed 403(b)s “have enough federal safeguards in place to keep their money safe,” noting that CITs lack the same “SEC investor protection framework” as traditional mutual funds, and this could leave non-ERISA 403(b) plans vulnerable, since they would lack SEC and ERISA oversight.

Though this amendment was defeated, the case had some currency among other Democrats on the committee, as it was defeated by a party-line vote of 26 to 21.

Lucas noted in defense of his bill that other non-ERISA plans, such as 457s, are permitted to use CITs, and non-ERISA 403(b) plans are still required, usually by state law, to screen investments.

The next opportunity to pass the Retirement Fairness for Charities and Educational Institutions Act is expected to be in early March, when the two continuing resolutions currently funding the government expire. No companion bill has yet been taken up by the Senate.

EBSA’s Lisa Gomez Calls Auto-Portability Key to Retirement Security

The assistant secretary pointed to the start this week of the comment period on proposed auto-portability guidance.

Assistant Secretary of Labor Lisa Gomez, the head of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, highlighted the automatic portability of workplace retirement savings as being among the key areas on which the Department of Labor is seeking feedback in order to improve retirement security in the U.S.

EBSA guidance on the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022’s Section 120, known as the automatic portability transaction regulation, hit the Federal Register Monday, initiating a 60-day comment period that will end March 29. The proposal provides an exemption for auto-portability providers to transfer forgotten retirement savings into a new workplace-retirement plan, with the goal of limiting lost or difficult-to-locate funds for individuals.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Gomez pointed to the provision as one of several into which EBSA is digging this year, with the goal of protecting worker savings.

“When changing jobs, one of the biggest decisions that you have to make is whether to roll your savings over to a different [plan sponsor’s] plan or an IRA,” Gomez says. “It’s an important decision, depending on how much you have saved, and particularly important today, when the greatest part of a person’s savings is often in their retirement account.”

Gomez noted that the provision ties into the recently proposed retirement security rule, often called the fiduciary proposal, because it addresses a pivotal moment in workers’ financial lives when they are between jobs and may be rolling over funds. That proposal, which has received industry and policymaker backlash arguing that enough regulations already exist, seeks to bring one-time rollover advice under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s fiduciary standards.

“Whether and how [participants] roll over their money can be the biggest financial decision that someone can make,” Gomez says. Through the retirement security rule, she says, EBSA and the DOL “want to ensure that no matter who a person goes to and no matter how they are looking to invest their money,” that adviser will be acting in the saver’s best interest.

In its newly published guidance, EBSA notes the issuance of earlier guidance on auto-portability transactions, in 2018, in response to a request by the Retirement Clearinghouse for prohibited transaction exemptive relief for its automatic portability framework. RCH, which received that relief, went live in November 2023 with a program in which the country’s largest recordkeepers automatically transfer unclaimed retirement savings into an employee’s new account.

Focus on Disclosures

When it comes to EBSA’s focus areas, Gomez notes that the department is guided by its goals to ensure people have access to “robust health and retirement benefits” and that they understand and can put those benefits to use.

To that end, she emphasized a recent request for information from the department, along with the IRS and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, seeking input on reporting and disclosures for ERISA-governed retirement plans. Gomez says EBSA is seeking commentary from people in the industry who “do this every day,” as well as advocates and participants themselves.

Their commentary will add to the responses, already being reviewed, to a summer 2023 request for information on simplifying and consolidating reporting and plan disclosures. The end goal of all this activity, she says, is a system workers can understand.

“We are focused on making things more understandable and accessible for the participant,” she says. “We are thinking about things like, How do people digest information better? What [has the industry] done to improve disclosures? How do you reach members of certain communities in different ways?”

Gomez also pointed to recent guidance provided by EBSA and the IRS on plan sponsors offering emergency savings via retirement plans. She believes the use of these pension-linked emergency savings accounts, known as PLESAs, which allow penalty-free withdrawals, may help people feel better about contributing to a workplace retirement plan.

“One thing that I hear frequently is that people who have access to workplace retirement accounts may not be participating because people get worried about tying their money up,” she says. The emergency savings account can help people pay for unexpected items like “the transmission going on your car, or a housing bill, or anything that comes up that people will feel more comfortable that they can access funds to pay for.”

Although offering PLESAs is voluntary, Gomez says EBSA is hopeful plan sponsors will see their benefits, and the regulator has tried to address outstanding questions in the recent guidance.

Some plan sponsors have already noted that, while they are in favor of emergency savings programs, they prefer to keep them separate from retirement accounts.

Communication Is Key

Gomez says her time in private practice has helped shape her focus on participant communication. She notes that, when working at New York labor law firm Cohen, Weiss and Simon LLP, she became familiar with workers’ concerns and with issues in plan descriptions or communication.

“This whole relationship of offering these benefits is one in which the workers who are in these plans work hard and have money that could be going in their pockets, as far as wages going into these retirement plans,” Gomez says. “The employers and plan sponsors are also spending money going into these retirement plans. If they are offering a plan, but the people don’t understand them, there’s lost opportunity there.”

EBSA offers to assist people with their benefits via a toll-free number and website called Ask EBSA.

«