Will DB Plan Sponsors With Overfunded Plans Consider Reversions?

Opportunities may arise for plan sponsors to take advantage of excess pension assets, but taxes must be considered. 

Plan sponsor Eastman Kodak Co. last week announced it is outsourcing management of its defined benefit pension assets and said it was considering all possible opportunities for the company to take advantage of the excess funding, beyond what is estimated needed for benefits payments.

Kodak’s funded ratio stood at 145% as of June 30, 2023, up from roughly 93% a decade earlier. Kodak’s defined benefit plan is overfunded by approximately $1.2 billion, according to information that the company had provided last year to Chief Investment Officer, a sister publication to PLANSPONSOR. 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

While Kodak did not publicly confirm it plans a pension reversion, in which a plan sponsor takes ownership of excess pension assets, Bloomberg reported last week that a reversion transaction was under consideration.

U.S. corporate pension funds are at all-time high funding levels, driven by strong equity returns and elevated interest rates, according to several corporate pension trackers. With many of these pension trackers showing average funded status of the largest corporate DB plans as greater than 100%, discussions on how to manage that surplus are likely happening at many companies.

“U.S. corporate pension plans have maintained their overfunded status for 14 consecutive months since early 2023.” said Ned McGuire, managing director at Wilshire in the firm’s February U.S Corporate pension plan funding status update.

Tax Considerations for Reversions

Companies that undergo a reversion process could be subject to a 50% federal tax bill, which could climb as high as 80% to 90% of the pension surplus when adding local and state taxes, says Zorast Wadia, a principal in and consulting actuary at Milliman Inc.

Still, there are processes that would relieve a company of this tax burden during a reversion process, including using some of the surplus assets to increase benefits for plan participants and beneficiaries, Wadia says. Doing this could reduce the federal tax rate to 25%.

A company could also choose to share the entire surplus with its pension participants and beneficiaries, which would not subject the surplus to any tax.

Without these tax strategies, a reversion could simply be too costly. With a pension surplus of $1.2 billion, Kodak could forgo up to $960 million to taxes, assuming a tax rate of 80%.

Other Options?

Will more companies opt for pension reversions? Not likely, Wadia says, due to the significant tax hurdles.

Companies are more likely to reopen their DB plans, rather than undergo reversion, Wadia says.

“That’s not to say that sponsors adopting DB plans is going to happen en masse either, but I would think that it’s more likely for … the sponsor to restart the defined benefit plan, rather than focus on capturing the after-tax portion of whatever’s left of the regression.”

IBM announced in 2023 that it will end corporate contributions to the company’s defined contribution plan and instead reopen its cash balance defined benefit pension fund.

Australia’s Government Pledges to Require Retirement Contributions on Paid Parental Leave

Program would start in July 2025 and help address the gender savings gap in the country’s retirement system.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese this week announced the Commonwealth Paid Parental Leave initiative will include contributions to employees’ defined contribution retirement accounts, starting in 2025, if his party remains in power.

In a major win for the superannuation industry — Australia’s nationwide defined contribution retirement system — and for Australian women, superannuation contributions of 12% of parental leave payments will be made by the government alongside parental leave payments, effective July 1, 2025. The proposal would only be effective if the Labor Party is re-elected in the next federal election, expected to take place in May 2025.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The measure is expected to benefit 180,000 families annually. While available to all new parents, the payment of super on PPL will overwhelmingly benefit women, who currently account for about 95% of those accessing the leave benefit. The present payment rate is the national minimum wage of A$882.75 ($584.27) per week, which means superannuation contributions would be about A$106 ($70.14) per week.

While the impact of paying super on top of PPL may be small, it will go some way toward closing the gender account balance gap in superannuation accounts. Currently, Australian women retire with as much as 25% less in their retirement accounts than men. The median superannuation account balance for those aged 60 to 64 is A$211,996 for males and A$158,806 for females, according to November 2023 data from the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia.

The parental leave initiative is part of the Labor government’s national strategy for gender equality, Working for Women, and will be factored into the May federal budget. It is expected to cost about A$250 million per year, based on previous estimates by Australia’s Department of the Treasury when the superannuation guarantee rate was still 9.5%. The guarantee rate now is 11% and it is scheduled to rise to 12% on July 1, 2025.

Paying super on top of PPL has long been advocated for by the superannuation industry and unions and was a key recommendation from the Women’s Economic Equality Taskforce. When the government announced the proposed A$3 million superannuation tax last year, it was hoped the additional revenues derived would be directed to paying super on PPL. At the time, the government said it would do so when it could afford to.

The wealth management industry overwhelmingly welcomed the initiative. Mary Delahunty, chief executive of the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia, said of the move: “It’s about bloody time.”

“For too long, women have retired with significantly fewer savings on average than men as a result of taking time off work or working reduced hours to have and raise children,” she said.

The head of the largest super fund in the country, AustralianSuper, said the announcement marks a major milestone for the women of Australia.

“Our data shows that a woman who takes 10 years out of the workforce to care for children has 12% less income in retirement than a woman who does not have a career break. That’s 12% less to pay for housing, food, healthcare, and other necessities to live well in retirement,” AustralianSuper chief executive Paul Schroder said. “After today’s announcement we look forward to seeing that gap close for many Australian women.”

This enhancement follows the government’s announcement in October 2022 that it would incrementally increase the PPL to 26 weeks by 2026 from 18 weeks. As of July 2023, it offers a combined 20 weeks to new parents, allowing them to take leave concurrently and removing any assumptions around primary care.

“The data is clear—that when women take time out of the workforce to raise children it impacts their retirement incomes with women retiring, on average, with about 25% less super than men,” Australia’s minister for women and finance, Katy Gallagher, said. “Paying super on government parental leave is an important investment to help close the super gap and to make decisions about balancing care and work easier for women.”

Amanda Rishworth, Australia’s minister for families and social services, said: “Paying superannuation on PPL is another key step to prioritize gender equality, better value care work and improve women’s workforce participation. It helps normalize taking time off work for caring responsibilities and reinforces PPL is not a welfare payment—it is a workplace entitlement just like annual and sick leave.”

Another recommendation from the Women’s Economic Equality Taskforce would extend PPL by phasing the entitlement up to 52 weeks and boosting the payments to reach a replacement wage and ensure the scheme incentivizes men’s use of PPL.

This article initially appeared in PLANSPONSOR’s sister publication, Financial Standard.

«